<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for richiepear</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-7aae13f3" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/richiepear/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:58:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Reader Steals the Conversation with New Commenting Feature</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/03/11/google-reader-comments/#comment-7124632</link><description>Any estimates on how long until ads start appearing in Google Reader?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richiepear</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:58:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FairShare.cc - Track Your Creative Commons | Visit fairshare</title><link>http://www.killerstartups.com/Web-App-Tools/fairshare-cc-track-your-creative-commons#comment-6871490</link><description>Thanks for the review.  To answer your question,  FairShare supports   Austrian, Czech, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian and Spanish.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richiepear</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:45:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Study: Stolen Web Content Sees More Traffic Than The Original</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8158/study-stolen-web-content-sees-more-traffic-than-the-original/#comment-3760028</link><description>Hi John,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually it's not excerpts  - the study excluded any reuse that was below 125 words or below 50% of the original article.  All quotes are automatically excluded as well.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We actually determine if links are present as well, and I agree with you about the numerous benefits  - this wasn't the focus of this study but you can read a post on it here:  &lt;a href="http://www.attributor.com/blog/the-link-is-mightier-than-the-take-down-notice/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.attributor.com/blog/the-link-is-migh...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richiepear</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:02:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Study: Stolen Web Content Sees More Traffic Than The Original</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/8158/study-stolen-web-content-sees-more-traffic-than-the-original/#comment-3745674</link><description>Great point on blogs (disclaimer that I work for Attributor) - one of the new solutions we're proposing is for publishers to work directly with the ad networks and share in revenue made by others.   The concept is that publishers should set their content free and be able to share in the revenue that others make from it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richiepear</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:23:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is the link economy really broken?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/02/is-the-link-economy-really-broken/#comment-2822396</link><description>I agree - ignorance is definitely not a valid excuse anymore - link juice is a mainstream mainstream concept now.  Links equates higher search rank  which leads to more traffic and more ad revenue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm curious if you (or anyone else reading this)  would be interested in a feed that shows you all the sites where your work is re-used without links. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If so, shoot me a note or respond in the comments.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richiepear</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:20:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: The Importance Of Blog Linking Seems to Be Declining</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/07/importance-of-blog-linking-seems-to-be.html#comment-835080</link><description>I agree with Danny - links are the backbone of your organic search ranking which, as your stats suggest, are your dominant traffic driver.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would be interesting to find out if you were actually receiving less links, meaning that fewer bloggers are linking out . . .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richiepear</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 09:52:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogs and the attribution dilemma</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/05/12/blogs-and-the-attribution-dilemma/#comment-454066</link><description>This is spot on, particularly  about links being the life-blood of the web.  Links count for much more  than traffic from click-throughs - they are one of the best indications of page rank and your resulting search engine rank.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richiepear</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 22:17:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sploggers Steal Content, It&amp;#8217;s What They Do</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/sploggers-steal-content-its-what-they-do/#comment-11043</link><description>Steve - I just sent you a mail.  Hopefully, we can talk soon.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richiepear</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:22:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sploggers Steal Content, It&amp;#8217;s What They Do</title><link>http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/sploggers-steal-content-its-what-they-do/#comment-10457</link><description>Steve - wrt minimizing the damage from unattributed copying by other bloggers, I'd propose two tactics&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-  Request a link and/or revenue share if they are placing ads across your content (low likelihood of success against splogers but should work ok for legit bloggers/sites)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-  Send notice to search engines, ad networks and host to remove from index.  (certainly more drastic but when sploggers are appearing higher in search rankings than your original post, this seems appropriate).  While .ru site host may not respond, removal from search engine indexes will make these sites hard to find and ad network removal notices will hit sploggers where it hurts most.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Disclosure that I work for Attributor and we are enabling the above actions.  Interested in your response and how we could make this more useful.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richiepear</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 19:39:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>