<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for leolaporte</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/leolaporte/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:30:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Props to Leo Laporte</title><link>http://jeffharbertblog.disqus.com/props_to_leo_laporte/#comment-20991321</link><description>My pleasure, Leo!  I think you're probably right about 90% of Twitter uses not know what we're talking about. Here's to being a power user.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jharbert</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:30:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Props to Leo Laporte</title><link>http://jeffharbertblog.disqus.com/props_to_leo_laporte/#comment-20987710</link><description>Thanks, Jeff! Truth is, I only just figured out Twitter's arcane reply rules (@dane clued me in when I sent him a congratulations on 15 years in business and only our mutual followers saw it). I try, these days, to put the @ name in a subordinate clause except when I really want to limit my answer to only our mutual followers. I bet 90% of Twitter users have no idea what we're talking about!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:15:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogworld And New Media Expo Report</title><link>http://paulcolligansblog.disqus.com/blogworld_and_new_media_expo_report/#comment-20325969</link><description>Your commitment to the industry speaks loudly.  I hope others follow suit.  Thank you Leo.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">twitter-511283</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:27:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogworld And New Media Expo Report</title><link>http://paulcolligansblog.disqus.com/blogworld_and_new_media_expo_report/#comment-20325903</link><description>Right on Paul. It's still a small - and perhaps even struggling - show, but it's OUR show and we need to help make it happen. See you next year, TWiTs in tow.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:24:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leo&amp;#8217;s Twitter Updates for 2008-05-17</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/leo8217s_twitter_updates_for_2008_05_17/#comment-9933683</link><description>It's Wolfram Alpha - &lt;a href="http://wolframalpha.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://wolframalpha.com&lt;/a&gt; - enjoy and thanks for listening!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 14:33:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Roz Is OFF!</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/roz_is_off/#comment-9929893</link><description>I'm having some difficulty with Disqus moderation. If you posted a comment and it's still not appearing here, my apologies. I'll approve them as soon as Disqus starts working again.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 11:28:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leo&amp;#8217;s Twitter Updates for 2008-05-25</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/leo8217s_twitter_updates_for_2008_05_25/#comment-9929870</link><description>And here we are, one year later, and Roz has just sailed again!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 11:26:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TWiT Army Laconica Plugin</title><link>http://kylehasegawa.disqus.com/twit_army_laconica_plugin/#comment-7697927</link><description>Brilliant! Thanks Kyle!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:55:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New mixer</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/new_mixer/#comment-7461222</link><description>The Telos Axia is still in the works. We'll probably install it in May or June.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:03:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Skypesaurus Story</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/the_skypesaurus_story/#comment-7281365</link><description>Cheers that explains why.  Quick follow-up question:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't any electricity companies offer 100% green electricity there?  You wouldn't have to install solar, you'd just source your electricity from a "100% green" supply source.  It may even be the incumbent, but at a slightly higher price.  Eg here it is around $4-$7 per week extra (domestic, tho business is also available) for govt accredited 100% "greenpower", and ALL providers offer it.  The retailer simply buys that portion wholesale from a green source eg wind farm, and its govt controlled and audited so they can't pull a shonky.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers and thanx for taking time to reply Leo.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">peterh_oz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:44:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Skypesaurus Story</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/the_skypesaurus_story/#comment-7275149</link><description>OK thanks Leo. I have seen Skypesaurus in action and I am impressed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">scanmikey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:46:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Skypesaurus Story</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/the_skypesaurus_story/#comment-7274956</link><description>We have a ton of bandwidth. Currently the Skypesaurus runs on our Comcast business class cable with 4Mbits up and 30 down. It's working fine, but we've ordered &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_in_the_First_Mile" rel="nofollow"&gt;IEEE 802.3ah&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href="http://Sonic.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;Sonic.net&lt;/a&gt; which will give us a symmetric 10Mbps (or possibly 12mbits because we're two blocks from the CO). We'll use that for Skypesaurus starting tomorrow or the next day. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We also have a T1 for video streaming, a business class DSL line for another Skype box (which we use for the single host shows), and ISDN for the radio show. We spend $1200/month for bandwidth and need it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:36:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Skypesaurus Story</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/the_skypesaurus_story/#comment-7274829</link><description>That's what we bought - so it must work! We did buy some cheaper RAM and had a problem. Hence the Corsair.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:29:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Skypesaurus Story</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/the_skypesaurus_story/#comment-7274785</link><description>We're not green, alas. But we have endeavoured to stick with low power solutions when possible. The Mini-ITX case is very low power. Our entire lighting grid uses only 250-watts. Nevertheless, we do use a lot of power to do what we do. I'd love to go all solar, but since we rent the studio I don't think that's likely. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Ebox is a good looking solution - Colleen may not have know about them. Our Atoms were cheap, and had s-video out, which was a key part of the solution. They also offer optical audio out which we'll be using soon. We are planning to add DC power bricks to them to eliminate fan noise. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Virtual machines won't work. You need four discrete audio and video channels - that means four hardware boxes. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wanted to make sure we had the latest version of Skype to work with. The Linux versions seem to lag the Windows versions. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for watching!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:27:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Skypesaurus Story</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/the_skypesaurus_story/#comment-7274702</link><description>Colleen, of course.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:23:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_6386/#comment-7235958</link><description>Based on the posts from Dave, I figured you were using a Laconica install. I think the "follow" concept within a community would be pointless as everyone is mostly there for the same reason. If the install becomes simple enough it could be a very powerful community builder for smaller blogs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">robdiana</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:22:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/03/can-microblogging-power-blog-community.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_6386/#comment-7235492</link><description>This is an experiment we tried some time ago at TWiT and it's been a rousing success. A microblog focused around a community is a very different experience from the hurly burly of Twitter, and more satisfying in many ways. One also tends to use a small microblog differently - the public stream, for instance, is much more useful. I don't even follow anyone; I just read the public stream. We used Laconica for the TWiT Army install and it's working very nicely. &lt;a href="http://army.twit.tv" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://army.twit.tv&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:33:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: tumbléo</title><link>http://tumbleo.disqus.com/tumbleo_79/#comment-6093915</link><description>It was a follow-up tweet to a story I did about the mainstreaming of Twitter with Bill Handel on KFI. It's newsworthy - just as the link to celebrities who tweet was - one doesn't have to follow the link.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:45:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7: Snap!</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/windows_7_snap/#comment-5742369</link><description>It's around 3GB - but get it soon. They say no more downloads after Feb 10.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:24:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7: Snap!</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/windows_7_snap/#comment-5703824</link><description>Thanks! Wonder how this is different from the no sandbox switch.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:06:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7: Snap!</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/windows_7_snap/#comment-5703790</link><description>Works! Thanks. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Looks like I'll have to add this to all my saved application shortcuts, too. Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:04:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Connected</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/facebook_connected/#comment-5165058</link><description>Not sure what the deal is but the RSS is still not full text.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fpettit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:13:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Connected</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/facebook_connected/#comment-5106091</link><description>I had no idea it was turned off. Must have reset itself somewhere. Or I never noticed it. I'm off to fix it right now. I hate excerpts in RSS!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just checked and it's been on full text all along.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:11:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Hacked</title><link>http://leolaporte.disqus.com/twitter_hacked/#comment-4932654</link><description>I really appreciated your openess, John. It's good to know what actually happened. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The full conversation is on Qik: &lt;a href="http://qik.com/twit#v=813128" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://qik.com/twit#v=813128&lt;/a&gt; (along with other videos of the revelry last night) Our conversation begins about 3 minutes in at the 10:00 mark. It was good meeting you too - sorry about the camera work!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:01:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HowTo: The Macintosh will be 25 on 1/24/09</title><link>http://howto.disqus.com/howto_the_macintosh_will_be_25_on_12409_38/#comment-4881529</link><description>I became a computer buff in the late 70s, first with Atari, then C/PM machines. I bought one of the first IBM-PC clones, an Eagle PC, in '83. I remember seeing the Lisa around that time and wanting one very badly, but at $10,000 they were way beyond the means of a midday DJ at KLOK-AM in San Jose (aka me). When the Macintosh came out I was really excited but it was still pretty expensive. It took me two months of yearning before I could bring myself to go into the San Francisco Macy's, plunk down my Macy's credit card, and spend $2,500 on my first Mac. It probably took me several years to pay off that Mac, but I never looked back. Which is funny, because that first 128K Mac was a real pain to use. I still remember the several hundred disk swaps it would take to copy a single floppy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leolaporte</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 13:49:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>