<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for schwa</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/schwa/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/schwa/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:49:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is There Hope For Amtrak?</title><link>http://www.fastcoexist.com/1681479/is-there-hope-for-amtrak#comment-816610222</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So basically scrap all routes except for NY,DC and Amtrak will be profitable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:49:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: toxicsoftware.com</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.com/new_start.html#comment-725270277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I bet comments don't work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 00:55:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://tomloverro.com/post/20843166119</title><link>http://tomloverro.com/post/20843166119#comment-493418010</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hey Tom,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I work for Synthetic but in replying here I'm merely speaking for myself. My views do not represent the views of my employers, etc, etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So I think the way you're staging the story is as us vs them. It's not - Instagram's outstanding success isn't at Hipstamatics's loss. It's not a zero sum game, there's room for more than one camera app on an iPhone. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hipstamatic and Instagram do different things for different sets of users. Some users are in both sets and end up choosing one app over the other, that's fine. But either way, there are plenty of existing and future Hipstamatic users out there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:11:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shape Of: Buzz Andersen: A Plea for Better iOS Text Facilities</title><link>http://shapeof.com/archives/2012/02/buzz_andersen:_a_plea_for_better_ios_text_facilities.html#comment-428999784</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Buzz &amp;amp; Gus are talking about APIs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is no simple API for rich text editing (or display) provided to 3rd party developers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are complex APIs though…&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:02:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shape Of: Buzz Andersen: A Plea for Better iOS Text Facilities</title><link>http://shapeof.com/archives/2012/02/buzz_andersen:_a_plea_for_better_ios_text_facilities.html#comment-426732273</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Holy shit, a dev blog I can comment on???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think Buzz is just talking about presenting rich text - let alone editing. In which case my &lt;a href="https://github.com/schwa/CoreTextToy" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://github.com/schwa/CoreTextToy"&gt;https://github.com/schwa/Co...&lt;/a&gt; project is one -good- (imho) option.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've got a work in progress Rich Text Editor (based on my CoreTextToy) that I'm working on. Also there are a few open source and commercial rich text editors out there - google for UITextInput and you should get some hits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think Apple has decided to give us all the pieces we need rather than give us a single "one size fits all" view.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:18:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UIStoryboard Issues</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.com/uistoryboard-issues.html#comment-386632890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Madness! Madness I say.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's nothing intrinsically wrong with UIStoryboard. I think _if_ Apple improves upon it , it could be really useful. I just don't think the current version of it is ready.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:06:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UIStoryboard Issues</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.com/uistoryboard-issues.html#comment-386168801</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In a NIB based app I tend to pass the data needed by a VC as the VC is created (see my "initWithFoo:" example in the post.) This sprinkles the set up code amongst the VCs that need the data.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a storyboard based app the code for instantiation tends to get centralised in the source view controller.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On top of that because the destination view controller often is _not_ the view controller that needs the data (often there is a UINavigationController in the way) you need to get from the source view controller to the actual view controller that needs the data.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Look at the code example I posted in the body. And that just shows a prepareForSegue: for a single (destination) view controller - imagine if the source view controller had more segues. 3 segues in a source view controller isn't uncommon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And yes, thank you for pointing out how to file a bug with Apple. I was expecting Tim Cook to read my blog and make sure these features were implemented.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:29:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UIStoryboard Issues</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.com/uistoryboard-issues.html#comment-386021106</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's that. I haven't encountered it myself (for most of this project I was the sole developer). Was hoping it would merge cleanly though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:37:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UIStoryboard Issues</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.com/uistoryboard-issues.html#comment-385961191</link><description>&lt;p&gt;(Thanks for copying the comment from the gist - you raise a good point so am very glad you did)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The trouble with breaking up your UI into multiple storyboards is that it buys you very little over multiple NIBs. And you still have all those problems discussed above. You can't easily link between individual VCs spanning multiple storyboards so you're back to writing a lot of code (again).I do plan on using Storyboards still - like you mention it's the only way for the new UITableView features (I have to assume that's a bug on Apple's part). And I may keep storyboards for some simpler parts of the app (e.g. new user signup/login). But I definitely won't try to make the entire app use storyboards again.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll happily re-visit the technology again once improvements have been made. I have faith it can be made a lot better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:53:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: [steve release];</title><link>http://blog.urbanape.com/post/11356596670#comment-332786525</link><description>&lt;p&gt;[steve release]; ???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ARC man. ARC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lame joke aside. Nice post. Cool lego trick too. Got me checking that case out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:10:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shape Of: SPJ</title><link>http://shapeof.com/archives/2011/10/spj.html#comment-327835200</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love "and that was that".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I remember that moment too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Be well Gus.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 02:43:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://quatermain.tumblr.com/post/7492106658</title><link>http://blog.alanquatermain.me/post/7492106658#comment-247691703</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank god! No more Apple is teh Evil screeds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Congrats.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:12:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Calling a Turd a Turd</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.com/calling-a-turd-a-turd.html#comment-219039195</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Who was trashing the people? The people behind it were unknown.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes it's unfair to immediately blame the devs when something sucks. But at the end of the day they wrote the app.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:38:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 90% of Everything is Crap</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.com/ninetypercent.html#comment-218193225</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Having worked on literally dozens of products as a contractor I can definitely agree with you. Often you're considered "just the contractor" and never get any control over the quality of the final product. As a sub-contractor (a position I've preferred to avoid) it is even worse.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But totally blaming the client on the other hand isn't fair either. Contractors often blame the "crazy client" for everything - that's a cop out that is pretty common amongst contractors. I've certainly used "my hands were tied" line as an excuse for bad work. Maybe I could have made that product better on my own.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think the key to what I tried (and probably failed) to get over in this blog post is that lack of criticism is worse than too much. With out criticism everything is "awesome" and all developers are "rock stars". No product is mediocre. Everything is amazing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's all a lie. 50% of everything is below average and 90% of everything is shit. We all know that. Pretending otherwise encourages mediocrity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd rather my peers were overly critical of me and heck snarky with it than let me wallow in crapness.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:27:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://quatermain.tumblr.com/post/3365005188</title><link>http://blog.alanquatermain.me/post/3365005188#comment-151556281</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thought exercise for you:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Purely from a user's perspective what are the pros/cons of Apple's in-app purchase compared to any other alternative in-app purchase scheme?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm pretty sure you'll find that Apple's in-app purchasing is obviously superior in pretty much every way to other options.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What you're really asking for is "we want the right to have a sucky in-app purchase experience and potentially make more money per purchase". Apple seems to be saying "no".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:52:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://quatermain.tumblr.com/post/3048506087</title><link>http://blog.alanquatermain.me/post/3048506087#comment-138318647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's obviously rock solid reporting going on there. Let's just wait and see how it pans out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:31:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://quatermain.tumblr.com/post/3048506087</title><link>http://blog.alanquatermain.me/post/3048506087#comment-138311340</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wake me up when there's an official policy change and/or clarification of enforcement of existing policies.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:16:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Non-Busy iPhone Wallpapers</title><link>http://blog.urbanape.com/post/684440225#comment-58164904</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Could you post a screenshot showing what these look like with icons?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 01:05:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The iPad, Gestures, and Community</title><link>http://www.tobyjoe.com/2010/02/the-ipad-gestures-and-community/#comment-35054575</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good luck!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have you looked at the gesture recogniser classes in iPhone OS 3.2? They go a long way. Defining a common suite of gesture recogniser classes would be very useful I think. (And eq. classes on Android etc)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:23:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Run Python Script</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.com/run-python-script.html#comment-20195809</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have tried to update this for Snow Leopard and had mixed results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://bitbucket.org/schwa/toxic-public/changeset/5b2e44889bc3/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bitbucket.org/schwa/toxic-public/changeset/5b2e44889bc3/"&gt;http://bitbucket.org/schwa/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:07:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CocoaJSON</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.com/cocoajson.html#comment-20121229</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This code has been made redundant by:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://code.google.com/p/touchcode/wiki/TouchJSON" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://code.google.com/p/touchcode/wiki/TouchJSON"&gt;http://code.google.com/p/to...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:53:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disqus: The Official Blog - Disqus Comments: Import Your Blogger Comments</title><link>http://blog.disqus.com/post/199344954/import-your-blogger-comments?fooo#comment-18121687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Really want threads to be automagically-closed after a defined period of time. I have no interest in comments on old thread. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:20:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SVN Update Automator Action</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.com/svn_update_automator_action.html#comment-16018140</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've stopped using SVN so I probably wont ever be upgrading this to Snow Leopard. Sorry!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 06:53:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cocoatoa :: Snow Leopard, a bargain at twice the price!</title><link>http://www.cocoatoa.com/posts/2009/08/28/snow_leopard_a_bargain_at_twice_the_price/#comment-15534901</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you have run clang static analyzer on your code, you have bugs...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For some reason Xcode's Build &amp;amp; Analyze option doesn't find issues that the command line static analysis tool DOES find. Rather annoying.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:28:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: inessential.com: Get back to work...</title><link>http://inessential.com/2009/07/17/get_back_to_work_#comment-12857940</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ha.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One problem I find with Disqus (I use it at toxicsoftware) is that you can't automatically lock threads after N months. So I get a lot of dubious comments on my site on really really old threads. (And as I haven't blogged in, oooh, six months, most of my threads are old)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">schwa</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:20:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>