<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for nickgonzalez</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-e7cb7008" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/nickgonzalez/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:48:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Michael Jackson’s Massive Impact (On Google, Facebook, and Yahoo)</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/06/26/michael-jackson-web-impact/#comment-11808665</link><description>I think Facebook is more popular than Twitter on AddThis because of the way people use the two services is different. Granted, there are many more FB users than Twitter users. However, I think there is a bias in just looking at the button data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People tend to use retweet buttons or paste links in clients to spread links on Twitter. Facebook is popular on share this and add this because the process to go to &lt;a href="http://Facebook.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Facebook.com&lt;/a&gt; and share a link is more complicated. At least that's what I've noticed from my own sites.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:48:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Grou.ps comes together with funding, business models</title><link>http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/06/25/groups-comes-together-with-funding-business-models/#comment-11743665</link><description>Congrats Emre</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:51:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Matters in Most Word-of-Mouth Marketing?</title><link>http://www.scottmonty.com/2009/06/what-matters-in-most-word-of-mouth.html#comment-11584023</link><description>This seems very possible for companies that have a lot of play in pricing their goods. Apple has both dropped prices and increased benefit with their new line of computers and iphones.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think this pushes the conversation toward enhancing products with low cost additions that add high benefits in context. Apple's developer platform is a great example. Relatively low cost for Apple, with a high benefit for users.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But how does this work for commodity goods?&lt;br&gt;How does General Mills increase value to defend cereal prices? Puzzles on the back of the boxes?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:20:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bit.ly + Google Analytics Campaign Builder Tool</title><link>http://blog.bit.ly/post/128103040#comment-11581861</link><description>Awesome.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:07:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome to VentureBeat&amp;#8217;s new design</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/06/14/welcome-to-venturebeats-new-design/#comment-10938827</link><description>Looks nice Matt.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:55:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Me On MySpace On CNN</title><link>http://parislemon.com/2009/06/me-on-myspace-on-cnn.html#comment-10644313</link><description>Kudos, MG. Good to see CNN is embracing bloggers, while the new york times is, well, not.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:24:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Boot Camp, New York</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/social-media-boot-camp-new-york-2/#comment-9738482</link><description>Thanks for leaving a note. Really glad it resonated.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:09:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast on Social Media: Caring For Customers With Hammers</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/comcast-on-social-media-from-trouble-to-twitter/#comment-8580102</link><description>Thanks for the correction, Bart. Good to hear, and companies beware of Customer Circus.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:37:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marketing On MySpace Generates A 28% ROI</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/marketing-on-myspace-generates-a-28-roi/#comment-8461353</link><description>The 28% figure comes from the client spending $1 million on an ad campaign that was linked to $1.28 million in in store sales by looking at the change in purchasing behavior between a group exposed to the campaign, and a control group not exposed to the campaign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For every $1 the advertiser spent, they got $1.28 in revenue, resulting in a 28% return on their investment in the ad campaign.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:10:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Learn Social Media In Chicago, April 16</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/learn-social-media-in-chicago-april-16/#comment-8119466</link><description>Leo Burnett Building&lt;br&gt;Starbar Room, 21st floor&lt;br&gt;35 W. Wacker Dr.&lt;br&gt;Chicago, IL 60601</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:38:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 4 Realz? Facebook Adds SMS To Fan Pages</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/4-realz-facebook-adds-sms-to-fan-pages/#comment-7566636</link><description>Wow. Guess they don't support T-Mobile</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:05:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogs are red, huge web sites are blue&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2009/03/25/blogs-are-red-huge-web-sites-are-blue/#comment-7509121</link><description>That is incredibly cool and pretty.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How appropriate that the whole internet averages to one bland gray mass...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:07:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Recession Hits Home On Facebook</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/the-recession-hits-home-on-facebook/#comment-7473552</link><description>Thanks for stopping by. Seems like it's a trailing indicator. Google trends captured the uptick a lot earlier. Granted, there are probably even better ways of tracking the pulse by looking at chat and user to user messages, but that crosses the privacy boundary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does Ping.FM have anything to add?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:45:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Social Media is More Measurable Than Traditional Media</title><link>http://www.jmorganmarketing.com/social-media-more-measurable-than-traditional-media/#comment-7261368</link><description>I think there's too much of a focus on "social media" as a single entity. It's not one marketing channel, but instead several, which can each have their own success metrics attached. Apps have users and time on site, Twitter has followers and responses. The "social media" industry needs to do a better job of packaging social media as a product. Products have a defined process and verifiable results.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When we say social media is more measurable but punt on the question of ROI, we're being lazy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:25:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Need Google&amp;#8217;s Behavioral Targetting Right Now?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/google-turns-on-behavioral-targeting/#comment-7152630</link><description>I'm not saying that ads don't need to be targeted, just that advertisers aren't suffering from a lack of targeting. We can already target ads down to users based on gender, location, language, interests... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They're suffering from a lack of experience.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:09:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MySpaceID Getting A Much Needed Upgrade</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/myspaceid-getting-an-upgrade/#comment-6949054</link><description>I'm really excited to see the new version. Any ideas on a release date?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:22:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quiznos Giving Away Subs For Subscriptions</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/quiznos-giving-away-subs-for-subscriptions/#comment-6536110</link><description>Could be, but I think at least a "share this" link could help. Definitely just dipping their toes in it. On a side note, I still haven't received my email for a free sub....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:30:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cow Gives Birth To A Man, And I&amp;#8217;m Supposed To Want Raybans?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/cow-gives-birth-to-a-man-and-im-supposed-to-want-raybans/#comment-5048955</link><description>I agree, it's funky when Rayban used to be cool.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:48:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 10 Words Making Marketing Execs Sick In 2009</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/top-10-words-marketing-execs-are-sick/#comment-5048914</link><description>Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:46:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 10 Words Making Marketing Execs Sick In 2009</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/top-10-words-marketing-execs-are-sick/#comment-5048891</link><description>It will be coming out in pieces mid January, and be fully available online in february.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:45:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My 3 Goals For 2009</title><link>http://www.rajivdoshi.com/post/67862612#comment-5001687</link><description>I think I need to do the same...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:43:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Still Growing, A Lot</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/social-media-still-growing-a-lot/#comment-4930741</link><description>Microsoft has always had a problem with branding their products (windows/Vista). Their web presence was MSN, then switched to &lt;a href="http://live.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;live.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/2100-1038_3-6153879.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://news.cnet.com/2100-1038_3-6153879.html&lt;/a&gt; . Now live search may become Kumo (&lt;a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/23/microsoft-to-rebrand-search-will-it-be-kumo/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/23/microsoft-...&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's a pity because MSFT was working on some pretty slick features such as desktop/web photo syncing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:43:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Still Growing, A Lot</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/social-media-still-growing-a-lot/#comment-4804836</link><description>I take it you use MySpace?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:07:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zune became self-aware at 2:00 AM December 31, 2008</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/12/31/zune-became-self-aware-at-200-am-december-31-2008/#comment-4804651</link><description>At 2am the Zune became self aware recognized itself in a mirror and ended it after discovering it wasn't an ipod</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:54:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Apple Losing It&amp;#8217;s Social Media Mojo?</title><link>http://blog.socialmedia.com/is-apple-losing-its-social-media-mojo/#comment-4731209</link><description>But growing market share takes away from the idea that it's rebellious. My point is that ubiquity breeds banality, which undercuts the idea that people "buy apple" as a cultural statement. People may still buy apple because it's better, but shunning their core audience is bound to cost them much of the free publicity they get from their cult following.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nickgonzalez</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:06:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>