<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for nacho</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/nacho/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:07:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Mobile Industry Review turns into a weekly newsletter next Friday</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/mobile_industry_review_turns_into_a_weekly_newsletter_next_friday/#comment-20994691</link><description>If the newsletter is going to come out on a workday, ie Friday, I rather get an email. Why? &lt;br&gt;Because with the amount of people whose employers have banned "not-working" sites (ie: facebook and twitter) while in the office, it seems only fair using good old email as delivery method. Also, through disqus, you can also respond to comments by replying to the email messages. &lt;br&gt;A newsletter in a format ok with mobile phones will also be a good thing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nacho</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:07:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who&amp;#8217;s the arse using his phone for directions?  Me!</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/who8217s_the_arse_using_his_phone_for_directions_me/#comment-19685056</link><description>Classic!!! It happens in the best families ;-). It has happened to me a couple of times and my nine year old daughter has been v unimpressed when I try to find my way around Clapham. I have to say that my HTC did impress a Sao Paulo taxi driver when I managed to get better driving and walking directions in googlemaps for him. My boss was also impressed ;-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nacho</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:45:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scrub &amp;#8211; sniff out missing info from contacts</title><link>http://windowsmobileapps.disqus.com/scrub_8211_sniff_out_missing_info_from_contacts/#comment-19613585</link><description>Scrub is very effective and would love to see the suggestions in this review above implemented! Also how about merging similar/identical contacts? Or the ability to delete contacts?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nacho</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:30:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The best network for the iPhone in the UK: Orange</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/the_best_network_for_the_iphone_in_the_uk_orange/#comment-19484470</link><description>&lt;a href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/ifi/licensing/classes/broadband/cellular/3g/maps/3gmaps/coverage_maps.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ofcom.org.uk/radiocomms/ifi/licensin...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">derosnec</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:55:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The best network for the iPhone in the UK: Orange</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/the_best_network_for_the_iphone_in_the_uk_orange/#comment-19461681</link><description>It is interesting, this is exactly what I hear from Orange users. My friends&lt;br&gt;using Orange struggle with coverage and agree that they stay with Orange&lt;br&gt;because of a) cheaper tariffs b) can't be arsed to change networks. Indeed&lt;br&gt;my friends is a limited sample but again, I would like to read some research&lt;br&gt;about data connection/coverage etc&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2009/10/7 Disqus &amp;lt;&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nacho</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:50:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The best network for the iPhone in the UK: Orange</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/the_best_network_for_the_iphone_in_the_uk_orange/#comment-19454920</link><description>I am not sure if Orange is right for the iPhone but let's hope it is. &lt;br&gt;Is there any independent research available that tells consumers about the data coverage etc of the UK networks?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nacho</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:41:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Short Transmissions for Wednesday</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/short_transmissions_for_wednesday/#comment-18277830</link><description>Which settings? Disqus or in MIR?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nacho</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:37:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Short Transmissions for Wednesday</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/short_transmissions_for_wednesday/#comment-17903974</link><description>I think you can actually change your subscription type so that you get the full text, Nacho</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smstextnews</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:36:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Short Transmissions for Wednesday</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/short_transmissions_for_wednesday/#comment-17903269</link><description>Absolutely, it makes more sense, particularly if you're reading your email on a mobile&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;N</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nacho</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:32:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Short Transmissions for Wednesday</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/short_transmissions_for_wednesday/#comment-17902870</link><description>Good feedback Nacho.  RE: The email, I know -- what do you think about that?  It's the default setting. Would you rather get more?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smstextnews</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:23:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Short Transmissions for Wednesday</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/short_transmissions_for_wednesday/#comment-17902700</link><description>Keep it short and sweet, makes better read. The email message only has the first few lines though!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nacho</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:20:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia buys Dopplr. Right on.</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/nokia_buys_dopplr_right_on/#comment-17283863</link><description>I'm all for new things and innovation so, let's hope it works out well!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nacho</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:10:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia buys Dopplr. Right on.</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/nokia_buys_dopplr_right_on/#comment-17262309</link><description>I'm actually quite excited to see Nokia continuing to make these kind of acquisitions Nacho!  But you know me, if I look too closely at Nokia, I simply can't stand the slow pace and somewhat continually crazy decisions the company often takes...  here's hoping it'll work out well!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smstextnews</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:07:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia buys Dopplr. Right on.</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/nokia_buys_dopplr_right_on/#comment-17259890</link><description>Good for him! But for Nokia? What's your experience with dopplr?&lt;br&gt; It never works for me while &lt;a href="http://www.tripit.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;tripit &lt;/a&gt; is always spot on! &lt;br&gt;I feel I agree more with what &lt;A href="http://gigaom.com/2009/09/23/dopplr-commits-hara-kiri-sells-to-nokia/" rel=nofollow rel="nofollow"&gt;Om Malik posted in his blog&lt;/A&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nacho</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:13:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Forced to Reveal Identity of Offensive Blogger</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/google_forced_to_reveal_identity_of_offensive_blogger/#comment-15330459</link><description>Thank you, Nacho, that was EXACTLY the case I was thinking of.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TariAkpodiete</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:18:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Forced to Reveal Identity of Offensive Blogger</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/google_forced_to_reveal_identity_of_offensive_blogger/#comment-15119282</link><description>Well, maybe not in Iran, but how about China? It has happened already .. back in 2005</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nacho</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:19:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Forced to Reveal Identity of Offensive Blogger</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/google_forced_to_reveal_identity_of_offensive_blogger/#comment-15119211</link><description>Cheers, that is exactly my point! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The blogger's comment was out of order and the model taking it seriously is even more frivolous but a judge requesting Google to reveal the identity of the blogger is way out of line. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know totalitarian goverments have forced Google, Yahoo et al to comply with their repressive laws in their countries but this judgement might set a precedent against civil liberties.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nacho</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:17:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Forced to Reveal Identity of Offensive Blogger</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/google_forced_to_reveal_identity_of_offensive_blogger/#comment-15075427</link><description>Well, maybe not in Iran, but how about China? It has happened already .. back in 2005&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/07/business/worldbusiness/07iht-yahoo.html?_r=1" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/07/business/worl...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nacho</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:33:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Forced to Reveal Identity of Offensive Blogger</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/google_forced_to_reveal_identity_of_offensive_blogger/#comment-15066074</link><description>Not sure how good of a point this really is. I don't see how non-American citizens and/or foreign countries/leaders can use American laws to further thier goals and aims in their country in a case like this. If Google/Twitter/Facebook, etc. were based in Iran or elsewhere, then that citizen/leader would then have a better chance of forcing the identity release of anonymous commentors/bloggers. I just don't see how this would work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beauty</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:45:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Forced to Reveal Identity of Offensive Blogger</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/google_forced_to_reveal_identity_of_offensive_blogger/#comment-15061971</link><description>I agree that this might have set a precedent for forcing ISPs and content providers, etc. to reveal the identities of anonymous bloggers/posters/etc. However, I don't believe that any US based company would have to fear a foreign court order to reveal people's identities. At least, I would HOPE they could ignore such legal threats.  What is Ahmadinejad going to do? March on Google?  Invade the US to force the issue?  Unlikely.  But, your point is well taken.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Les</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:47:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Forced to Reveal Identity of Offensive Blogger</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/google_forced_to_reveal_identity_of_offensive_blogger/#comment-15060205</link><description>Very good point! I think this just went a little too far.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Janiece</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:15:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Forced to Reveal Identity of Offensive Blogger</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/google_forced_to_reveal_identity_of_offensive_blogger/#comment-15056665</link><description>nacho, that's actually, a VERY good point. this particular case is frivolous, BUT the wider implications are frightening. people - usually Americans - who rant (incorrectly) about free speech forget that in some parts of the world there's no such thing as the right to safely speak out against one's government. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;in places like Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia (America's "friend"), many dictatorships in Africa &amp; South America, not to mention China, speaking one's mind - or being one's self (like gay, for example) can actually get you imprisoned, and or thrown off a roof and even hung, drawn and quartered, by the government.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TariAkpodiete</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:32:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Forced to Reveal Identity of Offensive Blogger</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/google_forced_to_reveal_identity_of_offensive_blogger/#comment-15053504</link><description>That was a heck of a comment! +1</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Urziel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:36:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Forced to Reveal Identity of Offensive Blogger</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/google_forced_to_reveal_identity_of_offensive_blogger/#comment-15052937</link><description>what's next? Ahmadinejad forcing Google/Twitter/Facebook to reveal the names about those reporting on the post-election crackdown of opposition in Iran?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nacho</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:19:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What happened to the good old days of buying a mobile phone? (Or, why I&amp;#8217;ve stopped being a Nokia customer)</title><link>http://smstextnews.disqus.com/what_happened_to_the_good_old_days_of_buying_a_mobile_phone_or_why_i8217ve_stopped_being_a_nokia_cus/#comment-12736408</link><description>To have freedom of choice as a consumer, you're probably better off buying a handset unlocked but to get a first-rate phone you must pay a fortune. So you have to find a way around those hurdles.&lt;br&gt;I'm not going to suggest you move flats but have you considered taking the phone providers to court for not covering London SW??!!! ;-) &lt;br&gt;It is hard to believe that in 2009 there's a bit of London not properly covered by all the main providers.&lt;br&gt;I'd do something along the lines of what @terenceEden suggested, buy the handset with a low-end contract, get it unlocked and then try to get rid of the contract, maybe passing it to someone else in the family or a friend.&lt;br&gt;Shop around, maybe some obscure reseller will give you the handset you want in the network you want. O2 doesn't sell the HTC HD for example but you can buy it at the CPW in the O2 network.. you get my drift. I've seen little shops around selling phones that I've never seen in the operators' own shops or in the big retailers. &lt;br&gt;Anyway, good luck with your mobile hunting!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nacho</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:33:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>