<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of reechard</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/reechard/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:21:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: About Afghanistan&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/11/11/about-afghanistan/#comment-22785881</link><description>I'm not a fan of crop substitution, but it's worth noting that in 2001 (when the Taliban was in power), the opium exports dropped to nearly zero. That proves to me that a strong government (not necessarily totalitarian, but strong) can influence the opium trade in a negative fashion. In a 2009 survey done in June, over 80% of Afghans said they had faith in the Afghan Army, and over 70% in the Afghan police. That tells me that there has been progress in training and raising local support for a strong government. Karzai, in my opinion, is not the strongest leader Afghanistan could have. He is, however, what they've got for the time being. The question is whether or not a counterinsurgency effort could build the Afghan army and police force to a point where, when combined with strong leadership, they could actually be successful at self-governance and eradication (or at least, strong diminishment) of the opium trade in favor of other moneymaking ventures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I totally agree with you about the cultural aspects being important and being a strength Obama has on his side. One of the reasons I wrote this post was a) to start a discussion about the different aspects of this decision and b) to make the case that if he does choose to send additional troops, it's a decision made within the frame of a cultural understanding. He's a very intelligent man who is listening to all sides of the debate. I don't believe he will just willy-nilly send troops in there without a plan, a goal, and a timeline.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:21:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: About Afghanistan&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/11/11/about-afghanistan/#comment-22780823</link><description>My problem is that much of what has happened over the past 30 years is the clear result of a chaotic and self-serving American policy there. We support them before we don't. We neglect them before we pay attention before we neglect them again. Until 2005, we had a real opportunity there, but because the Bush administration deemed Iraq more important than Afghanistan, they simply didn't pay attention.  Combine that with the commonly advanced meme that it's an ungovernable country (it's not), and confusion reigns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Really, for me, the question is whether we can undo some of the damage done, and in the process, use leverage in Afghanistan to stabilize the region.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:06:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Telecommuting Should Be An Option for Everyone</title><link>http://dcfemella.com/blog/2009/06/telecommuting-should-be-an-option-for-everyone/#comment-22763825</link><description>Telecommuting is becoming more and more apparent to companies.  However, as with many things, people are resistant to change.  With cloud computing and the pressure to "go green," I think telecommuting is going to start becoming increasingly more popular.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dcfemella</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:45:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: So What if I&amp;#8217;m Single?</title><link>http://dcfemella.com/blog/2009/11/single/#comment-22738884</link><description>Haha! That is how it is when I am trying to explain to my aunts the difference between the two as well.  They look at me like I'm talking a different language.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dcfemella</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:20:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: So What if I&amp;#8217;m Single?</title><link>http://dcfemella.com/blog/2009/11/single/#comment-22735371</link><description>It seems like it infects every major city.  One of the reasons why I don't understand why everyone is acting like I'm someone who needs sympathy when in cities, people usually remain single longer. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks! =D</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dcfemella</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:02:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey Toronto, Want To Reduce Traffic? Invest In Telecommuting</title><link>http://www.sheysmith.com/2009/11/10/hey-toronto-want-to-reduce-traffic-invest-in-telecommuting/#comment-22570376</link><description>I can't find it.  I get the actual INC magazine and it was in there.  I meant to say Fried from 37Signals. haha</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dcfemella</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:42:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Crucial Social Media Widgets To Improve Content Traffic And Awareness</title><link>http://shegeeks.net/10-crucial-social-media-widgets-to-improve-content-traffic-and-awareness/#comment-22481822</link><description>Thanks for the tip Mark. I added into the post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Corvida</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:39:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Thoughts on Posterous as a Lifestreaming Platform</title><link>http://lifestreamblog.com/my-thoughts-on-posterous-as-a-lifestreaming-platform/#comment-22419823</link><description>Ileane, thank you for the kind words and sharing the story.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">krynsky</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:26:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22256194</link><description>Awesome points. Congrats on building the best Twitter app on the Android platform, by the way. I'll keep with it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:36:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22255508</link><description>When we play the YouTube videos (same video, same UI) the ones on the Palm Pre, the HTC Touch, the iPhone are much higher resolution than the ones that play on the Droid. Yes, they are NOT "true HD" but they are very sharp and very good looking. Not on the Droid. They look like ass on the Droid.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:15:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22255207</link><description>This is a major reason why I bought one. I think Apple needs competition. That's healthy for all of us. So, totally agree with you on that point.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:04:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22254886</link><description>Hah, I don't like Wave so I've been ignoring that. But I think you are right on. Google is making big plays to stick its foot into enterprises. Microsoft better watch out here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:52:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22254830</link><description>It's not quite that simple, though. Google has a better platform-building team and approach. This is why Android has come in late into the market and already gotten more than 10,000 apps built for it (something that Microsoft, Nokia, Palm and others have failed to do, by the way). The platform eventually wins. Or at least that's been true so far. That beautiful Mac? It was cloned "enough" by Microsoft and Microsoft's superior platform approach led it to 90% marketshare. Being beautiful and usable is NOT enough!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:50:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22254704</link><description>That said, my new Toyota Prius has a very good GPS system, so I don't need turn-by-turn the way other people might.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:45:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22254689</link><description>Ahh, yes, I just forgot about that. We talked about Google's Maps in the podcast. I'll add that as another good thing about Droid (turn-by-turn directions and street-level views rock on the Droid).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:44:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22254154</link><description>Mark: yes. That's why I feel Android is Windows 3.1. It's ugly. But you can see the future is going to be very bright. Developers ARE supporting Android in a big way. It's their second platform, I've been interviewing a ton of them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:42:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22254045</link><description>Another good point I should have made in my article. No, the Droid can't do simultaneous voice and data (I believe this is due to the EVDO network that Verizon uses). Good points about getting service in rural areas. I don't use a phone in rural areas very often.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:38:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22254003</link><description>I'll switch my iPhone over to Verizon too if it goes. The network is noticeably better in Half Moon Bay. Ironic, too, because I know of a major Apple exec who lives just down the road from me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:36:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22253946</link><description>As to Symbian, that OS is not up to the standards of Android. But Symbian will be the market share winner for a long time (Nokia sells a ton of single-chip phones to emerging markets that don't even know what a web browser is).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:35:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22253925</link><description>Weird, on Facebook (the Web page, not the app) the double-click on photo thing wasn't working for some reason. Very frustrating. The zoom control did work, though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:34:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22253874</link><description>I don't think Android will pass iPhone unless something spectacular happens next year and I don't think it will. Everyone in China says Apple has locked up the best supply chain, so building a better device than Apple isn't in the cards. That said, I'd expect Android to grow faster percentage wise than Apple next year.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:32:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22253683</link><description>I live in a small town with 14,000 people. Here Verizon is a LOT better than AT&amp;T.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:25:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22253658</link><description>These are good reasons to stay! Thanks, I was hoping I'd find more of them because I sure feel like returning this and know I need to keep it to stay up-to-date on Android.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:24:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22253612</link><description>Ryan: wrong question. Because if market share mattered we'd all be on Nokia.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:22:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22253485</link><description>Oh, absolutely! Even Apple fans who would never consider switching have to love the competition. Why? It will force Apple to get better. The screen on the Droid really shows that Apple needs a push. Wow is that thing beautiful!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:18:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>