<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for parislemon</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/parislemon/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:22:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Did AT&amp;#038;T have Apple kill NetShare to start its own tethering plan?</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/29/did-att-have-apple-kill-netshare-to-start-its-own-tethering-plan/#comment-1915696</link><description>ha ha ha, that is a GREAT point Henry. maybe Jobs had to turn it off because of his excessive use of slang.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:22:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Android Developer Challenge I winners &amp;#8212; nary a big name in sight</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/28/android-developer-challenge-i-winners-nary-a-big-name-in-sight/#comment-1915161</link><description>A good example of how the more open ecosystem of Android could drive innovation. Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:52:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Android Developer Challenge I winners &amp;#8212; nary a big name in sight</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/28/android-developer-challenge-i-winners-nary-a-big-name-in-sight/#comment-1915147</link><description>Ah, what a good name! Thanks for the clarification Rylan.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:51:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft fails to buy Yahoo, so it buys&amp;#8230;some European comparison shopping sites?</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/29/microsoft-fails-to-buy-yahoo-so-it-buyssome-european-comparison-shopping-sites/#comment-1915037</link><description>Right, sorry about that, meant to note that it walked away from it just last week. I'll correct. Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:45:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Sky is Falling: Comcastic Caps</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2730/the-sky-is-falling-comcastic-caps/#comment-1910506</link><description>Even if (when) Google comes up with such a solution, it will not be free unless they choose to subsidize the service. And experience tells us that subsidized services like that, sooner or later, come with a price - would you use "free" bandwidth from Google if they put interstitials between every few web pages you viewed, for example? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The root of this is really simple economics: someone downloading 100GB of data per month costs Comcast a lot more than someone using 10GB. At some point along the line of how much you download, Comcast stops making a profit on a per-user basis, and starts making a loss. At that point, unless you cut your usage, they're really better off if you're NOT a customer. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Comcast hasn't set that 250GB cap in a vacuum: that's probably close to the point at which it starts to lose money on a per-customer basis (and in fact, that point may even be lower - it may have decided it can afford to subsidize customers who use, say, 100GB-250GB in the short term simply to have a higher cap).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.inquisitr.com/2730/the-sky-is-falling-comcastic-caps/</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:46:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Android Developer Challenge I winners &amp;#8212; nary a big name in sight</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/28/android-developer-challenge-i-winners-nary-a-big-name-in-sight/#comment-1909900</link><description>Big in Japan is just the name of the company.  We're actually based in Dallas.  Check us out at &lt;a href="http://www.biggu.com"&gt;http://www.biggu.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rylan Barnes</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:43:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Android Developer Challenge I winners &amp;#8212; nary a big name in sight</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/28/android-developer-challenge-i-winners-nary-a-big-name-in-sight/#comment-1908069</link><description>big in Japan right? but I don't think most people stateside have heard of it. good to keep the global perspective in mind though, thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:56:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast to dam and damn the Internet with usage caps</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/28/comcast-to-dam-and-damn-the-internet-with-usage-caps/#comment-1906809</link><description>Of course they have a right … but that's not what I'm arguing. I hate capping. Read my comment again: the success they've seen in asking customers to voluntarily dial back bandwidth consumption is, I believe, because the _customers_ (not the users, mind you) are astonished at the bandwidth that's being consumed under their noses.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Silus Grok</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:21:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple&amp;#8217;s major multi-touch plans continue to come into focus</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/28/apples-major-multi-touch-plans-continue-to-come-into-focus/#comment-1906381</link><description>An interesting idea Fabio. As for price, it may still be cost prohibitive for this year, but I expect we'll see a device by next year.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:34:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast to dam and damn the Internet with usage caps</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/28/comcast-to-dam-and-damn-the-internet-with-usage-caps/#comment-1906356</link><description>Yeah, I wouldn't expect customer service reps to know something like that just yet. But if this becomes standard you could well be calling in to check your remaining usage balance just as you do for your phone.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:33:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Sky is Falling: Comcastic Caps</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2730/the-sky-is-falling-comcastic-caps/#comment-1906337</link><description>True that bandwidth does cost money Duncan, but Comcast also charges us quite a bit of money. The problem here is that this sets a dangerous precedent towards limiting the Internet. Others are sure to follow. It might be wrong to think that technology for serving data cost effectively can keep up with demand, but Comcast and others already limit speeds of downloads. That's why I hope someone (Google or anyone else) is able to come up with a wireless solution via the white space (in the U.S.) or something else. It'll happen eventually, we won't always been using coaxial cable for data transfers, but how long?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:31:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast to dam and damn the Internet with usage caps</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/28/comcast-to-dam-and-damn-the-internet-with-usage-caps/#comment-1906260</link><description>Start one up if there isn't Don. I'll join.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:23:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast to dam and damn the Internet with usage caps</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/28/comcast-to-dam-and-damn-the-internet-with-usage-caps/#comment-1906254</link><description>You may be right on illegal music, but remember that legal online music and movies are continuing to become more and more popular, this will harm them. Also porn could be right too, but porn isn't illegal, so does Comcast really have a right to try and curb that?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:23:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed working on a new RSS supplement to speed up data retrieval</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/27/friendfeed-working-on-a-new-rss-supplement-to-speed-up-data-retrieval/#comment-1877794</link><description>Thanks MK. Great stuff, obviously.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Think Twitter strategy right now is to make XMPP more available through Gnip.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/18/gnip-to-be-the-nozzle-to-twitters-xmpp-firehose/"&gt;http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/18/gnip-to-be-th...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:57:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google is neither buying or running many online display ads, but Microsoft and MySpace are</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/26/google-is-neither-buying-or-running-many-online-display-ads-but-myspace-and-microsoft-are/#comment-1859794</link><description>gotcha</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/26/google-is-neither-buying-or-running-many-online-display-ads-but-myspace-and-microsoft-are/</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:17:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google is neither buying or running many online display ads, but Microsoft and MySpace are</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/26/google-is-neither-buying-or-running-many-online-display-ads-but-myspace-and-microsoft-are/#comment-1859595</link><description>Yeah, definitely looks intriguing Don. More options are always better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:04:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google is neither buying or running many online display ads, but Microsoft and MySpace are</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/26/google-is-neither-buying-or-running-many-online-display-ads-but-myspace-and-microsoft-are/#comment-1859587</link><description>Main point wasn't that Google isn't running them, more that they aren't showing them in large numbers on their sites - I just didn't want the title to be 4 lines long.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:03:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Want to bypass iPhone SMS fees for Twitter updates? Get JustUpdate</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/26/want-to-bypass-iphone-sms-fees-for-twitter-updates-get-justupdate/#comment-1859503</link><description>Well then obviously this is less pertinent to you. But many people (myself included) don't have that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:55:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter blacklists Mad Men characters (some of them)</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/25/twitter-blacklists-mad-men-characters-some-of-them/#comment-1858991</link><description>Victory!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:00:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter blacklists Mad Men characters (some of them)</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/25/twitter-blacklists-mad-men-characters-some-of-them/#comment-1858915</link><description>Hello again, @don_draper! Goodbye, @fakedondraper! All is well again &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/omgmadmentwitterisback"&gt;http://bit.ly/omgmadmentwitterisback&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/25/twitter-blacklists-mad-men-characters-some-of-them/</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:50:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter blacklists Mad Men characters (some of them)</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/25/twitter-blacklists-mad-men-characters-some-of-them/#comment-1856321</link><description>That's a good point Jeff, but as you note it's a pretty gray line. If AMC wants the names for themselves to use that may be one thing, but there's not indication that will happen.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:18:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter blacklists Mad Men characters (some of them)</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/25/twitter-blacklists-mad-men-characters-some-of-them/#comment-1856299</link><description>Yeah, it seems rather silly for AMC to be silencing free promotion.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:17:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter blacklists Mad Men characters (some of them)</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/25/twitter-blacklists-mad-men-characters-some-of-them/#comment-1856284</link><description>Ha ha, thanks Peter.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:16:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter blacklists Mad Men characters (some of them)</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/25/twitter-blacklists-mad-men-characters-some-of-them/#comment-1856280</link><description>yeah, i've gotten a TON of new ones today alone :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:15:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Gears quietly launches beta test for Safari</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/26/google-gears-quietly-launches-beta-test-for-safari/#comment-1856271</link><description>Ooops. Thanks jemima, left out a word. Fixed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">parislemon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:15:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>