<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of qamanager</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/qamanager/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:04:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Trends That Are Influencing The Future Of Work</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/trends-that-are-influencing-the-future-of-work.htm#comment-22694217</link><description>Angie,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For more on this topic, check out Jason Fried's (37Signals) article "How I&lt;br&gt;Work" in this month's Inc. or Dan Pink's TED talk on the new paradigm for&lt;br&gt;work and motivation. You're right, companies that figure out how to give&lt;br&gt;their employees autonomy and freedom will win in the long run. 37Signals is&lt;br&gt;the best example of that - they're leading the way in "new work styles".&lt;br&gt;I'll check out your post in a few. I'm sure it's full of great insights. In&lt;br&gt;the mean time, check out Jason's piece in Inc. :&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.inc.com/magazine/20091101/the-way-i-work-jason-fried-of-37signals.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.inc.com/magazine/20091101/the-way-i-...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:04:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using New Media, New Marketing, and New Thinking to Create Bestselling Books</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/using-new-media-new-marketing-and-new-thinking-to-create-bestselling-books.htm#comment-22693727</link><description>Thanks for the kind words. I agree, Seth's message is strong in Tribes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:47:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 100+ Killer Wordpress Resources</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/100-killer-wordpress-resources.htm#comment-22692566</link><description>You're welcome. It helped me too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:05:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 100+ Killer Wordpress Resources</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/100-killer-wordpress-resources.htm#comment-22692564</link><description>Glad it did.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:04:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trends That Are Influencing The Future Of Work</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/trends-that-are-influencing-the-future-of-work.htm#comment-21775527</link><description>Obviously you wouldn't volunteer that information out of context&lt;br&gt;of discussions like this. We all fear that our boss would assume that we&lt;br&gt;were being lazy - but that's because of the "you should only be doing&lt;br&gt;productive work from 9-5" mentality. Jason's point is that the assumptions&lt;br&gt;underlying the 40 hour work week and productivity need to be rethought - and&lt;br&gt;I agree with him. Creating the right environment and culture where people&lt;br&gt;feel free to get things done but manage themselves is about acknowledging&lt;br&gt;people's natural rythms, the importance of building unstructured downtime&lt;br&gt;into people's days and letting individuals work when they feel most&lt;br&gt;productive. For example, I'm usually most productive at 3 times during the&lt;br&gt;day - early in the morning 7-11am (I'm a morning person), at the end of the&lt;br&gt;day (3-5pm) and at night (8-11pm). Night sessions are great if I've rested&lt;br&gt;in the afternoon. I'm a big fan of mid day power naps. I don't care what&lt;br&gt;anyone says...a good solid nap during the day can be amazing for getting you&lt;br&gt;in the zone for a really productive work session from 8-midnight. The 8 hour&lt;br&gt;(straight) work day assumes that productivity is maximized when a lot of&lt;br&gt;people are stuck together in clusters for long stretches. I find that that's&lt;br&gt;not the case. This might be true of a manufacturing plant or of workers who&lt;br&gt;do lots of data entry and basic processing tasks, but it's flawed thinking&lt;br&gt;when it comes to people who are doing thought work like&lt;br&gt;writing, analysis, designing or coding. I batch my work into tasks that&lt;br&gt;take up to a few hours each. I make lists of the most important things that&lt;br&gt;need to get done. When I have a block of time, I start on the most important&lt;br&gt;thing and focus on it until it's done. Then I stop and take a break and pick&lt;br&gt;up the next thing. Working in focused bursts, but&lt;br&gt;also allowing for unstructured periods of time in between is important for&lt;br&gt;keeping productivity sustainable. I've seen colleagues burn out quickly when&lt;br&gt;they don't take breaks and try to take on too much all at once. They get&lt;br&gt;overwhelmed and lose focus. Big four accounting was like that, especially&lt;br&gt;during busy season. It ruins the work environment, people get bitter and the&lt;br&gt;work place loses it's energy which can have a powerful negative affect on&lt;br&gt;teams.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:10:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trends That Are Influencing The Future Of Work</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/trends-that-are-influencing-the-future-of-work.htm#comment-21766531</link><description>I thought this quote from Jason Fried in the article was interesting (and&lt;br&gt;true to reality and why results only work environments work better):&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"*After lunch, I get a little lazy between 1 p.m. and 3 p.m. I don't feel&lt;br&gt;that productive, so I'm usually screwing around, which I think is really&lt;br&gt;important. Everyone should read stuff on the Web that's goofy or discover&lt;br&gt;something new. I hate it when businesses treat their employees like&lt;br&gt;children. They block Facebook or YouTube because they want their employees&lt;br&gt;to work eight hours a day. But instead of getting more productivity, you're&lt;br&gt;getting frustration. What's the point? As long as the work gets done, I&lt;br&gt;don't care what people do all day*."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:47:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trends That Are Influencing The Future Of Work</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/trends-that-are-influencing-the-future-of-work.htm#comment-21763520</link><description>Thanks for this link. Great article. Seriously....how great is 37Signals.&lt;br&gt;These guys are considered the extreme now, but you know what, they'll for&lt;br&gt;sure be the norm soon because they're doing it right.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:50:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Good To Be The Guru!</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/mayors-and-gurus.htm#comment-21763245</link><description>We still need to meet one of these days though. Let me know if you're ever&lt;br&gt;in SoCal.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:45:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Focusing On Value: How I&amp;#8217;m Changing How I Use Twitter</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/focusing-on-value-how-im-changing-how-i-use-twitter.htm#comment-21480634</link><description>David. I hope you do. Since I've limited my following, my click through rate&lt;br&gt;is actually UP from before. I'm connecting with more people, I get&lt;br&gt;absolutely no spam and I've been having a lot more fun. Good luck to you. If&lt;br&gt;you need any advice on how to best go about rebooting, let me know. I'm&lt;br&gt;happy to help.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:09:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Music</title><link>http://www.marketing.fm/2009/10/28/google-music/#comment-21386708</link><description>Me too. If you have any insights after you see the data, please share them. I'm curious how this is actually going to play out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:01:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Focusing On Value: How I&amp;#8217;m Changing How I Use Twitter</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/focusing-on-value-how-im-changing-how-i-use-twitter.htm#comment-21380403</link><description>Glad you enjoyed the post. Yes, search is a great way to find the stuff&lt;br&gt;you're interested in. filtering and focus on twitter to get value out of it&lt;br&gt;is key. Hopefully we'll start to see more innovation around real time search&lt;br&gt;in the months to come.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:29:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trends That Are Influencing The Future Of Work</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/trends-that-are-influencing-the-future-of-work.htm#comment-21378627</link><description>That would be great - can you send me his contact info? Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:08:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trends That Are Influencing The Future Of Work</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/trends-that-are-influencing-the-future-of-work.htm#comment-21378366</link><description>Mark - Just wait to see what happens when Cisco brings telepresence to the&lt;br&gt;mass market. The entire concept of an office is going to be completely&lt;br&gt;turned on its head.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:06:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trends That Are Influencing The Future Of Work</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/trends-that-are-influencing-the-future-of-work.htm#comment-21378257</link><description>I think so too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:05:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Good To Be The Guru!</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/mayors-and-gurus.htm#comment-21075075</link><description>I agree, Vada. I'm a big believer in game theory as the adaptiveblue guys&lt;br&gt;have implemented it. Status, reputation, reward for positive behaviors are&lt;br&gt;all part of successful community building. I can't think of a single online&lt;br&gt;community that doesn't have these values ingrained in the system somewhere.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:17:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I&amp;#8217;m Keeping Facebook a Friends-Only Affair</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/why-im-keeping-facebook-a-friends-only-affair.htm#comment-21053021</link><description>Rob - Exactly. People who are on social media to push are completely missing&lt;br&gt;the point and missing a huge opportunity to create connections, add value&lt;br&gt;and build relationships.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:03:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hitwise Data Shows That We&amp;#8217;re All Twittered Out</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/hitwise-data-shows-that-were-all-twittered-out.htm#comment-20895544</link><description>Andrea - I think your concerns are valid. I'm not sure how Twitter's&lt;br&gt;partnership with Bing will really benefit the black hat SEO crew, but it&lt;br&gt;will certainly add noise to the system. The one thing I think the rise of&lt;br&gt;social search does mean is that customers will have increasing influence&lt;br&gt;over Search Results that affect Brands&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://bit.ly/2PegQZ" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://bit.ly/2PegQZ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think there's a lot of potential and merit to what they're trying to do,&lt;br&gt;but until they can figure out a way to implement it in a simple, elegant&lt;br&gt;way, I don't see this adding much value. The current implementation looks&lt;br&gt;sloppy and thrown together IMO. We'll see.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:19:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Focusing On Value: How I&amp;#8217;m Changing How I Use Twitter</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/focusing-on-value-how-im-changing-how-i-use-twitter.htm#comment-20701580</link><description>I don't believe that the answer about the value (or lack thereof) of&lt;br&gt;following lots of people is quite as obvious as you seem to think it is.&lt;br&gt;Everyone uses Twitter a little bit differently - and if the ability to drive&lt;br&gt;traffic in big numbers was supported by the data, a lot of people (including&lt;br&gt;me) might be singing a different tune. While it seems intuitive that&lt;br&gt;"following more than a few hundred people" kills the value, there are many&lt;br&gt;tools out there like Tweetdeck and Hootsuite that allow you to filter your&lt;br&gt;list for your favorite people, searches etc</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:26:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hitwise Data Shows That We&amp;#8217;re All Twittered Out</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/hitwise-data-shows-that-were-all-twittered-out.htm#comment-20503300</link><description>It does look like they're betting on re-energizing the community with lists&lt;br&gt;- my guess is that it's going to spark temporary interest and then stagnate.&lt;br&gt;They still haven't figured out the conversational dynamics (which I think is&lt;br&gt;what's really hurting them). FriendFeed and Facebook's organization of&lt;br&gt;conversations still beats the heck out of Twitter which may be the crucial&lt;br&gt;factor. We'll see.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:04:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Focusing On Value: How I&amp;#8217;m Changing How I Use Twitter</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/focusing-on-value-how-im-changing-how-i-use-twitter.htm#comment-20349629</link><description>Mark - You've hit the nail on the head right here...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"That change was not due to fewer new people following me, that number&lt;br&gt;stayed constant, but because the ratio of people who actually use Twitter to&lt;br&gt;build relationships (instead of broadcast spam) dropped from 90% to 5%".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I noticed it happening in early summer myself. And I was dying to try&lt;br&gt;rebooting for months. I'm actually glad I did though. Believe it or not, my&lt;br&gt;click through rate has actually gone up (I'm connecting more with people&lt;br&gt;that matter), my spam completely stopped and the utility I get out of&lt;br&gt;Tweetdeck and lists is way up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:19:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Focusing On Value: How I&amp;#8217;m Changing How I Use Twitter</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/focusing-on-value-how-im-changing-how-i-use-twitter.htm#comment-20320282</link><description>Paul - Popularity shouldn't be the goal. Engaging people and building&lt;br&gt;relationships matters most. We see the evidence that popularity strategies&lt;br&gt;dont work clearly in the numbers. People with a few hundred followers&lt;br&gt;(average) are getting similar click through rates to people with tens of&lt;br&gt;thousands of followers. The size of your tribe doesn't matter nearly as much&lt;br&gt;as how many of them are listening.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:02:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Focusing On Value: How I&amp;#8217;m Changing How I Use Twitter</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/focusing-on-value-how-im-changing-how-i-use-twitter.htm#comment-20319976</link><description>Paul - Popularity shouldn't be the goal. Engaging people and building&lt;br&gt;relationships matters most. We see the evidence that popularity strategies&lt;br&gt;dont work clearly in the numbers. People with a few hundred followers&lt;br&gt;(average) are getting similar click through rates to people with tens of&lt;br&gt;thousands of followers. The size of your tribe doesn't matter nearly as much&lt;br&gt;as how many of them are listening.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:02:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Focusing On Value: How I&amp;#8217;m Changing How I Use Twitter</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/focusing-on-value-how-im-changing-how-i-use-twitter.htm#comment-20265992</link><description>Chris,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You hit on an important point that I tried to stress in the beginning of the&lt;br&gt;article. Reciprocity (following back) actually DID work in the earlier eras&lt;br&gt;of Twitter. I think partly because it was new and exciting, and partly&lt;br&gt;because of WHO was on it (the geeks and early adopters) and the culture and&lt;br&gt;engagement they brought. Now it's a whole different ball game and it's not&lt;br&gt;impractical. Thanks for recognizing the difference.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Re: Twitter vs. Facebook. I've got a long article that talks specifically&lt;br&gt;about the difference between Facebook and Twitter that mirrors the points&lt;br&gt;you made in your comment. I'd happily continue the discussion with you on&lt;br&gt;that post if you're game.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:17:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Focusing On Value: How I&amp;#8217;m Changing How I Use Twitter</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/focusing-on-value-how-im-changing-how-i-use-twitter.htm#comment-20239266</link><description>We'll have to discuss further over beers and tacos maybe? :-D</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:33:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Focusing On Value: How I&amp;#8217;m Changing How I Use Twitter</title><link>http://blog.steffanantonas.com/focusing-on-value-how-im-changing-how-i-use-twitter.htm#comment-20238710</link><description>Dorrine - you're right, "intimacy" might not be quite the right word. I'm trying to say connection and engagement. I also use Twitter to learn and listen a lot, but I find that the people I pay attention to most are the ones I trust (because I know them well or I know of them and trust their reputation etc). You're spot on with this...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"what makes Social Media so rewarding and exciting is the constant challenge of closely held ideas and opinions."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well said.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steffanantonas</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:16:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>