<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of malletgirl02</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/malletgirl02/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:01:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Saturday Open Thread</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/saturday-open-thread-70/#comment-23109245</link><description>From Crooks and Liars:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Beck: How many people here identify themselves as African Americans? (About a third raise their hands) OK -- Why? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Payne: It's interchangeable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Beck: But wait, wait. Why not identify yourself as Americans?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fritsch: Well, people can look at you and tell you're black. You can't escape that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Beck: Yeah, but I don't identify myself as white, or a white American.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then he goes on to say...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Beck:&lt;i&gt; Because one of the problems that I have -- and I have to tell you, as a white guy, as a white guy, I'm just being real honest with you, as a white guy, I think white people are uncomfortable sometimes saying, 'You know what, Martin Luther King' -- and then quoting Martin Luther King...&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/glenn-beck-gets-ask-dumb-white-guy-q" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/glenn-b...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...same ol' thing. And...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;...the American the African American experience. Is. Overwhelming. Just overwhelming and I think if if the roles were reversed. And I saw the first white guy to be president even if I disagreed with him- &lt;b&gt;unless I thought he was the anti-Christ&lt;/b&gt;, I might go you know what? I want the guy. I want the guy to win, let's just break that barrier...&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...and none of them seemed to catch on to just how stupid, and stupidly conscending, he was being, and none of them reacted to the "anti-Christ" crack.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plantsmantx</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:01:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: President Obama&amp;#8217;s Foreign Trip</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/president-obamas-foreign-trip/#comment-23067408</link><description>"He's a Singaporean sympathizer!!!"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plantsmantx</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:09:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saturday Open Thread</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/saturday-open-thread-70/#comment-23053406</link><description>That obviously is an attempt at deflection from Palin, but having seen Nicole Wallace on cable news several times...I'll bet she really did say that shit:).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, yeah- it's also obvious that the unnamed adviser is Wallace herself.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plantsmantx</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:00:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saturday Open Thread</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/saturday-open-thread-70/#comment-23041181</link><description>Well, if you can stomach watching it, or even clicking a Fox News link, here's the link to the whole thing, broken up into three parts. I've watched the first one, and there's actually a little back-and-forth. Unfortunately, so far, the conversation seems to be a run-through of the usual tired memes ("Why do you call yourselves African Americans?").</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plantsmantx</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:46:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saturday Open Thread</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/saturday-open-thread-70/#comment-23019680</link><description>Well, whether or not he ultimately came off looking like an idiot depends on what he went on to say after the boos.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plantsmantx</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:18:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Saturday Open Thread</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/saturday-open-thread-70/#comment-23010248</link><description>Well, in the snippet of video at the link, no one lays into Beck. The audience catcalls the guy who says he voted for Obama because he thought he was the best candidate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plantsmantx</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:04:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Right Wing Extremists Should Be Barred From The Military</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/right-wing-extremists-should-be-barred-from-the-military/#comment-22911214</link><description>It's not an either/or situation. I'm almost always suspicious of anyone who urges us to "shift the focus", rather than widening it. Besides, when I mentioned their common goal, I wasn't implying that their ultimate goal is to kill black people. To the extent they want to see that happen, it's just a means to an end, that end being the re-establishment of Jim Crow or something like it on a national scale. No, they don't want us to go away- that wouldn't be much fun for them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plantsmantx</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:35:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Right Wing Extremists Should Be Barred From The Military</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/right-wing-extremists-should-be-barred-from-the-military/#comment-22909345</link><description>Matthew Hale.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, all of them don't want to establish a separate white state.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;None of them have reacted with a reign of terror...yet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as putting on a shirt and tie, David Duke was the first to do that, and he is certainly part of the "racialist" movement, just like Taylor. Yeah, I know he's on the "we still need to hate Jews" side of the rift in that movement, but he's still part of it. Taylor,  et al may not want to get their own hands dirty with openly espousing violence, but they certainly sympathize with those who do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The point is, it doesn't matter if they happen to be Klansmen, "scientific racists", or extreme "libertarians", the effect of them seeing their goals come to fruition will have the same basic effect on black people.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plantsmantx</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:07:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thursday Open Thread</title><link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/12/thursday-open-thread-8/#comment-22869972</link><description>hey where's the link LRW?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Val2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:35:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Right Wing Extremists Should Be Barred From The Military</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/right-wing-extremists-should-be-barred-from-the-military/#comment-22836001</link><description>Well, for one thing, I think there's a huge amount of overlap in their agendas. Secondly, if violence is violence regardless, why is it "important" to point out that one group isn't "racialist"? It felt kind of silly to even type that, because the only real difference is that one group admits it is "racialist", and doesn't employ quite as much code and dishonest rhetoric...code and rhetoric that's designed to achieve the exact same goals as those of the admitted "racialists".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plantsmantx</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:37:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Right Wing Extremists Should Be Barred From The Military</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/right-wing-extremists-should-be-barred-from-the-military/#comment-22835169</link><description>Are you saying they're only capable of violence, or fomenting violence, if they're part of the really, really, (really) explicitly "racialist" right? Or are you saying that if they're not out-and-out Klansmen or neo-Nazis, black people shouldn't be concerned? Why shouldn't we be concerned?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plantsmantx</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:25:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Right Wing Extremists Should Be Barred From The Military</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/right-wing-extremists-should-be-barred-from-the-military/#comment-22832536</link><description>"Conservative=extremist."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, it's certainly beginning to look that way.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plantsmantx</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:55:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thursday Open Thread</title><link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/12/thursday-open-thread-8/#comment-22830286</link><description>that was funny as heck.  lol</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Val2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:25:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thursday Open Thread</title><link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/12/thursday-open-thread-8/#comment-22830240</link><description>where is the option that says, let Sammy be Sammy?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That is what I would pick.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Val2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:24:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Michael Steele to White Republicans: &amp;#8220;I&amp;#8217;m on Your Side&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/11/michael-steele-to-white-republicans-im-on-your-side/#comment-22800966</link><description>me 3 carolinagirl.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Val2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:23:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wednesday Open Thread</title><link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/11/wednesday-open-thread-6/#comment-22800229</link><description>lol</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Val2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:02:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: W.E.E. Peeps Wednesday Link Sweep</title><link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/11/w-e-e-peeps-wednesday-link-sweep-5/#comment-22799398</link><description>*snicker</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Val2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:41:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wednesday Open Thread</title><link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/11/wednesday-open-thread-6/#comment-22796056</link><description>It's all about the attention.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Val2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:19:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wednesday Open Thread</title><link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/11/wednesday-open-thread-6/#comment-22796030</link><description>hey PBomb - didn't the President allude to that at his speech to the lgbt community a few weeks ago?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least I think that is what he said . . . would have to go search for the speech to confirm but I'm pretty sure he did.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did you read the comments on the Advocate's website?  &lt;a href="http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2009/11/11/DADT_Likely_To_Be_Part_of_Defense_Bill/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2009/11...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just have to shake my head.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Val2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:19:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wednesday Open Thread</title><link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/11/wednesday-open-thread-6/#comment-22770973</link><description>you know the prerogatives Shanti2.  Like the 19 prerogatives disposed on the lawn of womens homes.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.idahostatesman.com/newsupdates/story/966677.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.idahostatesman.com/newsupdates/story...&lt;/a&gt; &amp;lt;snark&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Val2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:38:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wednesday Open Thread</title><link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/11/wednesday-open-thread-6/#comment-22770622</link><description>lololololol Sepia that was my favorite.  raotflmao&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;whoooohoooo too funny!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Val2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:32:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wednesday Open Thread</title><link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/11/wednesday-open-thread-6/#comment-22770555</link><description>WSY - all the more reason for you to consider adding the widgets for the truth-o-meter and the obamameter to your site.  &lt;a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/widget/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/widget/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Val2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:30:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wednesday Open Thread</title><link>http://weeseeyou.com/2009/11/11/wednesday-open-thread-6/#comment-22770379</link><description>or watching programs (Rated R etc) on tv.  My nieces have children and I constantly get on them to not allow the kids to watch the same programming they watch.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, maybe the girl had older siblings and saw things she shouldn't have. . . .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We need to take better care of our kids and protect them more.  Especially when they are so young.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Val2</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:27:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wednesday Open Thread</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/wednesday-open-thread-67/#comment-22770361</link><description>What ever happened to the panel that was supposed to examine this case?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plantsmantx</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:27:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wednesday Open Thread</title><link>http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2009/11/wednesday-open-thread-67/#comment-22769100</link><description>"...and, later on, launched a massive advertising campaign"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, it wasn't exactly "massive", and I used the past tense because I haven't seen any of the ads for a little while, now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Plantsmantx</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:06:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>