<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for mrshl</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-8e1e23d1" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/mrshl/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:00:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Joe Lieberman and Democrats are breaking up?</title><link>http://mrshl.net/joe-lieberman-and-democrats-are-breaking-up/#comment-2183654</link><description>No, no. Libertarians are relatively dogmatic in their belief that government&lt;br&gt;should have almost no regulatory role in the lives of its citizens. I don't&lt;br&gt;believe that at all. I do believe in paying our bills with sensible taxes&lt;br&gt;and sensible spending. I also believe the federal government should&lt;br&gt;generally abstain from regulating the sex lives of consenting adults. Where&lt;br&gt;I differ with libertarians is my belief that some federal regulation is&lt;br&gt;required in the financial, environmental, and healthcare sections of the&lt;br&gt;American economy. I am a man in the middle, my friend.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:00:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bookmarking in Google’s Chrome Browser</title><link>http://www.cloudnotes.net/2008/09/bookmarking-in-googles-chrome-browser.html#comment-2095457</link><description>Well, I think it's got a lot of impressive features that have been amply&lt;br&gt;covered on other sites. I'm covering one particular aspect of the browser.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:50:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts on Tumblr Explore &amp; Open API’s
 In... - Joe Lazarus</title><link>http://joelaz.com/post/48609964#comment-2060617</link><description>Agree 100%. I originally found your blog and Tumblr sites when I began wondering why Tumblr didn't have a more robust recommendation engine the way Delicious or StumbleUpon do. Sure Tumblr's a blogging site, but it's one that gets a ton of standardized content submissions from its bookmark as well as a treasure trove of reblog data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately, they haven't done much to leverage all that data, and the lack of an API keeps anyone else from using it either. Bummer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:50:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight won&amp;rsquo;t be Heath Ledger&amp;rsquo;s last film</title><link>http://mrshl.net/the-dark-knight-wont-be-heath-ledgers-last-film/#comment-1814157</link><description>I loved &lt;i&gt;The Adventures of Baron Munchhausen&lt;/i&gt;, but it's still regarded as one of the greatest flops of all time. I tried to get my friends to love it, but provoked the opposite response. This happens a lot for me, though. It's not really limited to Terry Gilliam movies.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:12:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Test post</title><link>http://nonalignmentpact.blogspot.com/2008/08/test-post.html#comment-1780356</link><description>this is the alternate comment system i mentioned. obviously, the downside is that we'd have to have a separate login for the comment system. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the upside is that we get threaded comments on the same page, better spam protection, and a comment system we can alter using CSS if we want to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;we can still use the built-in comment system if we want. but if we want to use a custom template (like this three column version) we'd have to use the old-style blogger comment system rather than the one that updates on the same page.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:01:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Test post</title><link>http://nonalignmentpact.blogspot.com/2008/08/test-post.html#comment-1780320</link><description>once we decide on a template design, we can just convert the existing site to the new template. we won't use this test site. so all the posts will remain undisturbed and with their original owners.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:56:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Test post</title><link>http://nonalignmentpact.blogspot.com/2008/08/test-post.html#comment-1778566</link><description>This is what a reply looks like.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:11:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Test post</title><link>http://nonalignmentpact.blogspot.com/2008/08/test-post.html#comment-1778564</link><description>This is a test comment</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:11:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Songbird 0.7
 An iTunes replacement + music... - Joe Lazarus</title><link>http://joelaz.com/post/46788911#comment-1715666</link><description>The lack of a folder-watch feature is killing me. Adding folders manually is a drag. Same problem iTunes has, but for different reasons, of course.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:56:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using Evernote Mobile in the real world</title><link>http://www.cloudnotes.net/2008/06/using-evernote-mobile-in-real-world.html#comment-1715493</link><description>I still use Google Notebook. It handles text notes better than any other notebook I've seen. It's speed and ease of use that matters to me, and Google Notebook is faster and easier than Evernote.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:34:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Diigo loses me again.</title><link>http://www.cloudnotes.net/2008/08/diigo-loses-me-again.html#comment-1575467</link><description>I should emphasize that my problem isn't only with the downtime. It's also with the much slower speed at which I can access my bookmarks. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm hopeful you guys can address this issue, as its crucial to whether I can even use the service. Social capabilities are impressive, but I need quick, responsive reference to my bookmarks in order for your service to be useful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for your Firefox addon, I remember upgrading to Firefox 3 and checking whether your service was compatible. From what I remember, Delicious was faster in releasing a Firefox 3 compatible addon than you guys were. Perhaps I'm mistaken.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Either way, I have been testing your latest version, and it's still much slower than Delicious. Part of this, I know, is that the Delicious addon is using a client-site query to speed up searching while you guys are using the Web. Still, even for a Web query, the Diigo addon has been pretty slow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, as I said in the post, I REALLY want to like Diigo. But I keep running into bugs and performance issues. Iron those out, and I'll definitely give you another shot.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:10:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AOL buys SocialThing &amp;#8212; but why?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/15/aol-buys-socialthing-but-why/#comment-1480129</link><description>I love SocialThing!, but it serves a completely different purpose than FriendFeed. It's genius is the ability to collect all your friends from the multitude of services you use without having to bug people to join up with ANOTHER social media site. Since most of my friends are NOT on FF, SocialThing works as a kind of social Google Reader for pals who use Flickr and Twitter, but are unlikely to join FF.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:46:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why create a custom search engine out of your bookmarks?</title><link>http://www.cloudnotes.net/2008/08/why-create-custom-search-engine-out-of.html#comment-1223267</link><description>Actually, web based bookmarking purely for reference MIGHT be over for lots of people. If indeed it ever began.  So many people just type things into Google nowadays. But as I think you said, many people use bookmarking services as inputs for their blogs or FriendFeed or for other social reasons. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As I understand your suggestion, using a CSE consisting of your own bookmarks doesn't have any social uses: it's purely for reference. If I understand correctly, I can probably do the same thing you're doing using either Google's Web History OR Firefox's Awesome Bar, and I can pick and choose when I want to add a bookmark. That is to say, my Web history's being captured anyway, but I can actively bookmark (or star) something if I want to leave an extra breadcrumb for myself.  But neither option is particularly shareable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, if you tell me that other folks can access and contribute to your CSE, I would say THAT is starting to get interesting. Even I might consider using your method for collaborative situations where group reference might be necessary. A lot of startups are trying to solve the same problem (e.g., Twine).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Honestly, I've wondered how relevant personal reference bookmarking is, even for myself. Why? Because I use both Web history and Firefox as a kind of passive notebook, with great results. The "Awesome Bar," in particular, is incredible in its accuracy even after typing only a few letters. I supplement them with Delicious, of course. I love Delicious. But I wonder sometimes if Delicious will remain relevant for me as a pure reference tool (as opposed to a sharing tool).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and thanks for commenting. It's never my intention to sound like I'm whooping on anyone. But I give credit when I talk about someone else's ideas. And I guess credit can cut both ways.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:02:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tumblr might be fumbling its new release</title><link>http://www.cloudnotes.net/2008/08/tumblr-might-be-fumbling-its-new.html#comment-1208697</link><description>Yeah, their phased update plan seemed pretty clear to me, but I can see the potential for confusion. Overall, I'm pretty stoked to see some new features added to what might be my favorite blogging platform.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:01:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social|Median was not a good experience</title><link>http://www.cloudnotes.net/2008/08/socialmedian-was-not-good-experience.html#comment-1168058</link><description>I found the concept incredibly useful. Perhaps when they get it all worked out, I can reactivate my account. I'm just reporting my relatively poor first impression.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:34:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: life is a thrill</title><link>http://www.lifeisathrill.com/post/45332422#comment-1160271</link><description>I think that's the second time I've bookmarked the League here. This time to your custom domain name.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:38:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: life is a thrill</title><link>http://www.lifeisathrill.com/post/45345944#comment-1160252</link><description>Jeremy, since you're the only one who ever comments here, you really should register with Disqus. That way your comments will actually tracked. Registering can even help you associate your old comments with your new ID. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and did you know you could use this same threaded comment system (and spam protection) on your Blogger install? I use the same comment system on my other blogs: &lt;a href="http://mrshl.net"&gt;mrshl.net&lt;/a&gt; &amp; &lt;a href="http://cloudnotes.net"&gt;cloudnotes.net&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:37:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My wife is awesome</title><link>http://mrshl.net/my-wife-is-awesome/#comment-1152754</link><description>excellent. i'd like to start posting here more often, so definitely come back.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:21:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Evernote. Why it will make it &amp;amp; 20 Awesome Ways to Use It.</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2179/evernote-why-it-will-make-it-20-awesome-ways-to-use-it/#comment-1134799</link><description>Evernote's incredibly well done and has tons of features. But it's still not optimized for handling basic text. Even though its Web-based version recently added rich text editing, neither the Web version or the Windows clients allows you to use simple keyboard shortcuts (e.g., ctrl-B, ctrl-I). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And there's too much friction in the editing process. Why do I have to click "edit" just to edit something? I want to click in a text field and start typing. I want to be able to click on a note and type new tags directly into the tags field.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Evernote is loaded, but it's not fast. It misses the mark on the most basic features: editing my texts and tags. I hope it gets better. But until it does I'm sticking to OneNote and Google Notebook.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:12:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Take a Google Reader Shared Item Viral Using Notes</title><link>http://www.louisgray.com/live/2008/08/take-google-reader-shared-item-viral.html#comment-1079350</link><description>And what terrible thing will happen to me if I refuse continue the "chain"?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:12:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clip web pages to OneNote with new Firefox add-on</title><link>http://www.cloudnotes.net/2008/07/clip-web-pages-to-onenote-with-new.html#comment-908980</link><description>Yeah, I agree. It's not too useful right now. But I want to encourage further development, so I don't want to sound too harsh.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:35:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Swurl and Second Brain: Feeding your past into the present</title><link>http://www.cloudnotes.net/2008/07/swurl-and-second-brain-feeding-your.html#comment-880189</link><description>Personally, I think SocialThing is by far the slickest looking aggregator, and it's the best way to view activity from my friends (Swurl needs to work on that). But could you clarify how I might be able to view my past activity on SocialThing? I can't seem to find a "back" button. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I suppose I could just scroll down forever, but a timeline or archive function would make things a lot easier.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:50:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: I Woke Up to My First Disqus Comment Spam Attack</title><link>http://www.louisgray.com/live/2008/07/i-woke-up-to-my-first-disqus-comment.html#comment-871564</link><description>I use it on three blogs, and I think I've had maybe 2 spam comments. I don't come close to your traffic, though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 01:05:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: life is a thrill</title><link>http://www.lifeisathrill.com/post/41557870#comment-845024</link><description>Thanks for being the only one of about 50 readers to ever comment on this thing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:01:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Del.icio.us vs. Friendfeed</title><link>http://www.cloudnotes.net/2008/07/delicious-vs-friendfeed.html#comment-828531</link><description>you're welcome! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the new windows live writer makes it super easy to put tables in your blog post. i think a good table is worth a1000 words.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrshl</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:41:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>