<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for kiley</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/kiley/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:33:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Mental Illness and the Movies</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/mental_illness_and_the_movies/#comment-20789237</link><description>not that this has all that much to do with the post, but if you like 'one flew over the cukoo's nest' (and i DO) dont' read the book. please. i beg you. It will change the movie for you and not in a good way...not in a good way at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but to further explore the question put before us - movies can make u sick. Especially if you're emotionally immersed and invested in what's happening before you. They can affect ur mood and seeing open displays of 'mental instability' can send u reeling in that direction. But i suppose they can 'heal' too, which is why I think it's good to keep a few back up movies to 'cleanse the mental palate' or act as a chaser after you watch the ones that are...'unstable'...like Quills...sheesh...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:33:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Escapism Festival Preview #1: The Last Unicorn</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/escapism_festival_preview_1_the_last_unicorn/#comment-20135406</link><description>OMG! I LOVED THE LAST UNICORN!! heh heh heh...when ur a young child u let movies get away with a lot: laybrynth, dark crystal, unico...legend....looking back, movies for kids in the 80s were really dark and meta-physical, (Flight of the Navagator was very disturbing to me, probably should give it another watch now i'm older...)and i mean 'Dungeons &amp; Dragons' was a saturday morning cartoon!! times have really changed...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and OMG professor doctor! I LOVED BMX Bandits and The Dirt Bike Kid!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:38:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk Needs Your Support</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/the_film_talk_needs_your_support/#comment-17111378</link><description>wow...i never pay for anything on the net...and i just did...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;it feels a little like driving a prius...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:09:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk &amp;#8211; Part 89 &amp;#8211; Extract / 9 / Gamer</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/the_film_talk_8211_part_89_8211_extract_9_gamer/#comment-16867937</link><description>aw, thanks!! it's a scent that really stays with ya!!...even now... ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:52:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk &amp;#8211; Part 89 &amp;#8211; Extract / 9 / Gamer</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/the_film_talk_8211_part_89_8211_extract_9_gamer/#comment-16819450</link><description>Patchouli!! THAT'S it!!....althouuugggh, having a branded mediterranean parsley dish scented air freshener could've been fun in it's own right! ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:36:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk &amp;#8211; Part 89 &amp;#8211; Extract / 9 / Gamer</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/the_film_talk_8211_part_89_8211_extract_9_gamer/#comment-16817664</link><description>Did you say "soap and Tabbouleh" (the mediterranean parsley dish?? ) or "soap and Patchouli" (Expected)? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cool video, and congrats. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">twitter-10303282</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:59:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk &amp;#8211; Part 89 &amp;#8211; Extract / 9 / Gamer</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/the_film_talk_8211_part_89_8211_extract_9_gamer/#comment-16813716</link><description>wow! i appreciate you taking the time to document the unveiling of the Taking Woodstock Branded Air Freshener - not everybody would do that, truly you understand us here at TFT&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jettloe</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:44:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Film Talk &amp;#8211; Part 89 &amp;#8211; Extract / 9 / Gamer</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/the_film_talk_8211_part_89_8211_extract_9_gamer/#comment-16807739</link><description>ok, so i posted a vid on seesmic for the "Big Reveal" moment of the scent of the branded Taking Woodstock air freshner...it didn't post here in the comments, BUT:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://seesmic.tv/videos/blH0o59en1" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://seesmic.tv/videos/blH0o59en1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...and the scent still lingers....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:49:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Latest On-Set Photo from James Cameron&amp;#8217;s Avatar</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/latest_on_set_photo_from_james_cameron8217s_avatar/#comment-15263631</link><description>Hey, look on the bright side - at least it's not COMIC SANS.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jettloe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:40:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Latest On-Set Photo from James Cameron&amp;#8217;s Avatar</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/latest_on_set_photo_from_james_cameron8217s_avatar/#comment-15236849</link><description>just saw the trailer....why, o. why did they EVER use the papyrus font???!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:14:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Today&amp;#8217;s Podcast: Francis Ford Coppola Interviewed</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/today8217s_podcast_francis_ford_coppola_interviewed/#comment-15109379</link><description>Yep, one can think of it more like painting than 'film' or chemical based photography.  The obvious, early effect of this is that a moving away from the real - or the sense of the 'real' - but it'll come back. - it's like all those crappy images one saw after Photoshop was released - just because a PS Filter exists doesn't mean one has to use it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jettloe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:48:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Today&amp;#8217;s Podcast: Francis Ford Coppola Interviewed</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/today8217s_podcast_francis_ford_coppola_interviewed/#comment-15007672</link><description>whoa, ok, that whole part about digital film allowing the artist to compose the film was very profound! I've had a negative (ok, seriously NOT a pun, i SWEAR!) view towards digital film, getting afraid it was making things too...sterilized...too easy for the artist...(should all art have a degree of suffering? idk..but it feels more 'real' if it does...) but when he said that it gives the artist control over the light levels, the colors, just the entire shot has COMPLETELY reversed my thinking!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:08:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Latest Podcast: &amp;#8216;Brüno&amp;#8217; and &amp;#8216;Public Enemies&amp;#8217;, Part 2</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/latest_podcast_8216bruno8217_and_8216public_enemies8217_part_2/#comment-12684535</link><description>haven't made it thru the whole podcast yet, but felt compelled to say, "exactly!!!" to jett's bruno review! just had a very VERY similar conversation with my own Belfast-ian best friend ;) - he sees no merit or worth in anything that sacsha barron cohen does (except his attack on the NI politicians as ali g). I do NOT think ur reading too much into it, jett, cuz i saw/felt the same things! EVERYone was in on the joke...and that's the joke, or statement, rather.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;now on to the Public Enemies review.... :D</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:21:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;ve Fallen and Can&amp;#8217;t Get Up &amp;#8211; AKA &amp;#8220;Take One &amp;#8216;Raiders of the Lost Ark&amp;#8217; and Call Me in the Morning&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/i8217ve_fallen_and_can8217t_get_up_8211_aka_8220take_one_8216raiders_of_the_lost_ark8217_and_call_me/#comment-11727528</link><description>ahhh, wit, action and explosions ONLY when necessary - that's how ya spell relief! ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(and all that in only under five minutes too!)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:43:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3&amp;#8242; &amp;#8211; A Plea</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/8216the_taking_of_pelham_1_2_38242_8211_a_plea/#comment-10824388</link><description>you must do this. it is ur legacy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;plus, you know, it could be rife with symbolism that you and the good professor doctor can argue fervently about (c'mon there's got to be a 9-11 reference in there somewhere!!), much to our enjoyment and amusement!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;dance monkeys, dance... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;kidding!!! ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:00:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Week&amp;#8217;s Podcast: Jett vs. Gareth on &amp;#8216;The Hangover&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/this_week8217s_podcast_jett_vs_gareth_on_8216the_hangover8217/#comment-10797544</link><description>'classic' meaning we actually live up to our strapline by disagreeing on films!  we'll see what happens with 'the taking of pelham 123'!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jettloe</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:27:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Week&amp;#8217;s Podcast: Jett vs. Gareth on &amp;#8216;The Hangover&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/this_week8217s_podcast_jett_vs_gareth_on_8216the_hangover8217/#comment-10784562</link><description>Layers upon layers</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:14:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Audience of One&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/8216audience_of_one8217/#comment-10395034</link><description>first off, blame my jaded mentality and natural cynicism...(and granted, i have NOT seen this film/documentary, so anything i'm saying is compLETEly pre-judgmental and NOT based in fact :P !!) BUT...the whole idea of it seems...well...pre-fab...i mean, who decided to make a documentary out of this and why? (and yes, it bring to mind 'Lost in LaMancha' right off the bat..) i checked out the website, but that only brought more suspicious questions to mind - like, what are the filmmakers showing us here? what's their purpose? how NOT to make a movie? or was it's motivation more like a nature show, where the documenters have to sit back and let the shark eat the baby sea turtle, knowing the little turtle was doomed to failure?  it's seems more 'entertainment' than to inform or document something - i know, i know, like i said: blame my natural cynicism! apologies all round! i may be vastly more open minded after i watch it...(congrats btw, professor dr! :D )</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:08:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three Questions about &amp;#8216;Terminator Salvation&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/three_questions_about_8216terminator_salvation8217/#comment-10366462</link><description>whispers loudly: Jett, I thought you said this guy was 'absurdly brilliant'?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:56:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lars von Trier&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8216;Antichrist&amp;#8217;: Theopoetry or Cosmic Joke?</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/lars_von_trier8217s_8216antichrist8217_theopoetry_or_cosmic_joke/#comment-10060089</link><description>my mother was an eschatologist, so i actually read hal lindsey when i was a really young (haven't heard that name in a loooong time! LOL) and all that 'end of time' talk/studying i grew up around did was successfully turn me into a 'well-read' atheist who has never been scared by a horror movie...ever ;) - so it still to this day does kinda 'intrigue' me about how modern, 'civilised' people can believe in such a... varied, horrifying, mythical end, pinning all the 'evils of the world' on one person, who is the exact literal opposite of the 'christ' figure, hence the ANTI in anti-christ, dur da dur ;) ...but i mean, then u go back to the argument of did good begin evil, or evil begin good and can either really exist without the other? - except in reality all of that is moot since these are both intangible concepts and don't really exist anyway...ok, ok it's too early for this, i know, i know - i need coffee ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BUT, after reading the linked reviews, i think i have to see this movie!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 11:50:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;The Terminator&amp;#8217; and Temporal Anomalies in Time Travel Movies</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/8216the_terminator8217_and_temporal_anomalies_in_time_travel_movies/#comment-9936341</link><description>i agree that the story is the main thing and i can suspend my logic as long as it's drawing me in&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...like in Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;*cough, cough*</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:16:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Angels and Demons&amp;#8217; Podcast now Online</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/8216angels_and_demons8217_podcast_now_online/#comment-9470037</link><description>all i can say is: way to take one for the team!!! once again ya'lls dedication is proven, cuz there was NO WAY i'd even go near this...thing... (Honestly? I have a hard time seeing Tom Hanks outside of 'Bosom Buddies" or..."big".."batchelor party"..."the money pit"...wow, what happened to THAT tom hanks?!...THAT tom hanks woulda ended up a cylon on bsg!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;now, to add my two theo-political-pursuit-of-happiness-in-media cents: as far as dawkins/hitchens being 'throw aways,' - ultimately, since the dawn of man, there have been people that believed in god(s) and people that don't, and it will always be that way. Now whether or not the pursuit of science is akin to the pursuit of faith is debatable, but it does make for great screenwriting fodder because it's a 'collision,' if you will, that is eternal and affects the common man - so way to drop the ball on that one ron howard! ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and just what is a 'symbolist' anyway? &lt;br&gt;please tell me that is a dan brown created term and not an actual career...sounds like to me that Indy knew more about symbolism and the church than any tom hanks 'symbolist'!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 09:38:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nashville Film Festival - Video Diary 3 - Saving Money at the Fest, Sort Of</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/nashville_film_festival_video_diary_3_saving_money_at_the_fest_sort_of/#comment-8363056</link><description>but I FEEL OLD...sigh.  Perhaps with feeling aged will come wisdom.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jettloe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 23:38:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nashville Film Festival - Video Diary 3 - Saving Money at the Fest, Sort Of</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/nashville_film_festival_video_diary_3_saving_money_at_the_fest_sort_of/#comment-8355334</link><description>YOU ARE NOT OLD!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kiley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:45:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Film Ever Made</title><link>http://thefilmtalk.disqus.com/the_best_film_ever_made/#comment-7825851</link><description>am glad that we're making a difference! now if I can just get more people to watch Andrey Rublyov!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jettloe</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:53:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>