<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for sealfur</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/sealfur/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/sealfur/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 18:57:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 90 Minute, No-Soak Beans</title><link>http://www.thepauperedchef.com/article/90-minute-no-soak-beans#comment-1184850604</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is that 250º F or C?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 18:57:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 231: Danny Blay, 30 Rock Characters</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/2010/07/05/ep-231-danny-blay-30-rock-characters/#comment-60699201</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm the same way with Psyche. I hear someone else joining the cast and I think: "Oh wow. That's still a show?"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 20:56:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Need Your Help</title><link>http://littlerunningbear.com/161/i-need-your-help/#comment-60571761</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No problem, sir. I'll put you down for one signed Thumbs Up! Thanks so much. And yes. Let's do a catch-up in the next few weeks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 20:15:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Need Your Help</title><link>http://littlerunningbear.com/161/i-need-your-help/#comment-60571735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Niquey, that's absolutely lovely.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 20:15:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 228: How to Make it In America</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/?p=1609#comment-56768712</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ooh, John has a theory about this but I'll let him explain it. We talked about it after the show. It's really interesting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:14:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 228: How to Make it In America</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/?p=1609#comment-56768560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Isn't that pretty much what I said? Did I say it takes double the bandwidth? I think I did.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, thanks for clarifying. The point is, the government opened up bandwidth for the 3D broadcast but are you saying they didn't have to?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have to say, I'm generally not technically minded in this respect and I prefer to focus on the business cases, government requirements and, most of all, audience enjoyment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If they only broadcast a 3D image and the 2D receiver decodes it, won't that mean the image is shifted to the left or the right slightly?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:12:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 227: Provisionally the Greatest TV Characters of All Time</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/?p=1595#comment-55602579</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What do you mean by "the Boxcutters crew may have missed Press Gang because we're all too old"?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Firstly, I didn't miss it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Secondly, I DIDN'T MISS IT!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Don't include me in the Cropley-Thomas Home for the Aged.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now, if you'll excuse me I have a game of Giant's Treasure to get back to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:52:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 227: Provisionally the Greatest TV Characters of All Time</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/?p=1595#comment-55238319</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's time for partying and time for convalescing. I'd rather you were healthy but joining us in spirit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And yes, please submit your list.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 00:38:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My shortlist for Greatest TV Characters of All Time</title><link>http://sealfur.tumblr.com/post/648428578#comment-53199985</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. It's easy to go straight to the main characters, but they're so often the least interesting or exciting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 00:34:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MasterChef Cooks Its Results</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2009/07/17/masterchef-cooks-its-results/#comment-48451975</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And that makes us very happy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 00:40:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bloodshed, horror and sensationalism</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/2010/04/22/bloodshed-horror-and-sensationalism/#comment-46157583</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You reckon correctly. I didn't watch &lt;em&gt;Baby Faced Killer&lt;/em&gt;. I meant to put in a line about suspecting that it all might be part of the same series.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Channel 9 call it a "seven-part documentary-drama series" in their media release. Ordinarily a series like this would have eight parts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Did you watch the Carl Williams one? Was it any good or did it just stink of crime profiteering?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:38:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 220: Dave Lawson, Drew Rhodes, The Pacific</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/2010/04/19/ep-220-dave-lawson-drew-rhodes-the-pacific/#comment-45995745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, Alice. You really know a lot about war dramas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Personally, I learnt a lot more from your comments than from the three episodes of &lt;em&gt;The Pacific&lt;/em&gt;. Thanks for your input.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:29:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 220: Dave Lawson, Drew Rhodes, The Pacific</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/2010/04/19/ep-220-dave-lawson-drew-rhodes-the-pacific/#comment-45995193</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for that, Kat. I love that blog.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I really could have spoken to Drew for hours. I think location scouting is a fascinating part of behind the scenes preparation. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:26:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 217: Quentin Crisp telemovie, BBC changes</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/?p=1458#comment-43456856</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Currently there are no requirements for any of the multichannels to show any new local content as defined in the &lt;a href="http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_91809" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_91809"&gt; Australian content standard&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's a really good explanation in this &lt;a href="http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s2827113.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s2827113.htm"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Media Watch&lt;/em&gt; episode&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the &lt;em&gt;Media Watch&lt;/em&gt; page there are links to more resources as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:57:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 218: Dan Ilic, Dave Bloustien</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/2010/04/05/ep-218-dan-ilic-dave-bloustien/#comment-43444523</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A good point and well made. I really wanted to focus more on the differences between creating content for the web and TV and why those differences were there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think Dan's approach was really interesting. Get writers to create sketches on a theme. Create those sketches and see what does and doesn't get passed by the client.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are so many more ads in the campaign that don't involve redheads. A lot of them are really funny and knowing that the client rejected a whole lot of other ideas, I'd like to see what they were too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 22:37:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 6 Degrees of Sepa-&amp;#8217;Rage&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/2010/03/31/6-degrees-of-sepa-rage/#comment-42561466</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, I missed that little bit at the end.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Does that mean I wouldn't get one of those great big blue books if I won? That does dampen the experience somewhat.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:11:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 216: A Visit to Letterman, Kids in the Hall: Death Comes to Town</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/2010/03/21/ep-216-letterman-kids-in-the-hall-death-comes-to-town/#comment-41332563</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Outraged how? Which comments in particular?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't think any of us thought it was funny. The end message was why does Fiona O'Laughlin get hauled over the coals for a tasteless comment like that but Sam Newman can continue to be Sam Newman? And why weren't Fiona's comments edited out of the show?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bindy Irwin is in the public eye and people are going to say dumb things about her, criticise her, mock her and applaud her. That was the Irwin's choice, whether or not you agree with it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While I don't agree with Nelly's point that parents who put their children in show business are necessarily bad parents (was the inference I made), I don't think her comments deserve threats of violence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nelly's in show business and people are going to say dumb things about her. That was Nelly's choice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nelly's daughter is neither in the public eye nor in show business. She'll have plenty of dumb things said about her in the school-yard when that time comes. That's where most children get their unfair criticism. I don't think she deserves, or has been placed in a position to receive, critical threats of violence, metaphoric or otherwise, in a public forum.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:32:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 208: Men of a Certain Age, NBC and Leno and Conan</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/2010/01/18/ep-208-men-of-a-certain-age-nbc-and-leno-and-conan/#comment-30446928</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mords, you make a great point about the Vizard (or Clive) v Kennedy battle. I *had* forgotten about that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, I was so upset to forget Bill Carter's name. I think he's a brilliant TV commentator but was adamant to just power on through the segment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We have, in the past, reviewed his also excellent &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0767919742?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=boxcutters-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=390957&amp;amp;creativeASIN=0767919742" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0767919742?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=boxcutters-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=390957&amp;amp;creativeASIN=0767919742"&gt;Desperate Networks&lt;/a&gt;, which is definitely worth checking out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:17:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 199: The Cult, Ads for Shoes, Garry Shandling</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2009/10/12/ep-199-the-cult-ads-for-shoes-garry-shandling/#comment-21071401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Chuckles73. That is an interesting take on television advertising.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do you know if that's worked for them? I mean, has television advertising been as useful as their brochures?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:05:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 198: Beauty plus Geek, Marc Fennell</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2009/10/05/ep-198-beauty-plus-geek-marc-fennell/#comment-19273691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sorry you didn't like it, Bolden. We've had a lot of positive feedback about that interview. Although, I'll admit, none from anybody calling themselves "lame@getfucked.com".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We hoped to get across information about how aware contestants are about what they're going through with these shows. I haven't had a chance to listen back to the episode so I don't know if we succeeded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We hear a lot about manipulation of characters in Reality/Extreme Gameshows but on Boxcutters we've never spoken to anyone who has actually spent several weeks in a house with no outside stimulus.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If the contestants feel that they have grown and learnt something from the experience, then does it really lack moral value?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The concept of the show, especially in the US, is largely exploitative. What compels someone to put themselves up for that sort of exploitation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would hope that there is a difference between what the Corin and Jenna said on our show and what they would say on breakfast radio.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or maybe I've misunderstood you. Maybe you loved our interview with Corin and Jenna but hated the one with Marc Fennell from Hungry Beast.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:50:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 192: Southland, Quotes, Crap TV, Letters</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2009/08/10/ep-192-southland-quotes-crap-tv-letters/#comment-14572032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've missed the crunchy granola suite.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:38:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 191: James Talia, Torchwood, Hosts of things</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2009/08/02/ep-191-james-talia-torchwood-hosts-of-things/#comment-13858754</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am going to look at Warehouse 13 if only because I've heard all the science is accurate (and that's a rarity). Sometimes the Mai-Tai network produce good work but I have to say I was originally sceptical about another X-Files cc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:14:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pitch Yourself a Crumpler Beanbag</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2009/07/23/pitch-yourself-a-crumpler-beanbag/#comment-13697481</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The prize is a delightfully comfortable Crumpler Bean Bag. Other than that there is nothing that ties the two concepts together. It's a prize, but what a wondeful prize.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:23:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 189: Psychoville, Leafbusters, MasterChef Postmortem</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2009/07/20/ep-189-psychoville-leafbusters-masterchef-postmortem/#comment-13238152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's interesting that you think M*A*S*H should be on a never-ending loop. I was recently discussing it with a friend of mine and it's a really interesting case for a TV sitcom.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think it's worth discussing, for sure. Stay tuned.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:06:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ep 188: Human Giant, Pink and Penguins</title><link>http://boxcutters.net/blog/2009/06/30/ep-188-human-giant-pink-and-penguins/#comment-12236685</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But there is no...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:43:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>