<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for mergatroid</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/mergatroid/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/mergatroid/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:35:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://k24anson.tumblr.com/post/7610719219</title><link>http://k24anson.tumblr.com/post/7610719219#comment-251957145</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My big nose is a jump-off point topic of conversation too, to strangers, right off the bat,  … 'ya know?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mergatroid</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:35:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Behar: Sarah Palin is Cheney in a Dress (VIDEO)</title><link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2008/10/behar-sarah-palin-is-cheney-in-a-dress-video/#comment-3078117</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think if the producers simply removed the audience participation then the four Views would be able to conduct a lengthy and informative conversation, dialogue. Ms. Behar wouldn't always sound so cocky without the audience stroking her. Seems like the other three try to appear sensible, is that the right word? Though whatever they bring up to talk about is so trivial and mundane. I don't think I would be in the habit to watch this show if I were able to do so regularly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mergatroid</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:07:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saraâ€™cuda Vs. Joe â€˜Gaffemasterâ€™ Biden (VIDEOs)</title><link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2008/10/saracuda-vs-joe-gaffemaster-biden/#comment-2916455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fifty years old and my sexual identity is secure. My emotional side? At times I find it difficult to reign in these outbursts, "Woo-hoo! Everyone, listen. I'm in love with Sarah!"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mergatroid</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:54:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The View Fight Against Elisabeth on Ayers (VIDEO)</title><link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2008/10/the-view-fight-against-elisabeth-on-ayers-video/#comment-2916295</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So how does someone with a dubious past remain active in the political process? I speak for myself somewhat ..., I'm not going away either.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What type of input does this Weather Underground guy offer to the Obama power base? How and what is he contributing to further the ideals of Obama?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If I were a paid supporter of McCain, incognito  and with my dubious background, exposing my affiliation with his crew would be an eventual plus for his character and for the nation as a whole. I would be a plus only because of what would be revealed having contributed to what McCain and the Republican Party stands for. My dubious background may have some wonder if there wasn't a better way to accomplish what I contributed, doing so without moi. Whatever, my contribution would be revealed, the public would realize my contribution is for the best of what the McCain crowd is all about, and my counterattacking rhetoric would be awesome, I imagine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why would I want to make waves unnecesSarahly though? Why rock the boat? It would be best for John and his run for the Presidency if someone such as myself stayed out of the limelight.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My ideals wouldn't fit in thus I have little to contribute to the Obama crowd, though. It's best if I remain incognito with John and his crew. I'm no badge of honor for the McCain crowd to publicly display, whatever contribution I offer. Obama is wearing these Weather Underground guys like a badge though, for the votes it'll garner from that part of the Democratic Party. Fine that this is so, but what are the WU guys contributing to the Obama ticket? Is it only for the vote from a certain block of radical Democrats they want? Ok, then they set themselves out for attack on this stance. Sarah's broadsides are warranted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The day the first nuclear terrorist expression happens and this kind of talk turns on its head.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm thinking out loud as I write this, and I have no concluding thought at the moment. So it goes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mergatroid</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:38:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bill Maher and Panel Excoriate Palin (VIDEO)</title><link>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2008/10/bill-maher-and-panel-excoriate-palin-video/#comment-2902010</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Democrats like to sprinkle one or two serious comments into all the silly salad talk. Impractical solutions like "engage with the adversary." Like Clinton and Arafat engagements, and Bill today still isn't recognized as a patsy, a sucker. And these guys want to and advocate the same now with the mullahs. And the dopey audience applauds. Islamist leaders of nations are commanded by their book to work and sacrifice all to bring Sharia laws over the people of the earth, and the average muslim is only a pawn to this end. Every terrorist incident, from plane hijackings in the 1960's, to 9/11, and the present day calamities in the world finds its root cause in this belief in having Sharia Laws dominate the people of the earth. The average muslim doesn't get it and are lukewarm moderates, but the educated Islamist leaders do get it and are passionate to this end.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Immature, naive American men and women talking together. It's weird to listen to knowing that they'll never wise up. Democrats are dangerous.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;• |*&lt;br&gt; —&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mergatroid</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:35:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: mediabistro.com: FishbowlDC</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/fishbowldc/twice-in-one-week-the-white-house-goes-after-the-media/12899#comment-532513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Since the 1960's Islamists have been attacking the West by hijacking and blowing up airplanes. They got closer with the 1993 World Trade Center basement bombing, and we only caught them because two of the numbskulls actually went back to the rental place where they got the van, AND ASKED FOR THE REFUND ON THE DEPOSIT THEY PUT DOWN ON THE VAN THAT CARRIED THE EXPLOSIVES TO THE BASEMENT!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Islamisits then fly three airplanes on suicide missions on 9/11. Iranian leaders today want a nuclear device and material for their more violent friends to spread around and dirty up an urban area or two every so often.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Today, two of their nations  are down. We may need two or three more "taken down" over the next two or three decades. A lethal threat exists and to read the words and thoughts in some people ...? Wow. How does anyone not perceive a serious lethal threat to the Islamists anymore. If you don't, you've got a couple of lose screws in your canoes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mergatroid</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 20:13:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>