<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for kpwerker</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/kpwerker/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:56:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter Fail (or How NOT to Lead an Industry Online)</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/twitter_fail_or_how_not_to_lead_an_industry_online/#comment-22695568</link><description>It couldn't have, because I don't follow them so they couldn't have DMed me&lt;br&gt;initially.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But yes. It honestly didn't occur to me till I read your comment that the&lt;br&gt;whole thing shouldn't have been public. Then again, I don't mind at all that&lt;br&gt;it was, if for no other reason than it kicked me in the ass to write&lt;br&gt;something like this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:56:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Fail (or How NOT to Lead an Industry Online)</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/twitter_fail_or_how_not_to_lead_an_industry_online/#comment-22695485</link><description>I agree about ignorance. Which is why I wrote this post the way I did. I&lt;br&gt;think it would be an intense benefit to the industry (and not just to this&lt;br&gt;one) if its trade organization learned about this stuff so they can help to&lt;br&gt;educate their businesses about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't at all think their failure to understand Twitter is related to a&lt;br&gt;desire not to adapt or change.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:52:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kim Werker</title><link>http://kpwerkertumblr.disqus.com/kim_werker_60/#comment-22608650</link><description>Oh yeah. That's another thing I hadn't though about. The eating factor...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kim Werker</title><link>http://kpwerkertumblr.disqus.com/kim_werker_60/#comment-22587928</link><description>Ooh, I hadn't thought about neighbourhood prestige. You're right. *I* need the duck, too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:08:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing a Novel in a Month (and Other Fun Stuff)</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/writing_a_novel_in_a_month_and_other_fun_stuff/#comment-21696386</link><description>Right on. I just sent you an invite. Go, GIANT things!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:21:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whatcom Weavers Guild, Here I Come!</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/whatcom_weavers_guild_here_i_come/#comment-21668959</link><description>Oh, it's lovely! Thank you so much for sharing your link. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:25:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kim Werker</title><link>http://kpwerkertumblr.disqus.com/kim_werker_823/#comment-21377970</link><description>I'm kpwerker. Fun!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:02:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gary Vaynerchuk - This is a pretty big deal for me, I was walking...</title><link>http://garyvaynerchuk.disqus.com/gary_vaynerchuk_this_is_a_pretty_big_deal_for_me_i_was_walking/#comment-21259772</link><description>Hey, that's awesome! Congratulations! And welcome to Canada. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:22:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Want That on a T-Shirt : I am the state.</title><link>http://iwantthatonatshirt.disqus.com/i_want_that_on_a_t_shirt_i_am_the_state/#comment-20957610</link><description>Yeah. We weren't quoting, more like riffing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:42:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kim Werker</title><link>http://kpwerkertumblr.disqus.com/kim_werker_528/#comment-20895884</link><description>Oh, man, Lee. You're the best!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:27:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whatcom Weavers Guild, Here I Come!</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/whatcom_weavers_guild_here_i_come/#comment-20125023</link><description>Hi Kate. No, the potholders I posted on the &lt;a href="http://CrochetMe.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;CrochetMe.com&lt;/a&gt; blog were simply a&lt;br&gt;photo I found inspiring. People in the comments over there mentioned a&lt;br&gt;pattern, but so far nobody's said where it's from.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(There are organic cotton washcloths in Crocheted Gifts, but they're homey&lt;br&gt;and cozy as opposed to the bright and vibrant potholders.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:08:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s a Blogger?</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/what8217s_a_blogger/#comment-20063965</link><description>Hm. This is a great thing to bring up. Discussions online are certainly more&lt;br&gt;and more distributed, and I don't in any way think that's a bad thing.&lt;br&gt;There's certainly less overhead to conversing via Facebook or Twitter versus&lt;br&gt;a blog, but as could be shown by the discussion in the comments of this&lt;br&gt;post, alone, people still find some value in leaving their thoughts on the&lt;br&gt;actual post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Come to think of it, in many ways I think blog comments contribute to a&lt;br&gt;great degree to the value of the post itself. Even if some or even most of&lt;br&gt;the discussion happens off-site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Food for thought...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:00:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s a Blogger?</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/what8217s_a_blogger/#comment-20059939</link><description>Hm. I've never thought of myself as a commercial blogger. (Not with this&lt;br&gt;blog, anyway. It was different when I was writing the &lt;a href="http://CrochetMe.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;CrochetMe.com&lt;/a&gt; blog.)&lt;br&gt;But I can see why you think I am one. Really, I blog because I like to, and&lt;br&gt;I love the conversations that ensue both with people I know and with those I&lt;br&gt;don't know (yet). But aside from the posts I write that explicitly push my&lt;br&gt;books or events or whatever, I don't write posts with a goal in mind of&lt;br&gt;making sales. There are actually few things I've ever done with the explicit&lt;br&gt;goal of making sales. Selling things makes me queasy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, I recognize I owe my career to the things I've written and&lt;br&gt;created online. In that sense, yes, I can't divorce myself from the&lt;br&gt;awareness that what's posted online can have significant work/financial&lt;br&gt;impact.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, I'm not convinced that a blog without comments is still a blog. The&lt;br&gt;posts might be widely read or narrowly focused or serve some other very&lt;br&gt;specific purpose very well, but without conversation, it's not a blog.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I suppose what I mean is that I think a blog, in a very contemporary way, is&lt;br&gt;very specifically a website that has (loosely defined) frequently posted new&lt;br&gt;content and houses (at least the potential for) conversation. This is very&lt;br&gt;consciously contrasted with "old" media that simply provided fodder for&lt;br&gt;thought or for discussions elsewhere, letters to the editor notwithstanding.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:57:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s a Blogger?</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/what8217s_a_blogger/#comment-20059535</link><description>I don't think people leaving comments is what makes a blog, but more the&lt;br&gt;writer's openness to them. In other words, a blog that allows comments but&lt;br&gt;doesn't get any is still a blog. A website that has writing but no&lt;br&gt;commenting is not a blog. And in fact, I think openness to comments is the&lt;br&gt;only thing that defines a blog.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On closing comments after a certain period of time, I have no opinion.&lt;br&gt;Closing comments doesn't negate blogness; having comments open for any&lt;br&gt;significant time ensures blogness.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(I love that we disagree on this. It's like a crazy thing!)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:50:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s a Blogger?</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/what8217s_a_blogger/#comment-19677515</link><description>We were just considering this for the LexPublica blog. My preference,&lt;br&gt;especially for a new blog that people are discovering all the time, is to&lt;br&gt;keep comments open indefinitely so new visitors feel welcome to join into&lt;br&gt;the conversation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:41:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s a Blogger?</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/what8217s_a_blogger/#comment-19605105</link><description>I haven't seen your inbox, but I can imagine it. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't think participating in conversation needs to mean "reply to every&lt;br&gt;comment." (And I don't think that's what you're implying, either.) As a&lt;br&gt;blogger gets more known and their blog more popular, it becomes harder and&lt;br&gt;harder to stay connected to everyone who joins in on the conversation. That&lt;br&gt;just means the blogger's way of participating needs to evolve.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:01:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kim Werker</title><link>http://kpwerkertumblr.disqus.com/kim_werker_52/#comment-19434792</link><description>I bet we could ask Casey for those stats...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:47:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Advice For the Weekend</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/advice_for_the_weekend/#comment-18518093</link><description>Oh, yay! Thanks so much for letting me know. I'm glad the neighbourhood has&lt;br&gt;more good people in it, now. :) I've just started working full-time again (a&lt;br&gt;total craziness!), but I'll certainly come by for some new fall threads and&lt;br&gt;to say hello.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:38:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Return to Moonlighting</title><link>http://thecreativelife.disqus.com/a_return_to_moonlighting/#comment-18396932</link><description>(blushes) thank you so much, Kim! :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">twitter-38184917</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 17:42:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Return to Moonlighting</title><link>http://thecreativelife.disqus.com/a_return_to_moonlighting/#comment-17956725</link><description>A treasure trove of amazing advice! Thank you!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:24:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;raquo; About</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/raquo_about/#comment-17934348</link><description>I'm using Manos del Uruguay yarn; the main variegated one is colour 109.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:32:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s a Real Job, Anyway?</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/what8217s_a_real_job_anyway/#comment-17810066</link><description>The contracts we'll be working on first will be very simple; as such, there&lt;br&gt;shouldn't be jurisdictional issues in most English-speaking countries. It's&lt;br&gt;something the drafting teams will keep in mind, though, and also something&lt;br&gt;users might want to discuss with a lawyer if they know there's a local quirk&lt;br&gt;that's different from most places.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As we get going, this is certainly a topic we'll blog about.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:30:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Return to Moonlighting</title><link>http://thecreativelife.disqus.com/a_return_to_moonlighting/#comment-17790046</link><description>That's such good advice! I've been monitoring my me-time, too, and trying to&lt;br&gt;make sure I get an evening or two a week that I can spend in pajamas not&lt;br&gt;doing much of anything, including answering the phone (I hate the phone most&lt;br&gt;days). I fought hard for it over the last fifteen years, and my&lt;br&gt;self-awareness is something I value almost any other thing. It's certainly&lt;br&gt;making this massive transition less painful than it could be. That and&lt;br&gt;talking lots with my partner about it, since it's a big change for him, too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:58:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nobody Puts Pancreatic Cancer in the Corner</title><link>http://kim-werker-blog.disqus.com/nobody_puts_pancreatic_cancer_in_the_corner/#comment-16828458</link><description>It's certainly not a preferred surgery. I doubt they would have considered it had she not had such regular screenings, and therefore a lot of information about what the normal state of her pancreas was before it started to change. Living as an insulin-dependent diabetic is no small change!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, it was wonderful to be there. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:34:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking the Silence</title><link>http://thecreativelife.disqus.com/breaking_the_silence/#comment-16508682</link><description>Ramble on! And good luck with all the new adventures you're embarking on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kpwerker</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:28:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>