<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for marklise</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/marklise/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:31:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google: Afraid of looking like a bully?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/google_afraid_of_looking_like_a_bully/#comment-316452</link><description>Exactly, Mark -- I thought the same thing.  If it's that simple, how&lt;br&gt;could it possibly be considered proprietary in any way?  My email apps&lt;br&gt;all look the same too, and so do the various IM clients I use, but&lt;br&gt;nobody gets upset about that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mathewi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:31:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google: Afraid of looking like a bully?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/google_afraid_of_looking_like_a_bully/#comment-316429</link><description>Agreed -  Ethan also raises an important question:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Maybe its time to evaluate what the inherent value of Campfire really is, if its so easily duplicated as to cause this latest in a series of stupid blog hand waving?"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marklise</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:26:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Engine: Competitor or knock-off?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/google_engine_competitor_or_knock_off_37/#comment-312349</link><description>Comments by Leah Culver (of Pownce) to Robert Scoble after the announcement echo that statement - it's a valid argument.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marklise</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:18:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Engine: Competitor or knock-off?</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/google_engine_competitor_or_knock_off_37/#comment-310912</link><description>I'd agree with it being classified as a knock-off for now, but I think the plan is definitely to compete in the future.  Python is only temporary, and to dismiss the service based on language alone is a bit premature in my opinion.  The interesting part will be what the next language they'll support is, and how soon that comes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marklise</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:28:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you using Firefox 3? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/are_you_using_firefox_3_scripting_news/#comment-279213</link><description>@Eric @cyprien @shawngrimes, Flock's next release will have FF3 under the hood.  Using Flock 1.3pre - which is FF3 (disclaimer - I work there).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FF3 is a huge performance improvement over FF2.  Most simple add-ons will work the same in FF3, developers just need to update their install.rdf file.  Some will need rework.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marklise</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:17:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>