<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for pstehlik</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-9b45911e" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/pstehlik/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:23:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How to run single Groovy based unit tests in Netbeans 6.7</title><link>http://software-is-insane.blogspot.com/2009/03/junit-test-single-groovy-netbeans.html#comment-8503940</link><description>Hey Alvin,&lt;br&gt;Are you using the M3 of NetBeans 6.7? I don't know if the described workaround is good for NB 6.5!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In order to run a single .groovy file from NetBeans you have to right-click the filename in the file-tree and select 'Run File' (Shift+F6)&lt;br&gt;If the file that you are executing is within the 'Test Packages' etc it will then execute the 'test-single' traget and with this run the unit test on this single file.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You have to change the build.xml as I described before you can do that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pstehlik</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:23:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to run Groovy unit tests in Netbeans</title><link>http://software-is-insane.blogspot.com/2009/03/how-unit-test-groovy-netbeans.html#comment-7588866</link><description>thanks for the hint!&lt;br&gt;will try that one out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pstehlik</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:25:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to run Groovy unit tests in Netbeans</title><link>http://software-is-insane.blogspot.com/2009/03/how-unit-test-groovy-netbeans.html#comment-7320942</link><description>Why do you think that you don't need to override -post-test-run?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you are talking about how to include code highlighting in your blog/website, check out &lt;a href="http://alexgorbatchev.com/wiki/SyntaxHighlighter" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://alexgorbatchev.com/wiki/SyntaxHighlighter&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pstehlik</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:13:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The speed difference between the different types of Strings in Groovy and Grails</title><link>http://thinkoutsidethebubble.net/2009/01/speed-difference-between-different.html#comment-5113945</link><description>The question was not the difference between the Strings in general but more the question if there is a significant speed difference when using the one or the other  (or slahshy Strings etc) over the course of a complete project.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was clear from the beginning that the double quoted Strings are more complex as they allow closures etc inside them.  However, they are only rendered into GStrings if they actually contain anything like that.  If they only contain text, they are normal Strings.  There was a really nice thread on the mailing list in regards to that with some good explanations from Jochen Theodorou -&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://www.nabble.com/Speed-of-different-String-types-in-Groovy-Grails-tt21247790.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.nabble.com/Speed-of-different-String...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pstehlik</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:15:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The speed difference between the different types of Strings in Groovy and Grails</title><link>http://thinkoutsidethebubble.net/2009/01/speed-difference-between-different.html#comment-4823887</link><description>what times would you suggest make sense?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pstehlik</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 23:13:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boxee on AppleTV 2.3</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/11/boxee-on-applet.html#comment-3999578</link><description>would be great to have one of these invite codes for the time around thanksgiving - where one could probably find some hours to do hobby-tech instead of pure hobby-work-tech</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pstehlik</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:45:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2D Barcodes</title><link>http://jonebird.com/2008/11/06/2d-barcodes/#comment-3571514</link><description>Hi there,&lt;br&gt;When you are talking about different interesting ways of using QR Codes, you should check out &lt;a href="http://www.Snappr.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.Snappr.net&lt;/a&gt; where you can create all different kinds of mobile content; linked with a QR Code. You can also print the Codes right from there on shirts, mugs etc and can also manage your content. That means you can for example let your personal Code point to your vCard one day, but the other day, a scanning person will get to your blog.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hope you like it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pstehlik</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:12:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Systems, Open Data, Transparency</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/09/open-systems-op.html#comment-2107551</link><description>"For those that don't know Angelsoft is a free web service [...]"&lt;br&gt;As far as I can see it is only free for the Investor-Side. If you are registering as an entrepreneur "Angelsoft charges a non-refundable $250 application fee for posting to the Investor Community."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt; Philip</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pstehlik</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:45:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>