<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for salcan</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/salcan/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:45:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Sprint's Touch Diamond – First Thoughts - mediabistro.com: MobileDevicesToday</title><link>http://mobiledevicestoday.disqus.com/sprints_touch_diamond_first_thoughts_mediabistrocom_mobiledevicestoday_26/#comment-2306119</link><description>Pic here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://wmpoweruser.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/htc-touch-diamond.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://wmpoweruser.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looks pretty cool. Not even to get me on winmo though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">salcan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:45:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 594 Broadway: beautiful, but expensive </title><link>http://nwcny.disqus.com/594_broadway_beautiful_but_expensive/#comment-2247133</link><description>best location yet. what was the price per sq ft?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sal Cangeloso</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:21:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HP 2133 Mini-Note Linux version might not be such a great deal</title><link>http://liliputing.disqus.com/hp_2133_mini_note_linux_version_might_not_be_such_a_great_deal/#comment-352006</link><description>I'll be interested to see how it turns out. If I was going to pick on up, I would probably be leaning towards the SuSE model also. Not for the $50 savings, but in hopes of better performance and stability. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As good as the HP looks, I would personally not put any money down until I get to see some more devices. My Eee PC 4G is holding up fine and so much is on the way that it seems early to make a choice for an upgrade.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">salcan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:58:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A dangerous RSS trend</title><link>http://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/a_dangerous_rss_trend/#comment-86801</link><description>I haven't seen any sites with ads that are that bad. Even the big ones I read, like Boing Boing and Valleywag, have ads and sometimes double ads, but they are not bothersome enough that it makes me want to consider unsubscribing. Not only are these very low impact ads, but RSS is so much easier and faster than just reading the site they if they are giving me a full feed I can't really complain.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some sites offer partial feeds with no advertising and full feeds with advertising. I think this is a pretty good solution for people who just hate RSS advertising.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sal Cangeloso</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:01:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>