<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for linmar</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/linmar/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/linmar/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:33:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Contact</title><link>http://linke.de/contact/#comment-143493942</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hallo etc,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;danke fuer die Info.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Falls Ihnen ein Fehler aufgefallen ist, sagen Sie mir doch bitte auch wo und ich werde es umgehend korrigieren.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ansonsten sollte man (wenn man schon ohne konkret zu werden noergelt) sich doch wenigstens trauen, seinen Namen anzugeben, oder?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 11:33:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Work in progress</title><link>http://photography.linke.de/2010/11/work-in-progress/#comment-109756835</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Due to other priorities the move it's still not complete. Mind the gap :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:55:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to create a Sekonic L-758DR profile?</title><link>http://linke.de/2008/12/how-to-create-a-sekonic-l-758dr-profile/#comment-86364169</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently I bought the wrong profiling target, but I refuse to spend more money on this. In the end I believe (now, not when I bought the light meter!) that it does not really make any difference if you profile your camera or not. I'm still very happy with the light meter by itself, without profiling. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:21:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ok here is a fourth test posting</title><link>http://weddingphoto-ml.com/2010/09/ok-here-is-a-fourth-test-posting/#comment-84425408</link><description>&lt;p&gt;another one&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:50:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ok here is a fourth test posting</title><link>http://weddingphoto-ml.com/2010/09/ok-here-is-a-fourth-test-posting/#comment-84425316</link><description>&lt;p&gt;a comment&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:50:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Learning Murex</title><link>http://murexusers.org/2008/08/learning-murex/#comment-77787912</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Guys, as you might know there is a copyright on Murex-documentation, therefore it's not allowed to distribute any documentation authored by Murex. Keep that in mind please.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:46:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My HDR Tutorial</title><link>http://linke.de/2009/01/my-hdr-tutorial/#comment-45524290</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I usually set the black/white point and crop. Sometimes I do minor curve adjustments. When doing pseudo-HDR I create several JPGs out of one RAW file and continue processing in Photomatix.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:07:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TeeCee on &amp;quot;Murex Tutorials&amp;quot;</title><link>http://murexusers.org/2010/02/teecee-on-murex-tutorials/#comment-37433587</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it's better to send your questions to murex-l@listserv.linke.de - however, there are no intro-documents on Murex. Just the online help ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 03:00:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On retouching</title><link>http://photography.linke.de/2010/02/on-retouching/#comment-35808375</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Michael, actually I was suprised too, that “the professionals” spend more time on this than I did. However, this is because of different techniques being used. Even though I didn’t blur the image, my approach did loose some detail in the skin. If one does it properly, just like Matt did, this indeed just takes more time. @All, If anybody is interested I could post the original RAW file and you could submit your versions if you like. Please let me know.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS: I’m not a big fan of SEO postings or sales rethoric in my blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:17:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On retouching</title><link>http://photography.linke.de/2010/02/on-retouching/#comment-35635042</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've uploaded the results of the two plugins: portraiture and portrait professional&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:25:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spezialeinheit «Skorpion» rückt nach Streit an die Weststrasse aus</title><link>http://photography.linke.de/2010/02/18/grossaufgebot-der-polizei-in-zuerich-weststrasse-3-verhaftungen/#comment-35001846</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/zuerich/stadt/Spezialeinheit-Skorpion-verhaftete-vier-Maenner-und-eine-Frau/story/25830665" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/zuerich/stadt/Spezialeinheit-Skorpion-verhaftete-vier-Maenner-und-eine-Frau/story/25830665"&gt;http://www.tagesanzeiger.ch...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:11:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On retouching</title><link>http://photography.linke.de/2010/02/on-retouching/#comment-34667412</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are right; I've started adding the 100% views (zoomify), but will need to upload Matt's version again as the current uploads of his version are in the wrong colorspace; I'll also add the Plug-In Samples tonight.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: velmurugan on &amp;quot;Murex Tutorials&amp;quot;</title><link>http://murexusers.org/2009/12/velmurugan-on-murex-tutorials/#comment-27532959</link><description>&lt;p&gt;there are no Murex tutorials, but you can press F1 for a (by now very good) online-help or join MTEK for trainings.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:02:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: High performance &amp;#8230; delivered &amp;#8230;</title><link>http://linke.de/2009/03/high-performance-delivered/#comment-25942893</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well ... of course one could think of situations were even the above might work, but the business-side of my blog is focussed on the financial services industry and these scripts are usually implemented in areas, where it is criticial for the client that they work 100% reliable at all times. I have no problem at all with someone who does not know how to write a script (well) and am more than happy to help, but after some research on that person's side I would have expected an "oops, sorry, I was wrong and fixed it now" rather than saying that everybody else is wrong. It's that kind of attitude I am troubled with. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:50:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sonex Onex Overshadowed by R&amp;amp;D Stars</title><link>http://www.rent-a-plane.com/2009/09/10/sonex-onex-overshadowed-by-rd-stars/#comment-25843019</link><description>&lt;p&gt;could you please try again? thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:47:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Automatically adding exif information to a description</title><link>http://linke.de/2009/01/automatically-adding-exif-information-to-a-description/#comment-17837763</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For myself I'm not using this script anymore, instead I switched to Photomechanic, which offers those template based descriptions but also a lot of photo management features ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:35:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My new color managed workflow</title><link>http://linke.de/2009/09/my-new-color-managed-workflow/#comment-17214875</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's another interesting link about why one would want to profile the monitor:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/ARTS/MONCAL/CALIBRATE.HTM" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.imaging-resource.com/ARTS/MONCAL/CALIBRATE.HTM"&gt;http://www.imaging-resource...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:26:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nikon D3x review</title><link>http://linke.de/2009/05/nikon-d3x-review/#comment-13804840</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've rented it again and like it more and more :) Together with the Nikkor 200-400/f4 it's a really cool combination :) The idea with the Katzeye was a waste of money, it does show the 5:4 marks, but it's not the same and requires post processing, while the D3x pictures only require very minor tweaks in capture one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 05:56:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My HDR Tutorial</title><link>http://linke.de/2009/01/my-hdr-tutorial/#comment-11524923</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Update: I switched from Noise Ninja to Nik Dfine 2.0 to reduce noise. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:33:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hewlett Packard &amp;#8211; HP&amp;#039;s worst service EVER</title><link>http://linke.de/2009/02/hewlett-packard-hps-worst-service-ever/#comment-10883687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Update 20090614: The same problem occured again, by now I switched to Apple and am not sure if I will have it repaired again or not. For sure that was my last HP notebook I ever bought.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:36:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nikon D3x review</title><link>http://linke.de/2009/05/nikon-d3x-review/#comment-9200114</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Katz Eye is due to arrive today :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 06:46:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My HDR Tutorial</title><link>http://linke.de/2009/01/my-hdr-tutorial/#comment-9120311</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had looked at Topaz when I was still thinking if I should buy LucisArt or not (heavy pricetag). Personally I didn't like it too much, but maybe I just didn't spend enough time learning how to use it. However, I'm glad I picked LucisArt in the end ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 02:25:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nikon GP-1 review: useless</title><link>http://linke.de/2009/03/nikon-gp-1-review-useless/#comment-8722021</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would like to reword the original review; it is not useless. Actually if you are out in the wild it is working ok. However, I find that the GPS receiver is much worse than the one in my iPhone, i.e. the iPhone knew quite exactly where I've been while the camera only had a correct position in 20% of the tries. What I really dislike is the extra cable. Nikon should have found a way to transmit data betweenn the flash shoe and the camera without requireing another cable. Bottom line: it's ok but I would not buy it again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:37:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hewlett Packard &amp;#8211; HP&amp;#039;s worst service EVER</title><link>http://linke.de/2009/02/hewlett-packard-hps-worst-service-ever/#comment-8679615</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Case closed; the Swiss HP service finally fixed the problem ... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:30:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RCN New York</title><link>http://www.linke.de/2008/03/09/rcn-new-york-2/#comment-7791749</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the latest from Zuerich using Cablecom ... cablecom rocks!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Markus Linke</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:14:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>