<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for netik</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/netik/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:54:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter Follower Notifications: Now With More Cowbell</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/twitter_follower_notifications_now_with_more_cowbell/#comment-9077268</link><description>The mail is in mime-multipart. If clients want to process the html, they can. If they want to use the text version (attached to the same mail) they can.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">netik</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:54:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SCHED* SXSW 2009 Schedule + Blog Coverage + More</title><link>http://sxsw09sched.disqus.com/sched_sxsw_2009_schedule_blog_coverage_more_282/#comment-6444347</link><description>Can I ask why "Gothic" or "Industrial" never seems to make the cut? Or does that just get lumped in with "Electronic" and "Avant/Experimental" ?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">netik</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:14:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SCHED* SXSW 2009 Schedule + Blog Coverage + More</title><link>http://sxsw09sched.disqus.com/sched_sxsw_2009_schedule_blog_coverage_more_96/#comment-6435123</link><description>What, no San Francisco? (or, is there no SF Showcase?) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Indie Rock scene here is booming.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">netik</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:58:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Hacked</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/twitter_hacked/#comment-4932654</link><description>I really appreciated your openess, John. It's good to know what actually happened. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The full conversation is on Qik: &lt;a href="http://qik.com/twit#v=813128" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://qik.com/twit#v=813128&lt;/a&gt; (along with other videos of the revelry last night) Our conversation begins about 3 minutes in at the 10:00 mark. It was good meeting you too - sorry about the camera work!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:01:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Hacked</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/twitter_hacked/#comment-4930562</link><description>Leo has cut out some of the discussion I had with him here, but, basically, an admin tool was abused allowing a rogue user to modify some accounts on Twitter. As described in our status blog at &lt;a href="http://status.twitter.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;status.twitter.com&lt;/a&gt;, we have modified our site to restrict admin privileges to appropriate users and to prevent the abuse that allowed this attack to occur. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please understand that our staff is on the job and we will do all we can to protect our users, and have dedicated a team of engineers to this issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice meeting you this evening, Leo.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">netik</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:16:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leopard on the Hackintosh</title><link>http://retinatech.disqus.com/leopard_on_the_hackintosh/#comment-3995799</link><description>I can send you a kext if you need one, email me at &lt;a href="mailto:jna@retina.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;jna@retina.net&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">netik</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:29:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Real Life Fail Whale</title><link>http://geekedinfo.disqus.com/real_life_fail_whale/#comment-3669655</link><description>Nice. I think I'll pass it around TwitHQ</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">netik</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:41:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Election Night Celebrations with Twitter, Digg &amp;#038; Current</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/election_night_celebrations_with_twitter_digg_038_current/#comment-3621269</link><description>re: red begbie &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We switched around between CNN, current, and MSNBC. We wanted as much information as we could get.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">netik</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 07:11:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Monochrom &amp;#038; Laughing Squid Drinkup at Lucky 13</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/monochrom_038_laughing_squid_drinkup_at_lucky_13/#comment-2755501</link><description>so there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">netik</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:42:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: As Twitter Regains Footing, Competitors' Growth Stalls</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_as_twitter_regains_footing_competitors_growth_stalls/#comment-2367806</link><description>Gee, you think that's because Twitter -bought- summize and is busily integrating features from Summize into the main site?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">netik</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:50:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Live Feed Kills Twitter &amp;#038; FriendFeed</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_live_feed_kills_twitter_038_friendfeed/#comment-1918164</link><description>It's funny that you say that ... a few minutes after this, news feed items were flying by.  Can you really pay attention to a million news stories moving by rapid fire?  While it looks cool, it doesn't seem very useful.  It's the same problem with following thousands of people on Twitter ... it just doesn't work</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">biznickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:45:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Live Feed Kills Twitter &amp;#038; FriendFeed</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_live_feed_kills_twitter_038_friendfeed/#comment-1915961</link><description>I guess in a way the video demonstrates why Twitter is still more fun. The update rate is extremely slow and that's not software related; it's simply because people are not as chatty on Facebook as they are on a dedicated service like Twitter. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If an app or API comes out and is regularly used, we might see more use (Adium now supports Facebook chat, for example), but what I get now out of Adium's facebook chat are the same 20-30 status messages over and over again. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then again, I'm biased. I work there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">netik</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:39:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Macjournal, how I love you.</title><link>http://retinatech.disqus.com/macjournal_how_i_love_you/#comment-1841294</link><description>While I enjoy evernote's features, I don't like the idea of storing my data on someone else's servers. I work in Operations and Security, and have many things which really shouldn't ever leave an encrypted file on my machine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MacJournal handles that, and the autoencrypt feature really helps out with keeping my data secure.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">netik</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:59:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>