<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for skinner</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-f622889f" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/skinner/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:46:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Rupert Murdoch Plans To Hide His Sites From Google, The World Yawns</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/11/09/rupert-murdoch-google/#comment-22449500</link><description>I thought he was dead already, which kind of says it all about how important print news is nowadays. Who cares what murdoch thinks about how the Net works? He'll find out, for sure.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:46:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disgusting Google scam loose on Twitter</title><link>http://blog.arhg.net/2009/09/disgusting-google-scam-loose-on-twitter.html#comment-16909353</link><description>I totally agree with you Andrew: personal and professional pride is the way to go!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:51:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing Blog Posts That Work Well For Search Engines &amp; Searchers in a CMS</title><link>http://www.rustybrick.com/writing-seo-blog-posts.html#comment-15463102</link><description>Hi Barry, good points. I'd just like to say that I don't think the H1 tag is as important as it's made out to be though: I've found that if you use H2 or even H3 you get the same results. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 07:43:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Twitter Rape Case&amp;#8221;: MC Hammer&amp;#8217;s Cousin Arrested</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/07/31/twitter-rape-case/#comment-13869871</link><description>I agree with you Nikki: what was that woman doing in a hotel room with a strange man? She sure likes to live dangerously--and this is the result. In fact, I doubt the whole thing. Sounds like someone planned it to me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 02:47:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hacking, Cyber Crime, TechCrunch &amp;#038; You&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/hacking-cyber-crime-techcrunch-you/#comment-13123857</link><description>Thankyou Kat, I'm honored. :) I think anyone else confronted with the temptation probably wouldn't go for it, considering how opinion, and as you say, karma would be pretty much stacked against them: doesn't seem as if it would be good for business to me. I don't really subscribe to the theory that there's no such thing as bad publicity. Bad PR really can work against you dramatically online.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:44:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hacking, Cyber Crime, TechCrunch &amp;#038; You&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/hacking-cyber-crime-techcrunch-you/#comment-13122600</link><description>According to a poll by &lt;a href="http://Alltop.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Alltop.com&lt;/a&gt; over 75 percent are against TechCrunch publishing stolen material, so I'd say the trend is overwhelmingly in favor of ethics. Quite comforting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:39:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hacking, Cyber Crime, TechCrunch &amp;#038; You&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/hacking-cyber-crime-techcrunch-you/#comment-13009441</link><description>Hi Randy, this is precisely my point: in fact, stolen information can cause a lot more heartache than stolen posessions don't you think?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:52:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hacking, Cyber Crime, TechCrunch &amp;#038; You&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/hacking-cyber-crime-techcrunch-you/#comment-13009351</link><description>Hi Noah, thank you :) It is not clear at the moment how it's all goign to end up, but so far TechCrunch seem defiant that they have the right to publish this stolen info. I wonder how they'd react if their own personal and business information was up for grabs?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:50:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hacking, Cyber Crime, TechCrunch &amp;#038; You&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/hacking-cyber-crime-techcrunch-you/#comment-12833256</link><description>I totally agree with you Dana, and I'm going to unfollow TechCrunch as soon as I'm done writing about this incident. It's also coming off my RSS reader. I also feel very strongly about this: we need to send THE strongest signal that it is not alright to steal people's data and publish: even if it is 'newsworthy.'</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:55:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hacking, Cyber Crime, TechCrunch &amp;#038; You&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/hacking-cyber-crime-techcrunch-you/#comment-12714147</link><description>Hi Ben, &lt;br&gt;Thanks for your expression of total agreement :) it's nice that you're first too. I expect some flack, but it's a pleasant surprise how many people actually seem to agree with me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:53:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: Will Spammers Murder Our Favorite Social Media Tool?</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/twitter-will-spammers-murder-our-favorite-social-media-tool/#comment-12304102</link><description>Personally, I'd like to see really stringent action taken against spammers--like having their websites and emails closed down and their IP blocked en masse. That's my dream. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:51:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter: Will Spammers Murder Our Favorite Social Media Tool?</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/twitter-will-spammers-murder-our-favorite-social-media-tool/#comment-12304080</link><description>Yes, I admit I've taken part in followfriday, and it was nice in the beginning, but now it is simply extremely irritating and i don't think it provides a useful purpose as most of those taking part are simply spammers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:50:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SEO Blackhat SMO Tricks Can Hurt You Even if You Didn&amp;#8217;t Do it Yourself!</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/2008/10/02/seo-blackhat-smo-tricks-can-hurt-you-even-if-you-didnt-do-it-yourself/#comment-11871662</link><description>Hi Roland, I'm really sorry to hear about your problems. A good SEO should be able to guarantee a minimum of results, and they should certainly be able to guarantee that you won't get penalized by Google as a result of their work. Took a look at your website, and yes, it could use a little help. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Basic SEO will always put you ahead of the guys that aren't doing it. Knowledgeable web marketing can make a staggering difference to your business online (this includes SEO). I don't care what anyone else tells you, this is a fact.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:11:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Calling all Social Media experts &amp;hellip;. oh wait there aren&amp;rsquo;t any</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/06/22/calling-all-social-media-experts-oh-wait-there-arent-any/#comment-11618343</link><description>I think you're being a little harsh here Steven. I agree there are some total idiots out there claiming to know how to promote via social media, and obviously HabitatUK didn't do their homework, and so ended up with one of those. But there are a great many online who do know what they're doing. It's like any field I suppose: buyer beware. You can even end up with a quack doctor if you don't do your homework first. I do agree that most experts don't brand themselves as such though. My point mainly is that there's too much aggressive commentary going on--it's spoiling the social media milieu I'd say.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:56:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Twitter is a Great CPA Marketing Tool!</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/why-twitter-is-a-great-cpa-marketing-tool/#comment-10942187</link><description>Hi, yes you always get early-adopters and others who take a bit longer to warm to new concepts in any new branch of online technology. We've been hearing for years now about how Twitter is a fabulous business tool, but as you say, not so many people know how to connect the dots. Time for an info package I think. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:13:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ultimate List of Web Tracking Applications</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/ultimate-list-of-web-tracking-applications/#comment-10554223</link><description>Hi Timmy, yes I agree about the links (and content) but still you need to know what your traffic is doing. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:19:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Matt Cutts is a really nice guy but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/matt-cutts-is-a-really-nice-guy-but/#comment-10529789</link><description>Hi, nice to see you here! I absolutely agree with you: but what I'm saying is we should be aware that he's not going to give us everything we want to know about issues that hinge directly on how Google treats our pages. :) I also agree he's a very knowledgeable guy and fascinating to listen to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and just to illustrate what I was talking about further, is this wonderful post I found on page rank sculpting: &lt;a href="http://www.traffick.com/2009/06/pagerank-sculpting-is-dead-good.asp" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.traffick.com/2009/06/pagerank-sculpt...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:55:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why WordPress Can Help Your Business&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/why-wordpress-can-help-your-business/#comment-7257068</link><description>Hi Nick, yes for sure no CMS can possibly replace your proactive marketing  and link building strategies--but it can put you well on the way to success. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:36:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Birth of the SEO Self Regulation Community</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/the-birth-of-the-seo-self-regulation-community/#comment-7160521</link><description>Ooh I'm not talking about 'outing' anyone. I have far better things to do with my time. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, I'm not suggesting my 'group' become decision makers for anyone but themselves. Why would anyone want to do that? Rather, I think we will actually be more effective because we are volunteering to self-regulate. We will be quite independent from other SEOs so if you disagree that we're doing the right thing I can't see what's to get upset about. Frankly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:17:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Birth of the SEO Self Regulation Community</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/the-birth-of-the-seo-self-regulation-community/#comment-7145270</link><description>Hi Jim, there's only one thing for it: I have to make a blog post about exactly what my vision is.. I'm not really suggesting that we police each other: the idea behind self regulation is that by joining a member of the SEO Self Regulation Community will agree to avoid bad practices and to embrace the best practices commonly accepted in SEO. More later.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:34:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Birth of the SEO Self Regulation Community</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/the-birth-of-the-seo-self-regulation-community/#comment-7145199</link><description>Thanks Dave. Yeah, I agree that the search engines won't make it easy.. But there are things that some so-called SEOs have been doing that get us all a bad name. I am not talking about professionals or the big names, but a green website owner who doesn't know the difference can't be expected to know if he's dealing with a fly-by-night or one of us, and that's what I aim to change. :) Welcome by the way.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:31:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Birth of the SEO Self Regulation Community</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/the-birth-of-the-seo-self-regulation-community/#comment-7139882</link><description>First Jill, don't take it personally because I really didn't have you in mind when I was talking about high profile SEOs. Funny but the people I did have in mind haven't take issue with what i said. I wasn't being insulting at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are you saying that all top SEOs reveal all their strategies for everyone to copy? They don't for sure and I'm positive that they don't want to be subject to regulations so that they never have to reveal exactly what it is that they do. We all feel like that to a certain extent I suppose. But I was not accusing them of wrongdoing. They wouldn't be where they are if they habitually took risks with their clients.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All you keep saying is that rules won't work. All I'm saying is that we don't necessarily  need a list of what we must do, but rather a list of what we should never do for client protection. That's all. It's no problem to our community (which is growing steadily), if most of you don't want to join. We're happy to be the heretics for now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:32:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Birth of the SEO Self Regulation Community</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/the-birth-of-the-seo-self-regulation-community/#comment-7113428</link><description>Hah, my grandfather was from County Cork. :) Nice to meet you Ann.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:26:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Birth of the SEO Self Regulation Community</title><link>http://www.wellwrittenwords.com/the-birth-of-the-seo-self-regulation-community/#comment-7113265</link><description>They most certainly don't recommend Black Hat--and I never said they did. I didn't even accuse them of practicing Black Hat. But you know what? If I earned $30,000 a week, or whatever the heck it is that Rand currently commands, I wouldn't want to be regulated either. But when you're at the other end of the scale and Matt Cutt's remarks are scaring clients away, then self regulation might be an answer don't ya think?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:20:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 12 Steps Of SEO Anonymous</title><link>http://www.learningseobasics.com/12-steps-of-seo-anonymous#comment-6976714</link><description>It has been quite a journey for us all Kimberly, but hopefully there's light at the end of the tunnel: website looking good :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skinner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 08:02:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>