<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for prattm</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/prattm/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/prattm/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:09:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Pipedrive’s Scheduling Tool Takes the Hassle out of Booking Meetings</title><link>https://www.pipedrive.com/en/blog/scheduling-tool#comment-3528559498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am a paying Pipedrive customer and love it (disclaimer given what I am about to say!): I don't get this. I currently use and love &lt;a href="http://vyte.in" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="vyte.in"&gt;vyte.in&lt;/a&gt; for mtg scheduling (it's a lot like Calendly) So why do I need to create recurring events? Can I just select times I am open barring anything else on my schedule and let them choose? The notion of creating an event BEFORE an event is scheduled seems backwards. The event creation should be when the contact chooses a time slot. Am I missing something?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:09:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Web Forms Update: Fast Response, Better Looking</title><link>https://www.pipedrive.com/en/blog/web-forms-updates#comment-3361268982</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I get custom fields in my web forms. What are you referring to?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:13:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3250868350</link><description>&lt;p&gt;re "we all know" fair point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:36:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3250860126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;technically, both are correct depending on context: simply calling someone an idiot is an insult. if you are doing it instead of attacking their argument (presuming you are engaged in one) then it is ad hominem. No? (see Max's comment above) I suppose max was debating whether "idiot" was used ad hominem or just good old fun insulting. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:31:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3250855560</link><description>&lt;p&gt;never really was a good speller. thanks for the catch&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:29:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marketing Reporting 101, Part 6: Wrapping Up</title><link>http://www.christopherspenn.com/2017/04/marketing-reporting-101-part-6-wrapping-up/#comment-3249514558</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This series has been a boon to our business. The very concept of reporting in marketing is so misunderstood so if, like us, you sell a reporting automation product and customers (agencies) are still using words like "dashboard" then series like this go a long way to educate them. Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:32:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3247691135</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Max, I'm sorry if I offended you. I do not think I am smarter than you or anyone on this thread. I don't think my argument trumps yours. I was only trying (poorly, I suppose) to show you the reasons for my own belief. I loathe the no true Scotsman argument as much as you. I hope you forgive me. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:55:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246876990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;there are plenty of things I will never understand. That doesn't make me question my faculties in a "gaslighting" sense. gotta run. take care and thanks for such a good discussion. - Mike&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 17:36:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246874788</link><description>&lt;p&gt;actually the opposite. the original claims led to the church not the other way around. I gotta take off. I appreciate the chance to discuss civilly. Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 17:34:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246870691</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ok. uncle. gaslighting is about making people question their sanity. Do you really think that's what I am doing. Just wanted to discuss sides of an issue. Take care.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 17:30:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246868536</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess we should close this thread out because that was not my intention. Idid not come here to troll. nor insult. nor convert. Nor have I called anyone "wrong" (by your definition it seems that if if I present another side to something I am calling them wrong and being a trolling asshole masking it in polite language (doesn't that apply to all debates on threads then? There's a lot I don't know other than the notion that hostility here is probably not necessary.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 17:28:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246858029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mostly agree but you left out the existential stuff that lives in the realm of philosophy. We probably shouldn't go there esp when it gets into the "why" which science can't touch&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 17:19:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246854017</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll do my best&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 17:15:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246851191</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn't think I was dodging anything.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 17:13:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246849223</link><description>&lt;p&gt;no kidding. I am lost at this point. By Neil I meant the writer  of the blog post. I am not trying to convert anyone to anything. Just enjoying, hopefully, a high level discussion with some smart folks like yourself.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 17:11:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246845432</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not at all, Clint. I am not preaching anything. Honest. We're just having a discussion. Making points on both side. Treating each other with respect. No one is trying to convert anyone to anything. I think some of the points I made we decent and others were pretty poorly worded as to be darn ineffectual. I would suggest that most of the people here would agree I have treated everyone here with respect. For reasons I can't figure out, you think otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 17:08:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246841731</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're a more literal reader of the Bible than I am :-) Seriously, you want to take every word at face value. You're not even reading it in the original language yet you are of with accepting the language carte blanch. That's not even intellectually honest. Move mountains is clearly a metaphor. Genesis 1 is clearly a Hebrew poem written in poetic style (yes, that renders all the young earthers wrong as wrong can be) Anyway "Ask and it will be given to you" requires knowing what "it" is and even if what you are given is an answer that you even understand. But, hey, if you deny the existence of God (that's cool) then why on earth even bother with this book in the first place?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 17:05:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246836251</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you're kind. Most folks on this thread think I am either delusional, an idiot or a kool-aid drinker. It's either or for them. I am either a rational, secularist who uses his brain or a gullible religious type&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 17:00:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246833569</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry to waste your time&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 16:58:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246826961</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Didn't say that. It absolutely can be inconsistent. I just don't think it is. Neil came out and said it absolutely was not even allowing that it might not be.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 16:52:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246825468</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sorry. I did not mean to offend you. You mentioned seeking truth. I am merely doing the same. I am not trying to argue you into anything.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 16:51:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246807964</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How do you know what's true?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 16:39:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246806629</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are tons of places (like most of Paul's letters) that back up that position. Also - everyone wants to make huge parts of the Bible into some sort of history book or a science book. It's not really either. I happen to think, as do most scholars, that it explains human behavior better than most things. I don't have to bend it to match reality at all (and I am not some racist, woman hating  right wing jerk either. Bu I understand your frustration. I do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 16:38:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246800438</link><description>&lt;p&gt;C'mon, Miles, it was a typo. I hope you allow me that. "i" and "u" are right next to each other.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 16:33:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shame on You for Thinking Prayer Does Anything</title><link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2017/04/07/shame-thinking-prayer-anything/#comment-3246798841</link><description>&lt;p&gt;that's a lot and I am getting sucked into this thread in a million places. The Patheos reviews are begging the question and are biased in their position. Lemme see if I can find a few things.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael J. Pratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2017 16:32:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>