<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for rpetty</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/rpetty/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:12:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Services Need to Stop With the Twitter Kool-Aid</title><link>http://staynalive.disqus.com/services_need_to_stop_with_the_twitter_kool_aid/#comment-21775634</link><description>Robert, that was my point, Twitter is great to get the word out, but I'm a paying customer and like Jesse was unaware of the issue until Jesse raised it in the blog post.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, mind you my blog isn't "mission critical" by any stretch of the imagination, but a personal touch would be nice.  Of course, I don't think I'm paying for that level of service, so I'll have to check the SLA again.  I will monitor Twitter more closely and should probably have Rackspace tweets hit my mobile.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, I couldn't be happier with Rackspace overall.  Great products and great service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:12:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Services Need to Stop With the Twitter Kool-Aid</title><link>http://staynalive.disqus.com/services_need_to_stop_with_the_twitter_kool_aid/#comment-21773013</link><description>Paying customers know how to get support via more traditional channels. But, remember, most of our customers are hard-core geeks and Twitter is the fastest way to interact with a large group of geeks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:25:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Services Need to Stop With the Twitter Kool-Aid</title><link>http://staynalive.disqus.com/services_need_to_stop_with_the_twitter_kool_aid/#comment-21743821</link><description>I agree. The Twitter updates are nice to spread the message to a mass audience, but paying customers deserve a more personal touch and more information.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:53:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Legitimacy of Border Policy</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/the_legitimacy_of_border_policy/#comment-17817712</link><description>You're, pushing-my conception of political sovereignty, over the bor-der-li... ok sorry</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mike_k</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:02:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Legitimacy of Border Policy</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/the_legitimacy_of_border_policy/#comment-17816161</link><description>I guess I might qualify as one of those "defenders of the legitimacy of strong immigration restrictions".   I hope I'm not being obtuse in my analysis of the arguments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't agree with the premise that immigration policy and associated border security are in fact "policies that subject them [foreigners] to state force".   A foreigner becomes subject to immigration policy and border laws when he freely chooses to enter the sovereign territory of a neighbor.   Until such time, he is not subject to state force.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Secondly, to whom do you extend the participatory privilege in defining the immigration laws of a sovereign entity?  To those within 20 miles of a border, 50 miles, 100 miles?  To those that express a desire to emigrate in 1 year, 2 years, 5 years?  Where do you draw the border line (pun intended)?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:36:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ryan&amp;#8217;s Lifestream Digest for July 22nd</title><link>http://xlog.disqus.com/ryan8217s_lifestream_digest_for_july_22nd/#comment-13869979</link><description>Steve, it's easy.  I'll have to write up my system sometime.  Almost everything I do online is captured and posted to multiple sites automatically for me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 02:50:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 3G Launch &amp;#8212; Frustrations of a loyal Apple customer</title><link>http://xlog.disqus.com/iphone_3g_launch_8212_frustrations_of_a_loyal_apple_customer/#comment-10956953</link><description>RJ, don't need Apple to feel anything however, I am an unapologetic fan.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:09:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/05/dinosaur-adobe-manually-reviews.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_093/#comment-10477461</link><description>I guess ironically (as I am just reading this post today--thx to Liveflows for the recommendation), I ran into the same thing yesterday.  I purchased on of the Adobe CS suites, and had to wait until business hours (PDT) today to actually have the transaction approved.  On a positive note, it was approved in one business day and I downloaded the 6.3GB .dmg.  Thank goodness for the Verizon FiOS 50/20Mbps plan.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 04:15:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Is There a Get Out of MobileMe Free Card?</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_is_there_a_get_out_of_mobileme_free_card/#comment-4398953</link><description>$50/yr per user (or mailbox) is for the Premier version. The Standard version (which has the same storage limits as regular Gmail is free.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I ran into too many limitations of having just 1 user account on the Premier service (such as a low limit on aliases) so I switched back to the Standard (free) version.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Louis Gray - I would recommend using Google Apps for Domains for &lt;a href="http://LouisGray.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;LouisGray.com&lt;/a&gt; and making that your primary email address. You can get your content into and out of Google Apps easily as other have said.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RAD Moose</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Is There a Get Out of MobileMe Free Card?</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_is_there_a_get_out_of_mobileme_free_card/#comment-4396603</link><description>Louis, I say use your own domain and have your mail forwarded there. Then you choose who/where your mail is hosted.  My domain's email is hosted by Google. It has been very reliable, offers 25GB of storage and very good SPAM filtering for $50/yr. Since I use an iPhone, MobileMe is still useful for pushing/syncing calendar and Address Book updates automatically--that is all I use it for. Until someone else enables the same functionality, we are stuck with MobileMe. In the interim, forward your &lt;a href="mailto:louisgray@mac.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;louisgray@mac.com&lt;/a&gt; --&amp;gt; @louisgray.com while you transition.  Happy to talk to you about a smooth transition.  I have done this a few times personally and at work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:21:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SocialToo Announces SocialSurveys!</title><link>http://staynalive.disqus.com/socialtoo_announces_socialsurveys/#comment-3892016</link><description>very cool Jesse!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:10:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Prop 8 Tangles Religion, Tech and Politics</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_prop_8_tangles_religion_tech_and_politics/#comment-3303214</link><description>Louis, I too am LDS, and although I do not live in California, I have had an opportunity to discuss the conflict many of my LDS friends in California feel with regards to this issue.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not since the ERA in the 70's has the LDS Church been so vocal on a "political" topic.  I was very young when the ERA was being considered, but I remember the conversations with my parents around our dinner table.   The ERA had a big impact on members of the LDS church and caused divisions amongst them right down party lines.  I get the sense the debate on Prop 8 is different--not dividing by party lines, but dividing acquaintances, friendships and families.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't have an answer for you, but I want to simply thank you for sharing, if only by proxy, the deep thought and intense struggle so many in the religious community have over political issues.  Your post raises the level of discourse and debate. Your post demonstrates to anyone who thinks that a belief in God and adherence to religious principles, or a specific religion, creates hegemonic automatons incapable of rational thought, is simply not true.    &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think on this particular issue the opposition has successfully labeled it a "civil rights struggle" and those that support it as intolerant.   It may be intellectually appealing to equate, as Robert Scoble suggests, the Gay, Lesbian and Bi-sexual lifestyle to a civil-rights issue,  but I think many civil rights leaders would take exception to the comparison.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a conservative, my concern is with elevating a lifestyle to minority status--which has implications far beyond gay marriage.   To do so creates a precedence for any segment of the population to define itself as a "minority" and to then seek redress from the government.  Where do we as a society draw the line?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you again for posting.  May God gives us all the wisdom to what is right as we wrestle with tough issues.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:45:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: BackType Launches Widgets and Alerts to Extend Comments Tracker</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_backtype_launches_widgets_and_alerts_to_extend_comments_tracker/#comment-2746599</link><description>This is solved. All I needed to do was claim the comments as my own,  &lt;br&gt;and my BackType account is unified. Thanks for letting me know.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">louismg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:36:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: BackType Launches Widgets and Alerts to Extend Comments Tracker</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_backtype_launches_widgets_and_alerts_to_extend_comments_tracker/#comment-2746563</link><description>Louis, I see you twice on the People page.  Clearly the first one is really you as it leads to &lt;a href="http://www.backtype.com/louisgray" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.backtype.com/louisgray&lt;/a&gt;, but you also show up 4 times by searching your name &lt;a href="http://www.backtype.com/people?q=louis+gray" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.backtype.com/people?q=louis+gray&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These look like unclaimed comments, but could be confusing.  I see Om Malik has the same issue??</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:28:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: This Financial Scenario Says There Are No Experts</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_this_financial_scenario_says_there_are_no_experts/#comment-2746378</link><description>Louis, your comments about holding too long are ringing painfully in my ears as I think back to AAPL @ $190+, and thinking I needed to sell, wait for the iPhone 3g launch, watch the stock fall as it almost alwasy does AFTER the Apple announcements and ride it back up.  I  think I decided to play golf that day instead.  Painful lesson.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree to stick with companies and sectors you know well.  If we have learned anything from this mess, it should be:  As wonderful as access to information and the speed and efficiency with which information travels, transparency hasn't really improved.  Transparency is what any investor needs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:57:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Five Creatively Obnoxious Things to Do With Social Media</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_five_creatively_obnoxious_things_to_do_with_social_media/#comment-2729032</link><description>Awesome.  with some scripting and web 2.0 creativity maybe a mashup of all 5</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 03:09:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lipstick on a pig :-) (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/lipstick_on_a_pig_scripting_news/#comment-2379352</link><description>Its a new low for Dems.  Disgusting and Dave you should be ashamed of yourself, but of course you aren't and will no doubt make a smug and condescending comment.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FWIW, I am outta here too.  I imagine there are many more like me that will go quietly.  I respected your support for political candidates and  positions that I don't agree with.  What a shame that such a talented mind is so blinded by a perverse political view.  BTW, don't try to push the BS that Republicans do it too or do it more often or better or are more mean spirited.  Didn't you believe Obama was different, that his message was uplifting and inspiring?  Would Obama want this despicable garbage spread on his behalf?  You dishonor him, the party and yourself by posting this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I will check back to see how your are holding up after Obama loses the election in the great tradition of so many Democrats before him.  You just don't get it and probably never will.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:46:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why iPhone is an ureliable platform (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/why_iphone_is_an_ureliable_platform_scripting_news/#comment-2372500</link><description>Wow, Dave Winer just said the most powerful platform is the LEAST regulated one.  Somebody pinch me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 01:30:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The iPhone App Store Should Let You Try Before You Buy</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_the_iphone_app_store_should_let_you_try_before_you_buy/#comment-2189923</link><description>Louis, this is a great idea that will create even more success for Apple and the app dev community.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:53:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Palin vetting continues (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/the_palin_vetting_continues_scripting_news/#comment-2000146</link><description>It will be funny is when she is inaugurated as VP and you libs realize that you live in your own little bubble and that none of this mattered.  i cant wait.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:41:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Starting a High Tech Business: Sell Before You're Ready</title><link>http://windley.disqus.com/starting_a_high_tech_business_sell_before_youre_ready/#comment-1738174</link><description>great article as we are in the same boat.  It would appear in every product manager their are two competing voices.  The traditional product manager in me says, "Wait, slow down, let's not sell before we define our roadmap, market requirements, pricing, etc.".  The "agile" (and experienced) product manager in me says, "is there any better way to define market requirements, gather input for the roadmap and determine what the market will bear on price."  Sell away!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:26:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yeah of course it's about the oil and that's all it's about (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/yeah_of_course_its_about_the_oil_and_thats_all_its_about_scripting_news/#comment-907579</link><description>It never was about oil.  As was already pointed out, we could have just bought it from Saddam and now we could just take it, but we don't.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:01:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Modern Liberals Think</title><link>http://xlog.disqus.com/how_modern_liberals_think/#comment-903756</link><description>Gregory, I think that is part of his point.  There is right and wrong, good and bad in the world today, but many are incapable of differentiating them.  The ability to see the structure in the world, and distinguish between right and wrong, and then act on that as is maturity born from experience.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:10:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed: A Guide for Twitter Users</title><link>http://staynalive.disqus.com/thread_781/#comment-794999</link><description>You choose - I'll see it either way.  If you're on Friendfeed and like to&lt;br&gt;comment there, comment via friendfeed - I do really like comments on&lt;br&gt;FriendFeed because IMO at it's current stage it's more social and viral.&lt;br&gt;However, Disqus isn't so bad either and soon will integrate right with&lt;br&gt;FriendFeed, so I hear.  I'm toying with both for now and we'll see which one&lt;br&gt;makes more sense in the long run.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jessestay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:15:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed: A Guide for Twitter Users</title><link>http://staynalive.disqus.com/thread_781/#comment-794963</link><description>Jesse, great post.  Do your readers get confused over whether to post a comment via Disqus or FriendFeed on your blog?  Where do you prefer the comments?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rpetty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:06:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>