<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for seldo</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/seldo/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/seldo/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:17:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://theawfultruthblog.tumblr.com/post/34594700409</title><link>http://theawfultruthblog.tumblr.com/post/34594700409#comment-700931004</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We give all disasters names -- earthquakes, tsunamis -- but usually they're the name of the place they happened. But hurricanes move around, so we give them names independent of their location.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:17:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://iamyourcanadianboyfriend.com/post/506641952</title><link>http://iamyourcanadianboyfriend.com/post/506641952#comment-44058454</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your unsolicited futurama reference fills me with joy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:50:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://low.highindustrial.com/post/492111693</title><link>http://low.highindustrial.com/post/492111693#comment-43106377</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The ultimate bershon.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:46:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Can Haz Douchebag Move?</title><link>http://www.geeked.info/i-can-haz-douchebag-move/#comment-42402256</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really hate the way Tumblr breaks attribution, especially with image reposts. It would be such an easy thing for them to fix, too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:42:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://low.highindustrial.com/post/386328484</title><link>http://low.highindustrial.com/post/386328484#comment-34112166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh noes. He is about to ruin one of my favourite book series of all time! :-(&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:45:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: lowindustrial. (Uh, they make it looks easy?)</title><link>http://low.highindustrial.com/post/301760828#comment-27339111</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Every single one, man. Every single one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 13:07:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: lowindustrial. (All a-quiver.)</title><link>http://low.highindustrial.com/post/285318815#comment-25997169</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know it's a myth and everything, but the last remake of Robin Hood was less than a year ago. Can they not find something else to dredge up?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:41:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: i am your canadian boyfriend (I get my comics on Saturday.

 It was a good week.)</title><link>http://iamyourcanadianboyfriend.com/post/229803799#comment-21540960</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Saturn girl looks basically exactly like Number 6 from BSG. Just sayin'.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:49:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Start-up studies: A pop quiz</title><link>http://entrepreneur.venturebeat.com/2009/10/30/start-up-studies-a-pop-quiz/#comment-21362618</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The bicycle stand example has exactly the same problem as the ones suggested. You need something to measure the tire pressure, you need materials to make the booth and the signs. I bet you'd have trouble finding those for $5.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:04:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: i am your canadian boyfriend (I should probably cut back on my sugar intake.)</title><link>http://iamyourcanadianboyfriend.com/post/226402679#comment-21245564</link><description>&lt;p&gt;OH MY GOD YOU CAN FLY!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I knew it. You ARE Green Lantern.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:05:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Databases Should be Dynamically Typed</title><link>http://blog.mongodb.org/post/215738382#comment-20285266</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The advantage of statically typed RDBMS that you're leaving out are (a) storage optimization (b) query optimization.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You could get halfway to simulating a dynamically-typed RDBMS by declaring all your columns as, say, VARCHAR(5000). You could store strings, integers, floats, dates, etc. all in there pretty simply. However, they would use a lot more storage space as strings than they would as native data types (e.g. integer 1000 is one byte, string '1000' is 4). Over a large data set that would really add up. Secondly, when doing queries, your comparison operators (e.g. WHERE date &amp;gt; 2009-07-06) would be way less efficient as string comparisons than native type comparisons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These considerations are also, of course, limitations of various (but not all) NoSQL systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:18:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: lowindustrial.</title><link>http://low.highindustrial.com/post/169103905#comment-15244150</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To be fair, he was only ever really a model who dabbled briefly in acting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:53:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: skylor.me</title><link>http://skylor.me/post/168315105#comment-15216469</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The annoyingness of your "high resolution" overlays is particularly evident here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:30:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weird</title><link>http://atsween.tumblr.com/post/162093378#comment-14925798</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't be silly, everybody knows who Namor is. Hot dude, has a thing for Susan Storm.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:32:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: skylor.me - O rlly?</title><link>http://skylor.me/post/107228419#comment-9467436</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What about next year, when we'll hit 05:06:07 08/09/10?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 03:53:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: skylor.me - Even though I find deaf boys INCREDIBLY cute...</title><link>http://skylor.me/post/89411581#comment-7486209</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He's not deaf, he's a sign language interpreter :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:58:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: skylorlicio.us</title><link>http://skylorlicio.us/post/76019827#comment-6089483</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This looks suspiciously like the same guys who did the cha-cha slide video, and it's all much gayer than I would have thought soldiers would be comfortable with. Are these really actual soldiers?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 05:11:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://skylorlicio.us/post/70242745</title><link>http://skylorlicio.us/post/70242745#comment-5108674</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Me too! :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:39:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: From 30k feet - The implementation may be herculean but it isn&amp;#8217;t rocket surgery</title><link>http://www.davidrdesign.com/from-30k-feet-the-implementation-may-be-herculean-but-it-isnt-rocket-surgery#comment-3269665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Uh... your descriptions of the Publishing and Applications groups are identical. Is this an elaborate joke I'm not getting?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:16:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Blue Angels in San Francisco</title><link>http://www.geeked.info/the-blue-angels-in-san-francisco/#comment-2972832</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I dunno if I lose cool points, but I thought they were pretty awesome when I saw them last year. Also, I can't believe it's been a year since the last Fleet Week already. Geez.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:03:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Defense of the Animal Cracker</title><link>http://www.laaker.com/micah/blog/2008/in-defense-of-the-animal-cracker#comment-678689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You... may be taking this matter a little seriously. Also, your link to Stauffer's crackers goes to Keebler instead.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seldo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 04:20:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>