<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for pwinn</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/pwinn/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/pwinn/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 12:54:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Opinion: My take on everything Apple announced at WWDC 2019</title><link>https://9to5mac.com/2019/06/04/everything-apple-announced-at-wwdc/#comment-4489131915</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The calculator seems like such a basic and essentially app that it's literally unbelievable that it isn't included on the iPad. And yet, it isn't. Really. It boggles the mind, but it really isn't there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 12:54:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Photos: Galleria Dallas Apple Store celebrates grand opening</title><link>https://9to5mac.com/2019/04/13/apple-store-galleria-dallas-grand-opening-photos/#comment-4433444815</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's "15 minutes *from* downtown," not to. And yeah, right now from El Centro College to Galleria Dallas is 14 minutes, for example. I work across the street from the Galleria, and 15 minutes *to* downtown is pretty typical outside of rush hour, too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Legacy West is literally between the two now-closed locations, so what conceivable reason could Apple have for moving there?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2019 10:54:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to check iPhone photo orientation before taking a picture</title><link>https://9to5mac.com/2019/04/17/check-iphone-photo-orientation/#comment-4427301303</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Or, instead of focusing on thin text inside a uniformly round shape against whatever your lens is pointed at, you could look at the camera icon, high-contrast white on black and very near the shutter button, and make sure the shape is horizontal.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 19:14:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: “I Spent the First 19 Years of my Life Defending my Virginity!”</title><link>https://lithub.com/i-spent-the-first-19-years-of-my-life-defending-my-virginity/#comment-3932904363</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cody and Seth, please, I beg of you, shut up. This article wasn't about you, or about men at all. The women commenting are being polite and not pointing out how ridiculous your comments seem, but as a fellow man: your asinine comments say nothing more than that you think everything is centered on and focused at you as a man.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not every space needs your perspective as a man. This space clearly doesn't. Read the essay, and either learn from it or don't. Whichever you do, please, do it without commenting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 10:34:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taiwanese sources illustrate likely depth of impact on supply-chain of iPhone 8 sales</title><link>https://9to5mac.com/2017/09/04/taiwanese-sources-illustrate-likely-depth-of-impact-on-supply-chain-of-iphone-8-sales/#comment-3501579354</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Today, right now, I am already paying $41.58/month to Apple for the mid-sized iPhone 7 Plus, in lieu of $869 up front.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Other people are paying $45.75/month to Apple for the largest iPhone 7 Plus, which is $969.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If a new iPhone starts at $999, that's less than two dollars more per month for those other people, or maybe an extra six bucks a month more for me. Not hard to find that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 10:54:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Peninsula Group launches thermal printer label drivers for macOS</title><link>https://www.appleworld.today/blog/2017/2/20/peninsula-group-launches-thermal-printer-label-drivers-for-macos#comment-3166213708</link><description>&lt;p&gt;$97 for a single computer, so pretty far from "free."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:17:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Opinion: Why Apple’s statement on Irish tax ruling seems tone-deaf, but nothing will happen anytime soon</title><link>https://9to5mac.com/2016/08/30/apple-irish-tax-ruling-explained/#comment-2867165352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What companies paid more? I looked into this earlier this year, and it was hard to come up with numbers. It seemed at the time like the list was Exxon Mobil, followed by Apple, but perhaps you've got more accurate and up-to-date information?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:51:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Does Apple Announce iPhone Pricing And Availability But Other Phone Makers Don&amp;#8217;t?</title><link>http://www.splatf.com/2012/09/phone-pricing-availability/#comment-649654277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Makes sense to me. How often do companies rush to make announcements before they're ready, just because they want to announce something the week before Apple?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;*cough*google*cough*&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:57:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Killing TV to Punish Comcast? It&amp;#8217;s the Networks That Take the Hit</title><link>http://www.wired.com/business/2012/09/killing-tv-to-punish-comcast-its-the-networks-that-take-the-hit/#comment-639711000</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Comcast doesn't charge that much today. He was extrapolating a hypothetical.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can pay $100 for 150MB down and 65MB up through Verizon FIOS, installation and wireless router free. I think that's about the best deal in the US, though. &lt;a href="http://www22.verizon.com/home/fios-fastest-internet/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www22.verizon.com/home/fios-fastest-internet/"&gt;http://www22.verizon.com/ho...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Verizon also offers a package they describe as $94.99 (but I bet it's 30-50 more than that with taxes and fees), which includes 50/25MB internet, 210+ channels, unlimited phone, and wireless router. That sounds *roughly* equivalent to what you've described. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:16:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 8 Apps the Apple TV Needs to Win the Set-Top-Box War</title><link>http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/08/8-apple-tv-apps/#comment-633175979</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jailbreak + XBMC = playing all the files outside the iTunes umbrella you desire.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:43:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 
			        The Gospel Coalition, sex, and subordination
            </title><link>https://rachelheldevans.com/blog/gospel-coalition-douglas-wilson-sex#comment-591198993</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jared, buddy, there's a post with your name on it that approvingly quotes Doug Wilson saying, "Men dream of being rapists, and women find themselves wistfully reading novels in which someone ravishes the “soon to be made willing” heroine." as well as "A man penetrates, conquers, colonizes, plants. A woman receives, surrenders, accepts."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Adding *more* words probably isn't your best bet at this point. What might bring more clarity is simple: Do you or do you not agree that in sex men are inherently conquering and colonizing while women are inherently surrendering? Do you or do you not agree that men dream of being rapists?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If not, and I hope not, maybe posting Doug Wilson's statements affirming those things was unwise, and a very simple retraction might be helpful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:15:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TOM THE DANCING BUG:  God-Man, in "Copyright or&amp;nbsp;CopyWRONG!"</title><link>http://boingboing.net/2012/02/01/tom-the-dancing-bug-god-man-2.html#comment-427497249</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's the point, Jemmy. Disney is the best example to use because of their hypocrisy, and even Disney themselves had to figure Lady and the Tramp would be in the public domain by now based on IP law at the time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's the whole point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:35:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPad 3 Rumor Roundup: New Display Tech, Lots of Contradictions</title><link>http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2011/12/ipad-3-rumor-roundup/#comment-397540906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What sounds reasonable: everything that was not sourced from Digitimes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What sounds faintly to moderately ridiculous: everything from Digitimes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:07:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 4 Eyes | Product Reviews | Wired.com</title><link>http://www.wired.com/reviews/2011/12/reviews_iphonelense_roundup/#comment-396624215</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you thinking people are going to buy more than one of these? I'm sure there are some people who will carry a second camera, but you might have the math wrong.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have an iPhone 4S. It's a better camera than both of the point-and-shoots I already own, and has the added benefit of instantly transferring pictures I shoot to my home rig via iCloud. (It really is an amazing camera for its size.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So for me, and for any other iPhone 4S owner, spending $35 or $70 for one of the lenses above gets me far better results than buying another point-and-shoot, in cost, in bulk, and in results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Come to think of it, even a $250 adapter to mount my real SLR lenses starts to make sense when I consider that my phone will shoot HD video, while my DSLR won't.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:29:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 4 Eyes | Product Reviews | Wired.com</title><link>http://www.wired.com/reviews/2011/12/reviews_iphonelense_roundup/#comment-396585938</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sure -- several of these lenses are small enough and cheap enough that I could throw one into my backpack and have it pretty handy wherever I go. My DSLR inhabits a pretty large camera bag with its lenses, and is often mounted on a tripod at home while I'm out and about.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:02:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 4 Eyes | Product Reviews | Wired.com</title><link>http://www.wired.com/reviews/2011/12/reviews_iphonelense_roundup/#comment-395820512</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a proper DSLR with proper lenses. I don't tend to have it with me everywhere I go, though. These lenses are much more likely to be on my person when unexpected events crop up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course they won't be *quite* the same quality as the DSLR. But they'll get closer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nobody is suggesting pursuing professional portraiture using one of these lenses, lads.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:13:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Apple will not port Siri to older iOS products</title><link>http://appleheadlines.com/2011/11/10/why-apple-will-not-port-siri-to-older-ios-products/#comment-360478594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Harvey, the proximity sensor in the 4S is different from all previous devices. Jailbroken devices running Siri do not auto-activate as the 4S does. That might be reason enough for Apple to insist on not enabling it for those devices; the inconsistency breaks the experience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm sure Siri will eventually be on all devices, but that doesn't mean it will ever become available for devices older than the 4S. It might, or they might just wait a few years until the iPhone 4 drops off the supported list.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:45:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Apple could fix Final Cut Pro X, in 187 words</title><link>http://www.technovia.co.uk/2011/06/how-apple-could-fix-final-cut-pro-x-in-187-words.html#comment-236945166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Until there's a solution from Apple, there's Amazon.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B002J1UJ4A" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B002J1UJ4A"&gt;http://www.amazon.com/exec/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:56:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech Shopping Rules of Thumb</title><link>https://kk.org/thetechnium/tech-shopping-r/#comment-204041059</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"We" benefit when I choose based on mileage, but "I" benefit when I choose based on reliability. Game theory suggests that I should choose based on reliability, and count on the rest of you choosing based on mileage.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 11:01:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Has The Age Of Totemic Gadgets Passed?</title><link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2011/04/02/has-the-age-of-totemic-gadgets-passed/#comment-177130177</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We're a nation of germaphobes, so I expect bottles of hand-sanitizer to remain a staple. Our eyes aren't getting any better, either, so glasses abound. Sunglasses are common. Moleskines have never been about practicality--there are cheaper bits of paper--but about inspiration.&lt;br&gt;Knives will remain popular, because those Amazon boxes don't open well at the edge of my phone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I admit I don't understand why people still wear watches, but I suppose it's a fashion statement of some sort.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I still carry a pen, and find myself writing on paper quite frequently, even in the presence of a laptop, iPad, and iPhone. I'm not sure why, but I expect that to continue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 21:29:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Has The Age Of Totemic Gadgets Passed?</title><link>http://www.crunchgear.com/2011/04/02/has-the-age-of-totemic-gadgets-passed/#comment-214862915</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We're a nation of germaphobes, so I expect bottles of hand-sanitizer to remain a staple. Our eyes aren't getting any better, either, so glasses abound. Sunglasses are common. Moleskines have never been about practicality--there are cheaper bits of paper--but about inspiration.&lt;br&gt;Knives will remain popular, because those Amazon boxes don't open well at the edge of my phone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I admit I don't understand why people still wear watches, but I suppose it's a fashion statement of some sort.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I still carry a pen, and find myself writing on paper quite frequently, even in the presence of a laptop, iPad, and iPhone. I'm not sure why, but I expect that to continue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 21:29:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Funny Coincidence between Bing’s Rise And Conduit’s Declining Traffic</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/10/the-funny-coincidence-between-bings-rise-and-conduits-declining-traffic/#comment-144490407</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I use Bing. On purpose. I'm a software guy, writing backend code to support games after a stint doing front-end web development.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi, nice to meet you. And now you know one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.S. I'm Mac-only, using Bing within Safari, Firefox, and Chrome.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:08:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Namco Joins in the Valentine's Day Sale Bonanza, New 'Pac-Man' Theme and 'Ms. Pac-Man for iPad' Now Available</title><link>http://toucharcade.com/2011/02/10/namco-valentines-day-sale/#comment-144098675</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you kidding with this Valentine's Day stuff? It's all about Verizon iPhone, nothing else! This is a great chance to climb the charts as an influx of millions of users starts buying their first apps.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:42:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Michelle Obama Doesn&amp;#8217;t Want Her Kids to Use Facebook</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/02/09/michelle-obama-kids-facebook/#comment-143535269</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My daughter turned 13 this week. She's still not allowed on Facebook.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;COPPA says 13, I say older. I'll re-evaluate each birthday.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:22:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Tamper Resistant&amp;#8221; iPhone Easily Opened With $10 Tool</title><link>http://mashable.com/2011/01/21/pentalobe-screwdriver/#comment-132652277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you broke your headlights trying to replace them, the dealer would obviously charge you to fix your breakage. Apple does extraordinary warranty work, and I suspect these screws are a misguided attempt to avoid replacing phones people claim they've never tried to open.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If Apple charged by the hour for all work, I'm guessing they'd use ordinary off-the-shelf screws as well!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pwinn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:39:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>