<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for psmith</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/psmith/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/psmith/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:55:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Mag ABCs: Men&amp;#039;s Health stays top as men&amp;#039;s sector dives</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/48767#comment-477459144</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The message sent to psmith@pressgazette.co.uk  on Mon Mar 26 13:47:29 2012 may contain malicious content. &lt;br&gt;Sender:&lt;br&gt;Subject: [pressgazette] Re: Mag ABCs: Men's Health stays top as men's sector dives -Press Gazette Policy name: Inbound Default&lt;br&gt;Filter name: Anti-Spam&lt;br&gt;Action on the message: drop&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">psmith</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:55:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Emap Inform chief exec Simon Middelboe gets the axe</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/44246#comment-15963209</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Delete"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">psmith</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 06:59:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Judge rules: Charity Commission report covered by qualified privilege - Press Gazette</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=40988#comment-15703881</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Delete"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">psmith</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:18:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A day at the FT: blogging, business models and journalism</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/wire/3838#comment-2638788</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point Jon,&lt;br&gt;That was probably not the best example - but maybe things like that do put off some from engaging in social media or blogging in any sense and I wouldn't be surprised if some execs actively discourage their staff from getting involved. &lt;br&gt;I'm sure there are more serious business people prepared to have their say on a named basis for honest reasons, if they have the time.  Although as we discussed yesterday there still many CEOs who have their secretary do their email for them...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">psmith</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:35:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Death of print? News International unveils &amp;#039;biggest printing plant in the world&amp;#039;</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/40595#comment-764120</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Printrobot, The Sun is a daily newspaper so won't really be affected by deadline changes from the Broxbourne move. It means weeklies, News of the World and the Sunday Times, can put their many different sections to bed much later - some changing from Wednesday to Saturday.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">psmith</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:50:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Princess Beatrice to join FT on work experience</title><link>http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/wire/3273#comment-615596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jemima - It's actually a pic from 2006, but thanks anyway!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">psmith</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 19:25:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>