<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of shinchi</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/shinchi/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:25:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Seesmic future team interview by Robert Scoble</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2009/11/seesmic-future-team-interview-by-robert-scoble.html#comment-22918821</link><description>thanks Freida!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:25:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30 predictions for the future of Twitter</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2009/11/30-predictions-for-the-future-of-twitter.html#comment-22637350</link><description>Yeah sure Facebook is not making a lot of money! Get fresh news my friend...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:14:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30 predictions for the future of Twitter</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2009/11/30-predictions-for-the-future-of-twitter.html#comment-21620792</link><description>I agree Rob, I have never pretended being revolutionary in any way in those&lt;br&gt;predictions</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:25:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30 predictions for the future of Twitter</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2009/11/30-predictions-for-the-future-of-twitter.html#comment-21607839</link><description>thank you JP, good points! see you at leweb</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:07:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30 predictions for the future of Twitter</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2009/11/30-predictions-for-the-future-of-twitter.html#comment-21605411</link><description>thanks Neville, glad to see we're on the same page</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:00:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30 predictions for the future of Twitter</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2009/11/30-predictions-for-the-future-of-twitter.html#comment-21564382</link><description>I really think Google Wave has absolutely nothing to do with Google Wave.q</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:37:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30 predictions for the future of Twitter</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2009/11/30-predictions-for-the-future-of-twitter.html#comment-21557761</link><description>yeah, and they say Twitter is for old people like you!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:20:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30 predictions for the future of Twitter</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2009/11/30-predictions-for-the-future-of-twitter.html#comment-21539932</link><description>j'aime beaucoup Digg, mais les personnes qui "diggent" sont des geeks, alors&lt;br&gt;que Twitter est deja en train d'atteindre le grand public&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2009/11/1 Disqus &amp;lt;&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:16:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30 predictions for the future of Twitter</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2009/11/30-predictions-for-the-future-of-twitter.html#comment-21539475</link><description>interesting, Christoph.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Banjo, it is not supposed to be read only, it was a presentation on stage&lt;br&gt;and I just added the text here to go with the video</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:02:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30 predictions for the future of Twitter</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2009/11/30-predictions-for-the-future-of-twitter.html#comment-21538157</link><description>my pleasure KY</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:44:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paying To Pitch</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/paying-to-pitch.html#comment-19873973</link><description>we received hundreds of applications, sorry for the startups who could  &lt;br&gt;not make the deadline, we have given plenty of advance notice.... we  &lt;br&gt;also need to organize everything</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:14:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paying To Pitch</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/paying-to-pitch.html#comment-19873560</link><description>thank you Nigel, appreciate some support here!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:56:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paying To Pitch</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/paying-to-pitch.html#comment-19852066</link><description>it is not a fund raising contest. It is a startup competition which we had&lt;br&gt;for years and which provides exposure to the startups to a very broad&lt;br&gt;public, not pitching angels or VCs. There is a very large press coverage for&lt;br&gt;example, many startups last year and the winners for sure got even featured&lt;br&gt;on our "french CNN" LCI TV channel. LeWeb is much broader than pitching vcs&lt;br&gt;and angels.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:48:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paying To Pitch</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/paying-to-pitch.html#comment-19851955</link><description>Jeff, I would love your help to find a sponsor that cover all the startup participation costs and would be happy to talk to anyone you have in mind, indeed it is a great solution, we have not found anyone for that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:44:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Mac OSX essential apps I could not live without</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2009/10/my-mac-osx-essential-apps-i-could-not-live-without.html#comment-19848761</link><description>About 2 hours</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:41:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paying To Pitch</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/paying-to-pitch.html#comment-19848618</link><description>Too bad you don't understand, I tried my best to explain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:36:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paying To Pitch</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/paying-to-pitch.html#comment-19847862</link><description>I don't think you're comparing events that can be compared in terms of costs...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:03:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paying To Pitch</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/paying-to-pitch.html#comment-19847833</link><description>we are not charging any speaker and on the contrary some of them who don't have the means we fly them from around the world and take care of hotels etc. Unfortunately we can't do it for all. But as I said, your comment gave me an idea, we will make it free if startups just want to pitch and are not interested in the two day conference.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am sorry but you are talking here about an event that takes a full year for @geraldine to put together and we finance it in person. For example we have put out of pocket 200 000 euros in advance to pay for the huge room in Paris, we are also entrepreneurs and we take a big risk with this. So while I agree in principle, I am tired of people that want everything for free. An event like LeWeb can simply not happen for free, I wish it could. We're doing a lot already, like very low tickets for students, which is a first this year. We're losing money on every single of them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:02:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paying To Pitch</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/paying-to-pitch.html#comment-19847740</link><description>having said that you just gave me one idea. We will offer the startups to pitch for free if the like, access LeWeb just for their presentation, or also buy a half price tickets for two full days.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:57:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paying To Pitch</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/10/paying-to-pitch.html#comment-19847116</link><description>this is inaccurate. LeWeb does not charge to "enter" the startup competition, we received hundreds of applications and they are all entered for free. The LeWeb ticket at normal price is 1,500 euros and we ask the companies selected to buy two passes at HALF price. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They get the entire event at half price as a participant and can demo their startups at no cost. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LeWeb costs more than a million euros to produce, barely breaks even and setting up a stage, a/v, wifi(! when it works ok) and a room for 2,000 people in Paris is a big deal, we believe we give a very fair deal. The startups benefit from the entire event and setup as a normal participant at half price, they get on stage for free.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really don't see what's wrong with that, there is value in just participating at the event which we let them go to at a discount. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some people won't understand that and will always want everything for free, that's fine, we could simply not put an event like this together with them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thousands of entrepreneurs come back every year and consider they get enough value for their money... Most US events cost twice as much to participate, do your research.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:24:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Just Made Love: Web Users Plot their Love-Making on a Map</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/10/i-just-made-love/#comment-19825361</link><description>@ crosberg thanks. you're right, and great response above as well. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tapps</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:16:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Just Made Love: Web Users Plot their Love-Making on a Map</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/10/i-just-made-love/#comment-19804529</link><description>better buy that now... unless someone else already did :P</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tapps</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:48:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Just Made Love: Web Users Plot their Love-Making on a Map</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/10/10/i-just-made-love/#comment-19804383</link><description>naw. it's not too serious. it helps foster this "accepted norm".. that if it's not challenged, it can give people who don't fit in that "projected norm" a feeling they don't belong, or worse. (just think if you're a depressed, suicidal gay teenager... anything, even a "for fun" website like this can be that last straw.) we really do need to take these things seriously. there's no reason why just a small change in the interface can't be made to include EVERYONE. (and in all honesty, it's a cool idea for a site. it just needs some tweaks.) :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tapps</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:46:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Mac OSX essential apps I could not live without</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2009/10/my-mac-osx-essential-apps-i-could-not-live-without.html#comment-19624554</link><description>Oh that"s a cool idea going to try it! Thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:41:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Mac OSX essential apps I could not live without</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2009/10/my-mac-osx-essential-apps-i-could-not-live-without.html#comment-19483346</link><description>yes it works perfect with google apps mail</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:00:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>