<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for leigh</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/leigh/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:51:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Harry Rosen's Blog &amp;amp; Understanding the Dynamics of &lt;s&gt;Slow&lt;/s&gt; Social Media</title><link>http://leighhimel.disqus.com/harry_rosens_blog_amp_understanding_the_dynamics_of_sslows_social_media/#comment-22252682</link><description>The course that I designed &amp; am helping launch is about social media.  You are certainly qualified.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Agree about Matt.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe that is where I am wrong.  I do expect the Globe to act in the interest of Canadian business.  Wow.  I can not believe that I still feel this trust with that brand.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Cayley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:51:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Harry Rosen's Blog &amp;amp; Understanding the Dynamics of &lt;s&gt;Slow&lt;/s&gt; Social Media</title><link>http://leighhimel.disqus.com/harry_rosens_blog_amp_understanding_the_dynamics_of_sslows_social_media/#comment-22245087</link><description>Hi Michael - &lt;br&gt;Thanks.  I'll check out your ning group but would have no idea if i would qualify as a PR mentor.  Everything is connected to everything else, but I rarely create PR like things, I more comment and enhance the ones real professionals work on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the G&amp;M - I think they positioned the story as a fail bc the Director of Marketing told them it was.  With a few exceptions (my friend Mathew Iingram being one of them) , I haven't exactly seen people within the newspaper industry embracing or understanding Social Media in any way that is meaningful.  Therefore, I would hardly expect anything different from their reporting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:57:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Harry Rosen's Blog &amp;amp; Understanding the Dynamics of &lt;s&gt;Slow&lt;/s&gt; Social Media</title><link>http://leighhimel.disqus.com/harry_rosens_blog_amp_understanding_the_dynamics_of_sslows_social_media/#comment-22049063</link><description>lol.  I do they think they tried to crate the relationship but I fixed the spelling error anyhow :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:33:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Cohort Analysis</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/the_cohort_analysis/#comment-19291313</link><description>Great content in Dave's presentation with a lot of learning that large brands can utilize as well (on my to do list to write a presentation of lessons Corporations can learn from start ups).  But man, he needs to get some SERIOUS powerpoint creative help (Dave please - no more colour coding your content!  :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 06:31:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Six Pixels and Mitch&amp;#8217;s Big Day</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/six_pixels_and_mitch8217s_big_day/#comment-16185968</link><description>I'm buying ten books.  Oh wait.  I work at Twist Image.  I guess it doesn't count.   But for the record i woulda anyway  :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:10:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What We Can Learn From Mess</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/what_we_can_learn_from_mess/#comment-15469613</link><description>They have passionate users.  Have reinvented the classifieds market place.  Are kicking their competitions asses.  Have little overhead.  AND apparently love going to their jobs every day.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Um yeah.  If that's a mess?  Bring it on!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:59:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I'm Just Not That Into You!</title><link>http://leighhimel.disqus.com/im_just_not_that_into_you/#comment-13556314</link><description>I'm glad that you finally see it my way :p</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dondy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:12:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I'm Just Not That Into You!</title><link>http://leighhimel.disqus.com/im_just_not_that_into_you/#comment-13555588</link><description>lol.  Yes my thunderous wrath! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Look Dondy, I"m not disagreeing with you about authenticity, about value exchange - i just think that your using the term relationship so broadly that it's hard for me to disagree.  Creating brilliant customer experiences is what i believe we all collectively try to do and sometimes over time if we earn the right, maybe the word relationship is relevant.  :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:53:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I'm Just Not That Into You!</title><link>http://leighhimel.disqus.com/im_just_not_that_into_you/#comment-13547478</link><description>Leigh I value your opinion and also fear your wrath ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, isn't marketing about creating relationships with your consumers? And I think Mark touched on this a little bit. Authenticity is becoming more and more important in advertising and I think its because of social media's loud mouth! The days of trick clicks and underhanded advertising will soon lose its value.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you're a digital marketer and think that you can get all the information/ROI you need/want from your consumers without establishing a good relationship first, then you're right! You are not doing your client any service.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe we should start at "Dating Marketing" first!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dondy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:29:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I'm Just Not That Into You!</title><link>http://leighhimel.disqus.com/im_just_not_that_into_you/#comment-13492504</link><description>The CEO of one of my participant organizations (a direct marketing and ad agency in New York), talks about the traditional little-r big-M relationship Marketing, as in, the focus is on the Marketing - relationship is a euphemism. She has been thinking about turning that around, creating the concept of big-R little-m Relationship marketing, with a focus on creating authentic relationship with consumers. It is a lot more than talking at them through social media. They have been experimenting with first re-creating their own staff in the role of authentic consumers (for one of their pharma clients) to gain a true appreciation of what end consumers experience. The issue of what "relationship" means when you're essentially trying to manipulate someone to donate their attention and spend their money is a complex one (and why they were interested in my work in the first place). But it certainly is not easy. The other one with which they're wrestling is "trust."  That's also turning out to be quite a bear.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Federman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:07:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I'm Just Not That Into You!</title><link>http://leighhimel.disqus.com/im_just_not_that_into_you/#comment-13486590</link><description>lol thank you!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:29:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I'm Just Not That Into You!</title><link>http://leighhimel.disqus.com/im_just_not_that_into_you/#comment-13486376</link><description>Dondy totally disagree with you.   We may think or say that but we are completely full of crap then.   I bet direct marketers thought their great letters they used to mail were all about relationships too - thus the name 'relationship marketing' &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Relationship with my tampon brand of choice?  Or my favorite chewing gum?  I don't think so.  And if that's what digital marketers are telling themselves, i don't think they are doing themselves or their clients any service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:22:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I'm Just Not That Into You!</title><link>http://leighhimel.disqus.com/im_just_not_that_into_you/#comment-13484028</link><description>It's not relationships and its not community? Really!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think we are just getting into semantics here but most kind of marketing communications, specially online, is trying to establish a relationship. May it be a bad one it is still at the core trying to relate or at least start one. And when it comes to campaigns, most of the time we rely on the community to share and spread it around. To top that we even use the quantity and quality of the community as a measure of success!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I respectfully disagree with that :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dondy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:07:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I'm Just Not That Into You!</title><link>http://leighhimel.disqus.com/im_just_not_that_into_you/#comment-13482054</link><description>Notice that i did say community engagement and not social media in general (although since all media is becoming social i'm never sure what that means).  I agree that you can use many tactics to do a campaign depending upon what you are trying to achieve but that's not relationship and that's not community.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:10:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Bitter Sweet Sale Of Oponia</title><link>http://leighhimel.disqus.com/the_bitter_sweet_sale_of_oponia/#comment-11929818</link><description>thanks Mark. Onward and upward i guess!  &lt;br&gt; :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:33:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Drives Consumer Adoption Of New Technologies?</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/what_drives_consumer_adoption_of_new_technologies/#comment-10795032</link><description>great comment Steve - I've just added it to my 'one great thought per slide' insights repository</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:31:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If The Message Is Important, It Will Find Me</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/if_the_message_is_important_it_will_find_me/#comment-10313611</link><description>I totally do this on my vm@work.  There are so many sales pple and others looking for 'coffee' chats to network etc. these days.  I'm so crazy busy at work (i know i shouldn't complain considering but there are days.....) that i don't have time to write down a phone number or email address.  I just figure, if it really matters (to me and/or to them) they'll call back, figure out my email addy, find someone who knows me to introduce them or whatever.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The one thing i can say that if they are persistent and the message finds me more than a couple times, I try to make the time to hear their schpeil.  :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 07:41:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: omg You're Like Such A Loser:  Comeptition &amp;amp; Curating Your Community</title><link>http://leighhimel.disqus.com/omg_youre_like_such_a_loser_comeptition_amp_curating_your_community/#comment-10302594</link><description>Love this quote dave "One of the great skills in business is to learn how to grow without ripping up the roots and replanting the business."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll have to use that one sometime.  :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:57:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: omg You're Like Such A Loser:  Comeptition &amp;amp; Curating Your Community</title><link>http://leighhimel.disqus.com/omg_youre_like_such_a_loser_comeptition_amp_curating_your_community/#comment-10292603</link><description>I'm curious if they will keep it as well.  Maybe the Tumblr community I'm connected with is an anomaly for their service?  I got the impression that their original intent was to use Tumblr as a collection place for all your other services - lots of people use it with their other feeds - that's just not how i use it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 10:28:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Network Is My Teacher</title><link>http://leighhimel.disqus.com/the_network_is_my_teacher/#comment-9856888</link><description>HI Clare,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the link.  I would be interested so please come back when the book is avail for purchase :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 11:33:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introducing your new Activity page (and... | Tumblr Staff</title><link>http://tumblrstaff.disqus.com/introducing_your_new_activity_page_and_tumblr_staff/#comment-9112083</link><description>Trying not to be cynical but it feels a bit like a marketing ploy than anything else (how to get people to use your service more?  Make 'em compete!)  However, that being said, i like the fact that it creates visibility to tumblr logs that i haven't seen.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe less focus on competition and more focus on making great tumblr logs and content visible?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:24:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cluetrainplus 10:  Thesis #95</title><link>http://leighhimel.disqus.com/cluetrainplus_10_thesis_95/#comment-8813387</link><description>My pleasure Robbie. Great photo.  :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:44:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogrollr Two Months Later - My Top Ten</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/blogrollr_two_months_later_my_top_ten/#comment-8779905</link><description>Thanks. She's got talent for sure</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:00:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogrollr Two Months Later - My Top Ten</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/blogrollr_two_months_later_my_top_ten/#comment-8778817</link><description>She definitely does!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Butch Decossas</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Butch Decossas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:29:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogrollr Two Months Later - My Top Ten</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/blogrollr_two_months_later_my_top_ten/#comment-8774558</link><description>Jessica's got an amazing eye for portrait photography.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">leigh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:05:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>