<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for llimllib</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-23127746" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/llimllib/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:56:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Scott's Blarney :: 091024a.html</title><link>http://scott.wiersdorf.org/blarney/091024a.html#comment-20983695</link><description>I am 100% anti-vaccine fear mongering, and that is not what this is, so let's start by dispensing with the name-calling.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To make my biases plain, I am not the author, I am the opposite of scared of needles, and I am related to several traditional health professionals. Traditional vaccination fear-mongering (mercury, etc.) makes me extremely angry. Fucking pertussis is coming back because of those assholes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What the author is doing here is positing that the 86% number you're giving is not worthwhile due to two factors. First, the overall incidence of the flu does not decrease even when people are successfully immunized from one particular strain of virus. Second, that cohort bias makes that number untrustworthy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have not read any of the studies he points to, so I'll only update my probabilities a bit before I do, but it's worth considering whether this particular line of reasoning is valid without lumping it into general anti-vaccination fear mongering.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:56:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brian Sloane &amp;mdash; asciirun:
PhotoSketch: “We present a system that...</title><link>http://briansloane.com/post/205579765/asciirun-photosketch-we-present-a-system-that?ref=nf#comment-19104321</link><description>I was inspired by this to go download the &lt;a href="http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/67890/siggraph04-grabcut.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;original paper&lt;/a&gt; about the GrabCut algorithm; I may try to implement it for fun.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:24:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SIGUSR2 
 &amp;gt; Python Worlds</title><link>http://sigusr2.net/2009/Oct/01/python-worlds.html#comment-18068694</link><description>I'm pretty sure that all this dodgy with-hacking indicates a real need for a new language construct.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's not an insult, by the way, super neat hack.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:49:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rodeo dog - Today I learned a new vocab word, guilloché, and...</title><link>http://rodeodog.tumblr.com/post/99026163#comment-17377062</link><description>There's a fun guilloche toy here: &lt;a href="http://www.subblue.com/projects/guilloche" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.subblue.com/projects/guilloche&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:45:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canvas Tutorial - The Mouse</title><link>http://billmill.org/static/canvastutorial/mouse.html#comment-14570513</link><description>I think I'd rather keep all the logic in the draw() function. In fact, if I went back and did it again, I'd probably just save the mouse's x position in the onMouseMove function and move the paddle in the draw() function, instead of in the onMouseMove function like I've done.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's mainly an aesthetic decision.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:58:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canvas Tutorial - Library: an Interlude</title><link>http://billmill.org/static/canvastutorial/library.html#comment-13843025</link><description>Yeah... I don't know how I missed that? I looked at my code today when you first commented and moving those into the init function was immediately obvious. Will fix.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:51:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canvas Tutorial - Bounce</title><link>http://billmill.org/static/canvastutorial/bounce.html#comment-12409676</link><description>Check the code in Finishing Touches :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:33:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kamikaze Marketing</title><link>http://lmframework.com/blog/2009/07/kamikaze-marketing/#comment-12164705</link><description>nit: replace "principal" with "principle".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:44:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canvas Tutorial - Library: an Interlude</title><link>http://billmill.org/static/canvastutorial/library.html#comment-10222309</link><description>On what browser? You mean the $("#canvas").width() and $("#canvas").height() calls return undefined?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:16:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook's latest raise to cash out employees is disgusting</title><link>http://www.thisisgoingtobebig.com/2009/05/facebooks-latest-raise-to-cash-out-employees-is-disgusting.html#comment-9466559</link><description>I agree with your general thesis - it's silly for Facebook to raise cash to hand out to these developers (if indeed that's what they're doing), but I think your article makes its claim in histrionic fashion with irrelevant statements.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; Tell that to some family who ran their local Chevy dealer for the last 20 years who just got news this week that they're getting the ax.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is a totally irrelevant statement designed to appeal to emotions instead of reason. My father-in-law and his father have run a Chevy dealership for the last 70 years, and were closed this week; if you want to discuss that situation and why it's different, that's fine, but I believe that if you think about it honestly you'll see why for yourself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; I'm sorry, but this is exactly what's wrong with this country and why we got here in this economic mess--people looking for a handout before actually creating any real value.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, no, not in any proximal sense at least. This is another statement designed to elicit a "yeah, you tell 'em!" that doesn't actually make sense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I'd like you to do to prove me wrong is to give me a theory of how "people looking for a handout before actually creating any real value" are the (exact!) root cause of the US's economic troubles. I don't think you can do it without stretching the phrase to meaninglessness.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My opinion? Facebook sold shares of its company to investors who bought them of their own free will, and it wants to reward some of its employees. It makes *me* not want to invest in a company that will do so without making some cash first, but I don't see a reason to get all hysterical about it and try to blame the economic collapse on this type of behavior.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's this type of shoddy, emotional thinking that makes the *actual* problems of our economy much harder to discuss.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 01:55:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There are many like it But this one is mine. - When they finally arrived at Aqaba, Lawrence’s...</title><link>http://journal.billmill.org/post/103758975#comment-9018723</link><description>fact.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:34:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There are many like it But this one is mine. - When they finally arrived at Aqaba, Lawrence’s...</title><link>http://journal.billmill.org/post/103758975#comment-9016177</link><description>Although I agree with you about his overall point, I think he definitely pushes the basketball thing too far. His primary example is of *12-year old girls*. OF COURSE 12-year old girls can't beat a super-hard press. And his opponents absolutely are correct when they say that the game should be (at least somewhat) about learning skills at that age - not about winning at all costs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What *really* gets my goat about the article, though, is that he doesn't talk about the risk/reward tradeoff that occurs when you try a radical David strategy, or the idea that equilibria exists.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First off, playing as a David is an extremely risky proposition - basically you gain a shot at winning in exchange for a large chance of getting killed. Gladwell doesn't mention this at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, not everything is a war or a zero-sum game! Basketball is, but business isn't. Playing as a David in the business world often means you'll give up opportunities to establish a positive equilibria. Lowe's co-exists with Home Depot - they didn't need to kill the giant, they established a competitive but mutually beneficial arrangement. When you try a David strategy, you explicitly attack your enemy and run the risk of killing *both* your businesses.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I might blog about this, I definitely have things to say about this article.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 12:12:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: There are many like it But this one is mine. - At many blogs (Sullivan, Yglesias, DeLong, among...</title><link>http://journal.billmill.org/post/100891636#comment-8774545</link><description>It's just hard for me to swallow the idea of living in a country that's not governed by the rule of law, and feels like we have a chance to tray and make a stand on it right now. If we don't prosecute people who knowingly ordered torture, what hope is there for ever regaining the rule of law? Should I just concede that we live in a country whose politicians are above the law?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:05:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canvas Tutorial - Introduction</title><link>http://billmill.org/static/canvastutorial/#comment-8729056</link><description>Others have suggested it, and I remain unopposed to using explorercanvas. However, I do not have Windows, and so cannot test it, so I don't want to post it up here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you'd like to modify these pages and test them with explorercanvas for me, I'd welcome the work - you can check it all out at &lt;a href="http://github.com/llimllib/refresh-canvas/tree/6300e480dacf025391c14449618a01e7661c2841/tutorial" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://github.com/llimllib/refresh-canvas/tree/...&lt;/a&gt; .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:18:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canvas Tutorial - Draw a Circle</title><link>http://billmill.org/static/canvastutorial/ball.html#comment-8421295</link><description>What browser are you using? The error means that $('#canvas') is returning null, so that the index [0] doesn't exist.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:35:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pycon: Unladen-Swallow</title><link>http://jessenoller.com/2009/03/26/pycon-unladen-swallow/#comment-7532903</link><description>They say on that page that the times are calculated as (new-old)/new, so (.409 - 1.023) / .409 = -1.5 -&amp;gt; 150%&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that this is silly; .409 is 2.5 times faster than 1.023, not 1.5 times.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:56:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shooting with the oppposite eye</title><link>http://scottwyden.com/shooting-with-the-oppposite-eye/#comment-12200858</link><description>My left eye is only half as good as my right one, so my nice zuiko lens would look like a holga all of a sudden... I'll have to try it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:29:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shooting with the oppposite eye</title><link>http://www.scottwyden.com/blog/shooting-with-the-oppposite-eye/#comment-10587528</link><description>My left eye is only half as good as my right one, so my nice zuiko lens would look like a holga all of a sudden... I'll have to try it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:29:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canvas Tutorial - Introduction</title><link>http://billmill.org/static/canvastutorial/#comment-6538983</link><description>I alerted the disqus guys to the fact that canvastutorial/ and canvastutorial/index.html display different comments, and didn't receive any reply.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll look at the contents-off-the-screen issue, that is annoying too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thanks for the reports.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:09:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Git Workflow</title><link>http://gweezlebur.com/2009/01/19/my-git-workflow.html#comment-5393825</link><description>I actually didn't even notice that you used that too :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:04:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Git Workflow</title><link>http://gweezlebur.com/2009/01/19/my-git-workflow.html#comment-5393623</link><description>My workflow has one difference: I hate stash. It feels too "magic" for me; I'll use it if I expect to have a change stashed for no longer than 5 minutes, but not otherwise, because it hides the change too well and I've forgotten them several times, with painful results.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Instead, even when I'm working on my solo github projects, I'll work in branches (why work on master? It's so easy to branch). Then, if I need to work on a bug, I'll just git commit -a -m "stash" on the topic branch I'm working on, git co master &amp;&amp; git co -b &amp;lt;bug-fix-branch&amp;gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I want to merge the topic branch back into master, I use "git merge --squash &amp;lt;topic-branch&amp;gt;" so that I can write a good commit message and nobody sees my "stash"es.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:56:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Git Workflow</title><link>http://gweezlebur.com/2009/01/19/my-git-workflow.html#comment-5393401</link><description>&amp;gt; that SSP workflow looks daunting&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Really, all the stuff after "run the tests" is usually really quick. In my head it's only 3 conceptual steps:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) make sure master is up to date: git co master &amp;&amp; git pull&lt;br&gt;2) make sure our changes don't conflict with what happened in master since I checked out: git co &amp;lt;topic-branch&amp;gt; &amp;&amp; git rebase master&lt;br&gt;3) merge our changes in: git co master &amp;&amp; git merge &amp;lt;topic-branch&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only way it becomes a problem is if you let your topic branch go too long without rebasing - then step 2 can be painful as you have to decide whether or not to merge each change, or use a merge strategy, etc etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(edit: I use git aliases so that git co == git checkout; see &lt;a href="http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/Aliases" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/Aliases&lt;/a&gt; )</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:43:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: between scylla and charybdis - Anyone else up for a walk through Greenmount West...</title><link>http://boyghost.tumblr.com/post/71419850#comment-5384217</link><description>I am. This weekend? (I'm llimllib on flickr too or &lt;a href="mailto:bill.mill@gmail.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;bill.mill@gmail.com&lt;/a&gt;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:52:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canvas Tutorial - Coda</title><link>http://billmill.org/static/canvastutorial/coda.html#comment-4959894</link><description>rahul, I would change the condition of the onMouseMove function from:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  if (evt.pageX &amp;gt; canvasMinX &amp;&amp; evt.pageX &amp;lt; canvasMaxX) {&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;to:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  if (evt.pageX &amp;gt; canvasMinX &amp;&amp; evt.pageX &amp;lt; canvasMaxX &amp;&amp;&lt;br&gt;     evt.pageY &amp;gt; canvasTop &amp;&amp; evt.pageY &amp;lt; canvasTop + HEIGHT) {&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;where canvasTop was initialized to 0 in the variables list at the top of the library, and set to its final value by a line like this in init():&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  canvasTop = $("#canvas").offset().top;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:57:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The question is wrong</title><link>http://paulbuchheit.blogspot.com/2009/01/question-is-wrong.html#comment-4871402</link><description>Paul,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That was my comment on the post where he *asked* the question, not where he answered it:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001203.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/00120...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;unfortunately, there's no permalinks on the comments there - grep for "bill mill".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">llimllib</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:12:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>