<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for richardmnixon</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-3445f945" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/richardmnixon/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:01:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Motorola to split into two companies: One that sucks, another that sucks even more</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/motorola-to-split-into-two-companies.html#comment-267341</link><description>Apple needs to do the same. Sell the Mac division to Microsoft, who knows how to monetize software (though not how to write it), and the iPhone division to Nokia, who won't have the temerity to demand a 30% tithe for all iPhone apps.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That'll leave iPods and AppleTVs for Jobso to wrap in shiny plastic.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:01:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brian Lam, you are sofa king cool</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/brian-lam-you-are-sofa-king-cool.html#comment-266655</link><description>The Gizmodo komodos are the worst turd polishing Apple worshipers around. They make Mossberg look like a journalist, for chrissake.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:34:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clive Crook, please put your head back into your ass</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/clive-crook-please-put-your-head-back.html#comment-266536</link><description>Clive Crook used to be deputy editor of The Economist and now works for the Atlantic Monthly. Talk about a downgrade. That's like a MacBook Air without an optical drive OR ethernet OR a replaceable battery.....oh, wait.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:07:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bing blows. There, I said it.</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/bing-blows-there-i-said-it.html#comment-262012</link><description>Bing seems right on target. The MacBook Air is hobbleware. Jobs released it for one reason: to see how powerful his reality distortion field has gotten. By the looks of the other comments here, it's stronger than ever.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:35:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Larry Page, friend of the environment</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/larry-page-friend-of-environment.html#comment-258922</link><description>You forgot to mention Larry and Sergei's Boeing 767, which has "Don't be evil" emblazoned on the jet engine exhaust ports and on all the toilet seats.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:29:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Larry Page, friend of the environment</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/larry-page-friend-of-environment.html#comment-258909</link><description>If a recent energy bill can subsidize oil companies at a time of windfall profits, Congress should have the guts to just directly subsidize Google. You could call it Tax-Per-Click: every Google user would pay two dollars per ad-click to the feds, who would give half of it to Google, who would then contribute half of that to the congressional campaigns of those who voted for Tax-Per-Click. It's called the Circle of Life. Have you heard of it?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:26:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Larry Page, friend of the environment</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/larry-page-friend-of-environment.html#comment-258864</link><description>&lt;i&gt;Google server farms are second to none in efficiency&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's highly debatable. Their homebrewed server boxes are certainly not the most efficient out there, though they have cost advantages and aren't someone else's proprietary solution, which would have downsides.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:15:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If Hillary is elected</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/if-hillary-is-elected.html#comment-252706</link><description>Gosh Wuz, I guess I really hurt your teensy weensy feelings, didn't I? Maybe you should get over it, eh? Go back to typing "I'd hit it" under every blog post and wait until someone else raps you for it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:58:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If Hillary is elected</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/if-hillary-is-elected.html#comment-251858</link><description>And now you have to settle for riding around in Bono's Gulfstream V to the various Live Earth emissionfests. I'd say more methane gas has come out of you and &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Gore%2C_Sr." rel="nofollow"&gt;your father&lt;/a&gt; than all the cows in Texas.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:15:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Martha Stewart raves about MacBook Air. I just threw up in my mouth.</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/martha-stewart-raves-about-macbook-air.html#comment-251616</link><description>You guys have definitely turned this place into commentard paradise. Great work. All the funny commentors, like Putin, are gone. Well, you won't have Nixon to kick around anymore, kiddies.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:56:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If Hillary is elected</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/if-hillary-is-elected.html#comment-251512</link><description>When I was President, I told the Secret Service to trade my 707 in for a B-52 with a complete load of nukes. I wanted to be able to put that whole Kent State "massacre" in perspective if necessary. But for some reason you can't fit an escape pod &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; Kissinger's shemale entourage &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; a full complement of bombs in there at the same time. They said I'd also have trouble landing in Peking and Moscow without getting shot down.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:26:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The real story: Charlie Rose attacked by Andrea Jung</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/real-story-charlie-rose-attacked-by.html#comment-244803</link><description>Rose needs to do some ads along the lines of Tareyton Cigarette's "Rather Fight Than Switch" commercials. After all, he's still shilling shamelessly for his main corporate sponsor, the CocaCola Company.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:00:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About</title><link>http://blog.disqus.net/about/#comment-238449</link><description>Hey, which tools do you guys use to implement Disqus? In any case, nice work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One small complaint: the new feature where profiles pop-up when you mouse-over a commentor's picture in a thread is a poor UI choice. In general, stuff that pops-up when you merely mouse-over it is a mistake, and an increasingly common one on the web these days.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:00:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google talking smack about iPhone. Translation: They're scared shitless</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/google-talking-smack-about-iphone.html#comment-237537</link><description>This is Mac and Windows all over again: however superior the iPhone is, it's going to be stuck in a niche because of Apple's stupid boutique business model. Google is liable to clean up in the huge mobile ad revenue space because they license Android to every handset maker and put out an SDK &lt;i&gt;before&lt;/i&gt; the products ship, not almost a year after.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Joe Sixpack will be able to afford an iClone, and the iPhone will end up in the Computer Museum, right next to the NeXT Cube.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:55:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I sympathize with Heather Mills</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/i-sympathize-with-heather-mills.html#comment-237451</link><description>McCartney should start carrying pictures of Chairman Mao, who actually reminded me of that Beatle bastard.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:30:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google talking smack about iPhone. Translation: They're scared shitless</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/google-talking-smack-about-iphone.html#comment-237433</link><description>If Android phones just match iPhone features or even fall a little short, they'll still beat you, Jobso, for one simple reason: they aren't going to cost $400-500 and $60-100/month. And they'll probably have 3G. And you won't have to break the thing to use someone other than AT&amp;T.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just think: a variety of ad supported iPhone clones for $200 and $20/month. I'd start shorting AAPL shares now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:24:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some British soccer team uses Macs and everyone wants me to know</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/some-british-soccer-team-uses-macs-and.html#comment-237349</link><description>You know when you can consider yourself a success, Jobso? When people stop being amazed to spot a Mac user. "Oh, look! A Scientologist! Where's my camera?"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:02:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gail Collins declares her stupidity</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/gail-collins-declares-her-stupidity.html#comment-228022</link><description>The Wall Street guys were already rationalizing their dishonesty before Spitzer's fall. Any bets on how soon someone files to reverse their conviction/settlement because of this?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:10:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gail Collins declares her stupidity</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/gail-collins-declares-her-stupidity.html#comment-227642</link><description>Look around. People in these comments are taking it plenty seriously, as if it was Spitzer who stole their &lt;a href="http://Pets.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Pets.com&lt;/a&gt; shares.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:28:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gail Collins declares her stupidity</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/gail-collins-declares-her-stupidity.html#comment-227513</link><description>Let's say Jobs was being investigated for murder (and god willing he will be someday :) ). I don't think he'd spend a lot of ink in his blog about how O.J. Simpson was railroaded by ambitious overreaching prosecutors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People who've been investigated for securities fraud generally don't rush to the defense of people who're guilty of securities fraud.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Spitzer's sins don't excuse the sins of his targets, and it's amazing that some people think they do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:56:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gail Collins declares her stupidity</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/gail-collins-declares-her-stupidity.html#comment-227407</link><description>In this case I think we're clearly hearing from Lyons, as with Obamamania. I don't see the real Steve rushing to defend the folks Spitzer went after, but I do see a guy who lives in an environment like Forbes doing so.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:18:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gail Collins declares her stupidity</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/gail-collins-declares-her-stupidity.html#comment-227349</link><description>Part of the shame of this episode is that people are now tempted to sympathize with Wall Street cheats -- people who deserve no sympathy whatsoever. For that, Spitzer deserves all that's coming to him, just like I deserve hell for making people sympathize with Alger Hiss.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:01:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gail Collins declares her stupidity</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/gail-collins-declares-her-stupidity.html#comment-227329</link><description>Exactly which innocent people are we talking about Jobsy? Name one. And why would a writer for Forbes rush to defend the Wall Street jerks who nearly destroyed confidence in their own vaunted system?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just because Spitzer was a whoremonger a-hole who exploited the venal dishonesty of the money men to cynically advance his career doesn't mean the money men were innocent. And when it comes to corruption, I'll take a whorebanger any day over an investment banker who lies to investors en masse to line his own pockets with billions. The only shame is that those guys got off too easy. If they'd held up a liquor store for $100, they'd be doing hard time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:56:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gail Collins declares her stupidity</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/gail-collins-declares-her-stupidity.html#comment-227288</link><description>Gosh, yeah, Richard Strong was as &lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/moneymag_archive/2003/12/01/354980/index.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;honest as Jobs&lt;/a&gt; here, and the &lt;a href="http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2004-69.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;SEC was in cahoots&lt;/a&gt; in bringing him down. They must all be whoremongers too, &lt;a href="http://securities.stanford.edu/1028/SCMI03-01/" rel="nofollow"&gt;along with these guys&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:43:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wal-Mart yanks Linux PC, cites lack of childlike wonder</title><link>http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2008/03/wal-mart-yanks-linux-pc-cites-lack-of.html#comment-222211</link><description>Hey, it's not the fault of the Linux nerds that Joe Trailerhitch doesn't know how to recompile the Linux kernel and edit a dozen configuration files using "vi" to just get his video driver to work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My entire taping system ran on Linux, and Rosemary Woods could run it just fine.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardmnixon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:12:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>