<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for rseidman</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/rseidman/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/rseidman/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 11:15:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Vacation Policy</title><link>http://avc.com/2016/05/vacation-policy/#comment-2696647327</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No abuse of policy + no requirement to pay accrued vacation at termination. That's a fantastic setup for the employers, but a lousy one for the employees.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 11:15:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Followup Friday: The Results of the Apple Watch Followup Survey</title><link>http://avc.com/2015/05/followup-friday-the-results-of-the-apple-watch-followup-survey/#comment-2043353752</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fred isn't usually a troll...except when it comes to Apple.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fred loves the populist stance that it was WRONG! WRONG! that he couldn't use Apple on whatever phone he wanted in 2007. And soon, on a blog post on this very domain it will be wrong! WRONG! that he can't use an Apple Watch with whatever phone he wants.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All of that is to say that I have the under when it comes to over/under 2016 before Fred owns, and blogs about owning, an Apple Watch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2015 16:36:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: List of how many homes each cable network is in as of February 2015</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2015/02/22/list-of-how-many-homes-each-cable-network-is-in-as-of-february-2015/366230/#comment-1870796665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm pretty sure you already know this, but for anyone else...channels that don't subscribe to regular Nielsen reporting (e.g. CBS Sports Network, Red Zone, etc) aren't included above&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:24:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: List of how many homes each cable network is in as of February 2015</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2015/02/22/list-of-how-many-homes-each-cable-network-is-in-as-of-february-2015/366230/#comment-1870793895</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:22:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: List of how many homes each cable network is in as of February 2015</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2015/02/22/list-of-how-many-homes-each-cable-network-is-in-as-of-february-2015/366230/#comment-1870586648</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No good deed goes unpunished! I've added the following note to the post:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;*Note:  despite being the February estimates, they were produced before Fox News ended its dispute w/Dish Networks in January and it's safer to assume Fox News is in 94.7 million homes and that Fox Business Network is in 79.9 million homes (those were the numbers in the January estimates).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 07:49:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: List of how many homes each cable network is in as of February 2015</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2015/02/22/list-of-how-many-homes-each-cable-network-is-in-as-of-february-2015/366230/#comment-1870325612</link><description>&lt;p&gt;no problem. this might be useful/interesting for you: &lt;a href="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/09/02/what-is-a-tv-rating-and-who-is-it-dating-2014-15-edition/298788/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/09/02/what-is-a-tv-rating-and-who-is-it-dating-2014-15-edition/298788/"&gt;http://tvbythenumbers.zap2i...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 01:55:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: List of how many homes each cable network is in as of February 2015</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2015/02/22/list-of-how-many-homes-each-cable-network-is-in-as-of-february-2015/366230/#comment-1870315507</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No. 83.6% of the 116.4 million homes with televisions in the U.S. have The Weather Channel (according to Nielsen).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 01:40:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: List of how many homes each cable network is in as of February 2015</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2015/02/22/list-of-how-many-homes-each-cable-network-is-in-as-of-february-2015/366230/#comment-1870314194</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is the percentage of households out of the 116.4 million households with TVs. I'll add some text to clarify that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 01:38:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: List of how many homes each cable network is in as of February 2015</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2015/02/22/list-of-how-many-homes-each-cable-network-is-in-as-of-february-2015/366230/#comment-1870304723</link><description>&lt;p&gt;no problem. easier to find specific networks the way it was posted, but I added an extra table after the 1st one that's sorted from most received to least received.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 01:24:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How many people are in the Nielsen TV ratings panel?</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/10/05/how-many-people-are-in-the-nielsen-tv-ratings-panel/310975/#comment-1621042715</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks to all, even the crazy guy who remembered some nonsense I wrote 3.5 years ago. Affirmation, baby!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To Bill: if all you'd done was invent the Renew/Cancel Index that would've been plenty. You did so much more. Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;to the folks decrying the size of the sample, that's very easy to do especially if:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;a.) you've never spent a second learning about confidence interval, margin of error, etc&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;b.) it isn't YOUR money that would fund the doubling, tripling or more of the panel for relatively insignificant gains in statistical accuracy. Spoiler: the people who'd actually have to spend the money (Nielsen's customers) don't think it's worth it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;c.) the numbers really don't matter if they don't confirm your biases. Even though there would be low-rated/canceled shows under *any* system, if a show YOU like is low-rated and/or canceled, whatever the system, it's obviously and horribly flawed!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 17:49:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is a TV Rating and who is it dating? 2014-15 Edition</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/09/02/what-is-a-tv-rating-and-who-is-it-dating-2014-15-edition/298788/#comment-1571376751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't, sorry.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:51:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is a TV Rating and who is it dating? 2014-15 Edition</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/09/02/what-is-a-tv-rating-and-who-is-it-dating-2014-15-edition/298788/#comment-1570841473</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you didn't miss it. there is a bit of division in editorial duties now between Zap2it and TVBTN and they favor galleries over lists.  If you favor lists I highly recommend Metacritic's: &lt;a href="http://metacritic.com/feature/tv-premiere-dates" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="metacritic.com/feature/tv-premiere-dates"&gt;metacritic.com/feature/tv-p...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:45:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is a TV Rating and who is it dating? 2014-15 Edition</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/09/02/what-is-a-tv-rating-and-who-is-it-dating-2014-15-edition/298788/#comment-1570832825</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it varies a little bit day-to-day for a variety of factors, but the national sample has consistently been in the neighborhood of 20,000 homes for at least several years. Last night there were 19,803 households &amp;amp; 49,510 people in the tabulation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:40:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is a TV Rating and who is it dating? 2014-15 Edition</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/09/02/what-is-a-tv-rating-and-who-is-it-dating-2014-15-edition/298788/#comment-1570827395</link><description>&lt;p&gt;2014-16 will be a very long season.  Both now fixed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:37:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Aereo Ruling</title><link>http://avc.com/2014/06/the-aereo-ruling/#comment-1453877924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fred, there are several OTA DVR solutions available already (see &lt;a href="http://www.tablotv.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.tablotv.com/"&gt;http://www.tablotv.com/&lt;/a&gt; ) and I think it's reasonable to expect that in short order you'll see things like that combined with (some/most/all of) the Internet streaming functionality stuff like Roku provides.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I too believe that *some* customers want to be able to DVR and stream content that is available free OTA, but my guess is most people probably don't (or don't want to) think about it at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:06:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Cable Ratings: 'Game of Thrones' Wins Night + 'Silicon Valley', 'Real Housewives of Atlanta', 'River Monsters', 'Married to Medicine' &amp;#038; More</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/05/20/sunday-cable-ratings-game-of-thrones-wins-night-silicon-valley-real-housewives-of-atlanta-river-monsters-married-to-medicine-more/265704/#comment-1395910788</link><description>&lt;p&gt;haven't seen the demos yet, but Penny Dreadful 10:01p = 722K viewers. Salem 10p = 500K viewers. Turn 9p =1.086M viewers. Da Vinci's Demons Saturday at 9p = 439K viewers&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 12:35:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: List of Renewed and Cancelled Broadcast Shows for the 2013-14 Broadcast Season</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/05/09/list-of-renewed-and-cancelled-broadcast-shows-for-the-2013-14-broadcast-season/261970/#comment-1378550405</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I did get secondary confirmation. Since I didn't do Bubble Watch this year and wasn't following things closely, it wasn't anything I monitored until I compiled this list, so "finally" realized is relative!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since everyone and their mother (Happy Mothers Day, moms!) knew Family Guy would be on in 2014-15 regardless, it doesn't seem like that big of a deal. If it is for you, so be it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2014 17:09:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tuesday Cable Ratings: NBA Playoffs Lead Night + 'Deadliest Catch', 'The Game', 'Tosh.0' &amp;#038; More</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/04/23/tuesday-cable-ratings-nba-playoffs-lead-night-deadliest-catch-the-game-tosh-0-more/256742/#comment-1352803912</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sat 9p Da Vinci's Demons: 426,000 viewers, 0.1 A18-49 rtg.   Those Who Kill Sun 10p: 593,000/0.1; Nurse Jackie: 625,000/0.2; Californication: 390,000/0.2&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:44:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Cable Ratings: 'Game of Thrones' Wins Night, + NBA Playoffs, 'Real Housewives of Atlanta', 'Naked and Afraid' &amp;#038; More</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/04/22/sunday-cable-ratings-game-of-thrones-wins-night-nba-playoffs-real-housewives-of-atlanta-naked-and-afraid-more/256183/#comment-1350949484</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yep. In case nobody posted yet, Veep 10:31-10:57p = 775K viewers and a 0.4 A18-49 rtg&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:24:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Salem' Premiere Draws 2.3 Million Total Viewers</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/04/21/salem-premiere-draws-2-3-million-total-viewers/256109/#comment-1349160305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yep, we use the national ratings in all our regular daily/weekly ratings posts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:06:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 'Salem' Premiere Draws 2.3 Million Total Viewers</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/04/21/salem-premiere-draws-2-3-million-total-viewers/256109/#comment-1349152094</link><description>&lt;p&gt;indeed, but those  are "national" ratings, the .83 was specified as a "coverage rating" which instead of measuring against the national population, only measures against the population that receives the channel.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:01:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tuesday Cable Ratings: 'Teen Mom 2' Leads Night + 'The Game', Women's NCAA Basketball &amp;#038; More</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/04/09/tuesday-cable-ratings-teen-mom-2-leads-night-the-game-womens-ncaa-basketball-more/252474/#comment-1328061746</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yep, often TFC doesn't have the individual show ratings, but sees the 8-11p primetime average for the network. Rather than simply not including ratings for shows they don't see, they use the primetime average and attach an asterisk to disclaim, but of course people don't scroll down to read the disclaimer...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 22:07:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tuesday Cable Ratings: 'Teen Mom 2' Leads Night + 'The Game', Women's NCAA Basketball &amp;#038; More</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/04/09/tuesday-cable-ratings-teen-mom-2-leads-night-the-game-womens-ncaa-basketball-more/252474/#comment-1327341332</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Degrassi 9p on TeenNick, 459,000 viewers and a 0.1 A18-49 rtg. Sorry, don't have anything in front of me but yesterday's #s.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 17:31:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Monday Cable Ratings: 'Monday Night RAW' Tops Night + 'Basketball Wives', 'WWE Hall of Fame', 'Bates Motel' &amp;#038; More</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/04/08/monday-cable-ratings-monday-night-raw-tops-night-basketball-wives-wwe-hall-of-fame-bates-motel-more/251983/#comment-1324788013</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bitten 8p ET: 813K viewers, 0.3 A18-49 rating&lt;br&gt;Lost Girl 10p: 815K viewers, 0.3 A18-49 rating&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 17:21:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bubble Watch: 'Friends with Better Lives,' 'Parenthood On The Bubble; 'Community,' 'Hannibal' Likely Renewed + Pilots At CW &amp;#038; NBC</title><link>http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/04/06/bubble-watch-friends-with-better-lives-parenthood-on-the-bubble-community-hannibal-likely-renewed-pilots-at-cw-nbc/251522/#comment-1321271597</link><description>&lt;p&gt;indeed. Since Tom's not around right now I modified the text around his comments on Unforgettable to note the renewal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Seidman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 12:07:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>