<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for playerx</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-3eb4515a" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/playerx/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:19:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: archive.org's S3-alike service? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/11/08/archiveorgsS3alikeService.html#comment-22417547</link><description>This is awesome. Thanks for the pointer Dave.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:19:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Testing BuddyPress (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/10/24/testingBuddypress.html#comment-20959233</link><description>Hi Dave,&lt;br&gt;I have the p2 theme (slightly more simple theme like twitter.) installed on my wp-mu + buddy press test site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://2ff.us/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://2ff.us/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feel free to make an account/blog. I just now setup the DNS wildcard for sub-domain blogs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:35:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter's lists (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/10/15/twittersLists.html#comment-20178976</link><description>I think everyone who doesn't like pure chaos will eventually index and categorize their following/followers into lists.&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;3 Reading Lists;&lt;br&gt;I still can't believe that someone or thing actually got a reading list patent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those who are on the SUL, with lists, will still have the inorganic popularity driven flow of garbage. Their lists will get more eyes and list follows.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:44:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DNS for RSS feeds (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/09/20/dnsForRssFeeds.html#comment-17001519</link><description>To some extent, I can't blame them.&lt;br&gt;Everyone is just trying to make nice things out of prior art. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But you said it right there. "they've got a nice web app for editing my DNS profile";&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So to some degree they just lowered another barrier for people who do not/cannot/will not run their own Internet enabled vCard and they also just happened to have the right amount of money for ICANN to bless them with control over a TLD.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:12:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DNS for RSS feeds (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/09/20/dnsForRssFeeds.html#comment-17000516</link><description>The whole .tel TLD in my eyes is just another way for another domain registrar to get you to purchase yet another domain.&lt;br&gt;The information on the .tel is just what you've chosen to share about you which points elsewhere, other domains, or methods of contact, phone, postal mail, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any capable user with a domain, using DNS, and HTTP can do what .tel does today.&lt;br&gt;I'll further add, any new ccTLD or gTLD is not going to add/do anything which cannot already be done today.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:33:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: He has a million followers (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/09/18/heHasAMillionFollowers.html#comment-16905633</link><description>*sigh*</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:18:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ping.fm / Blog / What does it all mean?</title><link>http://ping.fm/blog/what-does-it-all-mean/#comment-16219037</link><description>Time to invest in a third mysql replication partner?&lt;br&gt;Master -&amp;gt; Slave -&amp;gt; Slave?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyways... Sad to hear to hear about the data and URL loss. Thankfully I haven't been posting through pingfm constantly, as of lately thanks to a lack of supporting MacOSX twitter clients.  How much of the short URL address space did you have to invalidate?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks guys for keeping us updated so thoroughly!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:57:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Someone give Om an award (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/09/08/someoneGiveOmAnAward.html#comment-16215380</link><description>It's good to see FeedBurner isn't stripping out elements from the Feed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:14:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nambu to be Re-Released (so to speak)</title><link>http://blog.nambu.com/post/171768576#comment-15395959</link><description>Well then Snow Leopard is going to break my Nambu this Friday when I upgrade.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is kind of poor and another reason to open source the client.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Way to keep your OSX client #1 with the users!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyone know of another good Free native client without ads?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:46:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New API Methods</title><link>http://blog.tr.im/post/171738968#comment-15394197</link><description>This is good. Plus with the move to open source tr.im it's only going to strengthen your position.  Keep it up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:56:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Courage and cowardice (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/08/23/courageAndCowardice.html#comment-15331655</link><description>w00t! for the Jon Stewart Quote. It may have been gold though. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:52:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to fix URL-shorteners (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/08/19/howToFixUrlshorteners.html#comment-15104652</link><description>"Ideally, you'd want all URL shorteners to use the same name space to prevent a token collision."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Using all the same token name space, while everyone has their own FQDN would severely handicap the ability for any one URL shortener to act alone in provisioning tokens without a clearing house. I sure as hell don't want to see an ICANN of shortURL.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's too late for collision prevention, no one does it, and it's too time constraining. Also, to manually choose new tokens and then update all the accessible HTML elements for links already distributed sounds like a nightmare.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All the manual DNS changes can be a hassle should your provider not allow you to adjust SOA or individual TTL refresh, expiry entries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's a tip, if we point our CNAME to your partner.adjix.com; you should be the one to update DNS records when you fail, not us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:06:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to fix URL-shorteners (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/08/19/howToFixUrlshorteners.html#comment-15096949</link><description>How would I be able to move my current "http://sho.rtu.rl/ty35" link to your service?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From what I've seen playing around with your solution, you would need everyone to work around the same name space, base32,64, 1-12? characters, otherwise there would be overlap when moving your short link files between services when they "close up shop" and you will have to create more sub-domains each time. {a,b,c,d}.ho.st</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:37:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to fix URL-shorteners (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/08/19/howToFixUrlshorteners.html#comment-15080491</link><description>Here's more about the canonical link element.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=139394" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/an...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the YouTube video around 12:20 the presenter begins talking about how the site reputation does not transfer between domains.&lt;br&gt;So having canonical tags pointing to domains anywhere other than the current domain or sub-domain causes Google to ignore it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ex. of good use of canonical element and bad.&lt;br&gt;a.blah.com/1137 -&amp;gt; blog.blah.com/2009/08/19/some-post-about-stuff&lt;br&gt;ad.vu/1137 -&amp;gt;  blog.blah.com/2009/08/19/some-post-about-stuff</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:12:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: tr.im to be Community-Owned</title><link>http://blog.tr.im/post/165049236#comment-14975403</link><description>BTW, I bet if you release @nambucom under MIT like you plan to do with tr.im you'd further cement your relationship with the community, and have software platinum in hand, which would devour any remaining Mac OSX twitter clients.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:56:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: tr.im to be Community-Owned</title><link>http://blog.tr.im/post/165049236#comment-14975220</link><description>+2 points for some redemption.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks Eric :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:52:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The right and wrong way to do tech (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/08/15/theRightAndWrongWayToDoTec.html#comment-14872213</link><description>Unless the S3 is doing 301-307 then the link juice is lost from what I understand.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:44:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: tr.im Resurrected</title><link>http://blog.tr.im/post/160697842#comment-14752116</link><description>Yea, that magic number of character length is annoying as hell to me. ping.fm does it too occasionally.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There really just needs to be on/off switches for the application of URL shortening in these networks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyways while still a shorter example of the title and URL, the tr.im'd URL length example is understandably a bit extreme.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:49:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: tr.im R.I.P.</title><link>http://blog.tr.im/post/159369789#comment-14749633</link><description>With that statement, I believe you just obviated the need entirely for short URL services, automated and hand made backups.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In all honesty, yes those links were throw-away links in the greater sense, because I did create them on domains which I have no control over. I will ultimately have to deal with that should I become unable to rewrite what is in my Database. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I saved all those full size links in a database system not of my own control, without any sort of backup tools, in either tinyurl, tr.im, bit.ly, and my only index key is the short URL in backup. So at this point, &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;tinyurl.com&lt;/a&gt; has been around longer than Twitter, bit.ly and tr.im put together.  I also suppose you expect me to have those URL somewhere that I shortened from 2001 as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course all Internet services are going to fail at some point. But you also need to ask yourself which services have tools to easily export all the entries. Even with twitter you can only go back 3200 posts. Unfortunately I did not get a decent backup system for twitter in place until after reaching over that system limitation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have enough of the short URL created and backed-up to be happy, and again should someone write a WordPress plugin or mysql database script which expands them all, life would be great.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So in the mean time a decent opportunity for someone to come in and own this uncaring, difficult to make a buck niche of the Internet as it is ripe for the taking for those who want the glory.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:33:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: tr.im Resurrected</title><link>http://blog.tr.im/post/160697842#comment-14662772</link><description>Just to address #1.&lt;br&gt;Here is a tweet, where I trim'd a URL, and it's even longer than the current ID.&lt;br&gt;Hope you like the name.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://tr.im/resurrected" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tr.im/resurrected&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Twitter didn't dork my trim'd URL to bit.ly&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/px/status/3253349978" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/px/status/3253349978&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:25:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: tr.im to December 31, 2009</title><link>http://blog.tr.im/post/159489555#comment-14580642</link><description>Sorry I'll clarify this for you. &lt;br&gt;Name one IRC network which actually makes a dollar +of revenue+ that isn't non-profit.&lt;br&gt;Non Profits can make money. They just have to apply it to the business.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What if Goodwill suddenly realized they had millions of dollars worth of stuff to get rid of that people wanted to donate money for in trade? Oh yea, they already do this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:38:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: tr.im R.I.P.</title><link>http://blog.tr.im/post/159369789#comment-14567245</link><description>It all lacks trust. Provide the ability to export the data, or next time we won't trust the business venture from these people, and they will fail.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:21:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: tr.im announces shutdown (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/08/09/trimAnnouncesShutdown.html#comment-14566293</link><description>Also "no chance to succeed as success would be defined in this area" &lt;br&gt;Who really defined success in this area? Who here as actually succeeded? What is the defining point of success? I would have to say no one has this answer. If they say they do, it's all about the level of usury their accountant is capable of. There isn't anything here which wasn't here before. People communicated using their computer or in short messages using IRC or Instant Messenger clients long before.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:08:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: tr.im announces shutdown (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/08/09/trimAnnouncesShutdown.html#comment-14565482</link><description>&lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;tinyurl.com&lt;/a&gt; survives quite well.&lt;br&gt;been here before twitter.&lt;br&gt;my guess will be here after twitter.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:02:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: tr.im to December 31, 2009</title><link>http://blog.tr.im/post/159489555#comment-14561219</link><description>I don't see any opensource Twitter or URC client developers bitching.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Stop trying to think you can possibly earn any money on fruitless ventures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Name one IRC network which actually makes a dollar that isn't non-profit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">playerx</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:42:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>