<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for norton73</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/norton73/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:13:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: State faces up to $1 billion shortfall in January</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/state_faces_up_to_1_billion_shortfall_in_january/#comment-20892516</link><description>...particularly since the state’s budget was about $4 billion in 2003 and has grown by 50% over the last seven years, while the state’s population only increased by 6%.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AlbertoG</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:13:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: State faces up to $1 billion shortfall in January</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/state_faces_up_to_1_billion_shortfall_in_january/#comment-20818187</link><description>We're putting a band aid on a patient that requires major surgery.  Take two aspirin and call me in January.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">norton73</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:06:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: State faces up to $1 billion shortfall in January</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/state_faces_up_to_1_billion_shortfall_in_january/#comment-20817835</link><description>What's your point?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">johnnyrayne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:56:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: State faces up to $1 billion shortfall in January</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/state_faces_up_to_1_billion_shortfall_in_january/#comment-20816222</link><description>fuck off</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Samsell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:12:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: State faces up to $1 billion shortfall in January</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/state_faces_up_to_1_billion_shortfall_in_january/#comment-20814786</link><description>Kicking the can down the road.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">norton73</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:35:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Senator accuses colleagues of abusing per diem</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/senator_accuses_colleagues_of_abusing_per_diem/#comment-20753357</link><description>I assume that when you say they should get a salary, they still get the per diem.  That's the norm in most enterprises, government and private.  Otherwise, what's the point?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">norton73</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:55:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Denish challenges school districts to cut energy costs</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/denish_challenges_school_districts_to_cut_energy_costs/#comment-20753199</link><description>Ten percent of $60 million = $6 million.  Budget deficit approaching $1 billion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Somehow, the phrase "rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic" comes to mind.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">norton73</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:52:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s Complicated with Richard &amp;#8216;R.J.&amp;#8217; Berry</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/it8217s_complicated_with_richard_8216rj8217_berry/#comment-19594549</link><description>I think some of the pundocracy is giving too much credit to public financing for the outcome of the election.  True, publicly financed candidates had to abide by spending caps.  But before a privately funded candidate could spend $1 million or more, they would have to raise that amount.  This was the first election with the new Election Code provisions banning "business" contributions.  Combined with the current state of the economy, I have to believe that consideration is what drove all three mayoral candidates to public financing in the first place.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">norton73</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:22:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rael wants to expand lieutenant governor’s role</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/rael_wants_to_expand_lieutenant_governors_role/#comment-18570758</link><description>If New Mexico were a U S city, it would only be the 5th most populous (behind New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Houston).  I think a more accurate statement would be that THIS governor has little time to be involved in day-to-day management.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">norton73</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:21:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Member-to-member mail is an unavoidable loophole in Albuquerque&amp;#8217;s public financing system</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/member_to_member_mail_is_an_unavoidable_loophole_in_albuquerque8217s_public_financing_system/#comment-18314569</link><description>I don't believe the word "individual" appears in the MFC definition.  It uses the word "person" which defined later in the definitions to include individuals and businesses.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">norton73</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:19:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Member-to-member mail is an unavoidable loophole in Albuquerque&amp;#8217;s public financing system</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/member_to_member_mail_is_an_unavoidable_loophole_in_albuquerque8217s_public_financing_system/#comment-18314016</link><description>I asked about political party's and apparently they've been considered differently under federal case law. But the member to member criteria doesn't apply for them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marjorie</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:05:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Member-to-member mail is an unavoidable loophole in Albuquerque&amp;#8217;s public financing system</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/member_to_member_mail_is_an_unavoidable_loophole_in_albuquerque8217s_public_financing_system/#comment-18307868</link><description>So then the Democratic Party of New Mexico would be perfectly within its rights to send anti-Berry mailers to every registered Democrat within the Albuquerque city limits without having to register as an MFC.  According to the party rules, every registered Democrat is a "member".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">norton73</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:28:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: King pushes ethics commission, other reforms</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/king_pushes_ethics_commission_other_reforms/#comment-18291613</link><description>Heath,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I continue to be confused by one issue.  What authority, if any, can a creature of the governor and legislature have over other constitutional offices?  Yes, MannyGate involved the legislature.  But other recent ethics issues have embroiled the Land Office, Treasurer's Office, and Secretary of State.  Recently we saw the State Auditor and AG butting heads.  The AG is already predicting this will be an "advisory" panel.  Translation:  Ethics Commission?  Yeah, we got that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What happens if there is an ethics issue within the AG's office.  Do they turn it over to those genius' at the Santa Fe DA's office who can't even write a proper jury instruction?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't see any true ethics reform short of a commission created in the state constitution.  But it appears that will never happen because it would require government to actually cede some power back to the citizenry.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">norton73</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:18:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Throw enough money at Johnny and surely he’ll read</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/throw_enough_money_at_johnny_and_surely_hell_read/#comment-17951167</link><description>I'm sorry, but when the teacher's union and liberals, who got their hands on the New Mexican taxpayers money, they promised us that all that money would transmit into increased scores.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There were no conditions such as "well don't expect much due to the poverty".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It must be nice being a liberal and not having to be held accountable to their promises.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leonidas56</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:58:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SunCal targets Cadigan in election mailer</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/suncal_targets_cadigan_in_election_mailer/#comment-17941810</link><description>I did look at those reports just yesterday.  I know he has taken developer money in the past, but I question how you make that conclusion for the '09 election cycle.  There are a lot of contributions from lawyers, but I'm not seeing money from the developer crowd in any meaningful amount.  You'll find that money in the MFCs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">norton73</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:40:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SunCal targets Cadigan in election mailer</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/suncal_targets_cadigan_in_election_mailer/#comment-17886494</link><description>Hey, commando73—How would you like to scan that mailer and e-mail it to tips@newmexicoindependent.com? We're asking readers to help us keep up with the flood of campaign mail and we could use your help!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nmindependent</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:08:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SunCal targets Cadigan in election mailer</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/suncal_targets_cadigan_in_election_mailer/#comment-17856313</link><description>A second mailer appeared today in the mailbox.  This one attacks Cadigan as against schools because he doesn't support creation of a SunCal school district.  Source, Westside Chamber of Commerce (i.e. Dan Serrano).  By the way, who is Cabarello Farm?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">norton73</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:17:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Throw enough money at Johnny and surely he’ll read</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/throw_enough_money_at_johnny_and_surely_hell_read/#comment-17784577</link><description>I think that is an excellent observation and very on point.  I have no reason to doubt that poverty is a critical factor in school performance.  My question is, does throwing more money at schools address the poverty issues that hamper school performance today?  Certainly in the long run better educated children are less likely to end up in poverty.  But I don't agree that the schools are the proper place to site poverty programs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">norton73</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:33:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Throw enough money at Johnny and surely he’ll read</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/throw_enough_money_at_johnny_and_surely_hell_read/#comment-17783232</link><description>According to the U.S. Census, New Mexico's child poverty rate is 4th in the nation, with 1 out of every 4 children in the state living in poverty.  Utah is 46th in the nation when it comes to child poverty.  This has a huge impact on education statistics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Likewise, Florida is ranked 26th in overall poverty and 23rd in childhood poverty... NM ranks 4th in both.  There's a range of factors that play into this if your goal is to really probe the issue.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">benito_a</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:05:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Throw enough money at Johnny and surely he’ll read</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/throw_enough_money_at_johnny_and_surely_hell_read/#comment-17759675</link><description>&lt;i&gt;I'm not understanding how this works. Utah's per pupil spending is last or next to last and yet Utah manages a "C" grade for school performance. NM is spending more, but gets an "F. Seems like dollars spent isn't the correct correlation.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Commando,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How dare you ask the $64,000 dollar question!!!!   Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!  Just accept that the only solution to New Mexico's failing grades w/r/t education is to throw even more money, if that was possible, to the problem.&lt;/i&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leonidas56</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:09:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Throw enough money at Johnny and surely he’ll read</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/throw_enough_money_at_johnny_and_surely_hell_read/#comment-17750986</link><description>I'm not understanding how this works.  Utah's per pupil spending is last or next to last and yet Utah manages a "C" grade for school performance.  NM is spending more, but gets an "F.  Seems like dollars spent isn't the correct correlation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">norton73</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:38:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Berry campaign mailer sews distrust among immigrants, advocates say</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/berry_campaign_mailer_sews_distrust_among_immigrants_advocates_say/#comment-17332938</link><description>"It has to only be on the pretext of a criminal investigation.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe APD should take some of that federal grant money and buy John Walsh a dictionary.  Either that or hire a new PIO who actually knows what words mean.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">norton73</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:34:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: N.M. GOP Chairman Harvey Yates: Want less scandal? Vote Republican</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/nm_gop_chairman_harvey_yates_want_less_scandal_vote_republican/#comment-8055439</link><description>I live in the Albuquerque portion of Block's district.  I voted for Rick Lass and would have considered voting for a Republican IF THERE HAD BEEN ONE ON THE BALLOT.  You can't get elected if you don't run.  Apparently this is a concept that has escaped Mr. Yates.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">norton73</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:35:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thousands of New Mexicans won&amp;#8217;t receive unemployment insurance for days due to &amp;#8216;unforeseen system error&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/thousands_of_new_mexicans_won8217t_receive_unemployment_insurance_for_days_due_to_8216unforeseen_sys/#comment-6977860</link><description>I agree mate! it wasn't indeed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Insurancequotes</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 10:32:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ABQ&amp;#8217;s election fund will meet demand, officials say</title><link>http://nmindependent.disqus.com/abq8217s_election_fund_will_meet_demand_officials_say/#comment-6968633</link><description>Seed money is capped at 10% of the distribution.  With the numbers we're using that would be about $32,800, 328 contributions of $100.  Will be interesting to see if there is any pattern to each candidate's "seed donors".   Like say, developer money or City employees.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">norton73</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:35:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>