<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for kylelong100</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/kylelong100/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:10:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Technical Analysis, What it is and What it is Not</title><link>http://zacharybass.disqus.com/technical_analysis_what_it_is_and_what_it_is_not_30/#comment-917334</link><description>Dear zach,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;could you summarize how the philosophy in art of war applies to exploiting the seams.  the outlines of the book appears hard to understand and has a lot of military formations that I do not want to read as of this time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kylelong100</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:10:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Price Manipulation, but Who and Why?</title><link>http://zacharybass.disqus.com/apple_price_manipulation_but_who_and_why/#comment-917083</link><description>i really like win's explanation why aapl did not go up as much today: because of lack of short covering.   I did cover my rimm short today. fortunately at 104.  Later i shorted it again at 109. So, if your theory is correct, rimm likely will drop in price tomorrow and aapl will not drop as much.  I hope you are right.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i found the barron's article to be an important topic.  It is difficult to predict what apple will guide for september, it makes more since why the stock has not gone up with 1 million iphone sold.  the iphone revenue will be spread over 2 years apparently.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kylelong100</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:34:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Price Manipulation, but Who and Why?</title><link>http://zacharybass.disqus.com/apple_price_manipulation_but_who_and_why/#comment-912872</link><description>I agree, my question was more of a general question.  I'm holding very lightly into earnings and plan to take advantage of any temporary weakness that may occur due to mis-reading the tea leaves.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, if oil falls tomorrow all bets are off and I feel ALL players will benefit (except the oil guys that is).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thom</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:52:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Price Manipulation, but Who and Why?</title><link>http://zacharybass.disqus.com/apple_price_manipulation_but_who_and_why/#comment-912515</link><description>in terms of competition, they are fall behind at this point in terms of iphone. but verizon is adding more subsidies to phone makers to compete with ATT.  I have no doubt iphone is far more better in software, but investors do not get too passionate and will wait for pure earnings and profit margins numbers before considering long lines outthere waiting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kylelong100</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:20:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Price Manipulation, but Who and Why?</title><link>http://zacharybass.disqus.com/apple_price_manipulation_but_who_and_why/#comment-912477</link><description>I am long on aapl and short on rimm.  but for the short term, with earnings coming up, it is safer to buy more after earnings. Macbook air, ipods, iphones have all cut prices. It is a good way to gain market share but investors may not like that at this point. I think down the future, when market shares really go grow, then it is safer to add shares of aapl.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kylelong100</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:17:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Price Manipulation, but Who and Why?</title><link>http://zacharybass.disqus.com/apple_price_manipulation_but_who_and_why/#comment-912049</link><description>Kylelong, can you show me where Apple is decreasing its prices?  If you are talking about the iPhone, ATT is subsidizing the device and cost to Apple to build 3G iPhone is less then it was for the original iPhone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What exact competition are you talking about at this point?  There are lines out the door in all countries, where are the lines for these so called competitors.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everything you are saying is unfounded and baseless FUD.  Back it up !!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yev</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:40:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Price Manipulation, but Who and Why?</title><link>http://zacharybass.disqus.com/apple_price_manipulation_but_who_and_why/#comment-911867</link><description>there could be some other reasons for this. the big money maybe thinking that the profit margins for aapl is declining. The iphone will not be added to the coming quarter earnings.  Apple generally does not need to decrease prices for its products but it is clearly doing that for all sectors of its business, especially for ipods and iphone. Iphone is understandable since there is so much competition and competition is increasing.  I still think iphone will be a major winner in the future but in the short term, with the earnings and the uncertainty of the bear market, we may have to wait till after earnings to think about buying.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kylelong100</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:24:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>