<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for m0nty</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/m0nty/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:18:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Green Bay Packers ban Twitter on the job</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/green_bay_packers_ban_twitter_on_the_job/#comment-13812622</link><description>Embracing social media and using it for positive ends would be more progressive than simply banning it, Graffin.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:18:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Possibly the weirdest music video ever created</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/possibly_the_weirdest_music_video_ever_created/#comment-13200221</link><description>I'll have you know, Bill, that we're actually pimply-faced 30-somethings.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:00:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Cadel Evans can&amp;#8217;t win the Tour de France</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/why_cadel_evans_can8217t_win_the_tour_de_france/#comment-12440913</link><description>Ah yes Andrew, I meant Kirchen. Sorry about that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:27:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wanted: one Amstrad CPC6128</title><link>http://duncanriley.disqus.com/wanted_one_amstrad_cpc6128/#comment-12069332</link><description>I had a Commodore 128D. LUXURY</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:20:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The last semi-regular Inquisitr numbers</title><link>http://duncanriley.disqus.com/the_last_semi_regular_inquisitr_numbers/#comment-10646405</link><description>Onya Dunc! Not bored at all! I suppose I could compile it myself from archives, but any chance of a final monthly traffic graph, to give us a visual idea?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My May numbers: 10,999,603 page views on 266,272 absolute uniques. Though weekly is a more accurate metric for me - averaging 2.3M on 85k uniques.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:12:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A question for journalists (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/a_question_for_journalists_scripting_news/#comment-10349909</link><description>I have said I would.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:21:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A question for journalists (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/a_question_for_journalists_scripting_news/#comment-10345348</link><description>But I thought all bloggers were also journalists. Thus you'd have to decline as well, Dave?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 04:21:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google's killer app (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/googles_killer_app_scripting_news/#comment-10249478</link><description>Seems like an issue that deserves more than 140 characters, mate. ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 03:11:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google's killer app (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/googles_killer_app_scripting_news/#comment-10249163</link><description>&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/davewiner/status/1949633351" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/davewiner/status/1949633351&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:43:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google's killer app (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/googles_killer_app_scripting_news/#comment-10249095</link><description>Ah, righto then. I look forward to your review of Wave in a separate post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:36:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google's killer app (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/googles_killer_app_scripting_news/#comment-10248986</link><description>not at all</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:27:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google's killer app (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/googles_killer_app_scripting_news/#comment-10248752</link><description>How does Google Wave fit in with this wishlist?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:07:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In response to Mark Pesce</title><link>http://duncanriley.disqus.com/in_response_to_mark_pesce/#comment-9791926</link><description>I disagree with Mark on several points. Duncan is right about CGT deferment - that seems to me to be a no-brainer move that won't cost the government anything, and VCs definitely take notice of tax avoidance as Dunc says. It encourages continued investment in tech, not just fly-by-night lurks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't think it's true to say that there's not a viable VC culture. The key is that there's not a viable angel culture. And who are the most regular angels? Friends and family, sure, but also previously successful entrepreneurs. It's a virtuous circle that the government could play a role in speeding up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It does grate me, however, when people do get a teensy bit whiny about the handouts given to the likes of the pine plantation industry and demand the same thing. Incentives to invest are one thing, government grants at $900 a pop are something else. I'd prefer more of the former.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 10:21:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 100 Aussie Web Startups - May 09</title><link>http://technationau.disqus.com/top_100_aussie_web_startups_may_09_34/#comment-9719214</link><description>I am surprised that FanFooty does not appear on this list, despite being on the source wiki listing. Its current Alexa ranking is 57,448. Compete seems to not know we exist because we have very little US traffic, maybe that's the problem. I wouldn't take any notice of Compete for sites that don't aim at the US market.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even so, I would have thought a site that does more than 2 million page impressions per week with around 100K uniques would rate a mention.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 04:36:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inquisitr&amp;#8217;s 1st birthday + April stats</title><link>http://duncanriley.disqus.com/inquisitr8217s_1st_birthday_april_stats/#comment-9046846</link><description>Is it true what I hear about your CPMs, that they range from $10-$15? I would kill for anything near that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:20:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Inquisitr Turns One</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/the_inquisitr_turns_one/#comment-9046808</link><description>Gratz Unca Dunc! I can only dream of your CPMs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:17:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Owen Thomas leaves Valleywag for NBC</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/owen_thomas_leaves_valleywag_for_nbc/#comment-8915498</link><description>Nice manboobs!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 23:39:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UStream Redesigns With an Eye Towards Twitter Users</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/ustream_redesigns_with_an_eye_towards_twitter_users/#comment-8664008</link><description>Looks like that was fixed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Bishop</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:23:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UStream Redesigns With an Eye Towards Twitter Users</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/ustream_redesigns_with_an_eye_towards_twitter_users/#comment-8634748</link><description>The new chat sucks balls, if any reply is more than one line the Flash app gets caught on it and doesn't scroll down to show new posts. Fix your Flash crap, Ustream!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:28:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 100 Aussie Web Startups - March 09</title><link>http://technationau.disqus.com/top_100_aussie_web_startups_march_09/#comment-8255751</link><description>I expect to see fanfooty.com.au high up in April.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:25:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sheriff&amp;#8217;s Deputy reinstated after macing rabbit</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/sheriff8217s_deputy_reinstated_after_macing_rabbit/#comment-7701893</link><description>I read this as "macking rabbit". That would have been a whole other set of charges.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:40:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sydney Airport, where fruit is banned, but being beaten to death is OK</title><link>http://duncanriley.disqus.com/sydney_airport_where_fruit_is_banned_but_being_beaten_to_death_is_ok/#comment-7440254</link><description>It was so secure that the bikies were left undisturbed while they killed each other.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:11:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Hypocrisy from Mullenweg and WordPress with new themes jihad</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/more_hypocrisy_from_mullenweg_and_wordpress_with_new_themes_jihad/#comment-7417313</link><description>No man, he can't.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let me put it this way:&lt;br&gt;Let's say you have some open source project. You worked a lot getting it to be world renowned. &lt;br&gt;And you allow users to showcase implementations of your project on YOUR site, but under one decent condition : GPL, because your project is GPL and you love to help the community.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How would you then feel if people were complaining they cannot submit their non-GPL projects? Off of which they maybe even make money? &lt;br&gt;Wouldn't that cross with  your vision, an open source platform? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How would you feel when people are asking you to promote their commercial products based on something you gave for free and even invested in???&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it that hard to understand?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cosmin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:12:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch causes emergency evacuation in UK</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/holy_hand_grenade_of_antioch_causes_emergency_evacuation_in_uk/#comment-7396535</link><description>I like how someone rang up Michael Palin for an official Python comment. Your MSM at work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 06:56:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inquisitr February 2009: and still the ad market bleeds</title><link>http://duncanriley.disqus.com/inquisitr_february_2009_and_still_the_ad_market_bleeds/#comment-6835999</link><description>FanFooty beat you on page views this month. ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">m0nty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 06:59:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>