<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for kendall</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/kendall/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/kendall/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:56:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Stardog 1.2—Clark &amp; Parsia: Thinking Clearly</title><link>http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2013/04/22/stardog-12/#comment-874279343</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hadn't looked at it till this AM.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We're solving a different problem, but thanks for pointing it out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:56:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: John Boehner’s Hostage Crisis</title><link>http://www.motherjones.com/node/209356#comment-726202787</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good piece; but the moon bats theological antipathy isn't to higher taxes only: it's really to what the rest of us think of as civilization per se, which of course taxes pay for.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:35:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2012/09/27/stardog-whats-coming-next/</title><link>http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2012/09/27/stardog-whats-coming-next/#comment-692001419</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will be happy to do that. We haven't yet decided how to release a pre-1.0 GeoSPARQL implementation in Stardog, but we'll figure something out and announce it here (and on Twitter: @stardog_db).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:20:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Raw Meat: Originalist Indexicals</title><link>http://qblog.aaronsw.com/post/31798309617#comment-654580592</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Because believing that (absurd thing) allows him to do two things: (1) to maintain the politically correct (for him) view (capital punishment is fine &amp;amp; dandy); and (2) to base that politically-motivated view on a "tough" and "unconvention" reading of "the law" such that his ego and standing are also heightened amongst his base of political support.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obvs. :&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:47:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Semantic Web Jobs: SAIC</title><link>http://semanticweb.com/semantic-web-jobs-saic-3_b30656#comment-586009790</link><description>&lt;p&gt;First job listing I've seen that mentions experience with Stardog as a preference. Sweet!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:50:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stardog—Stardog: Documentation: Java Programming</title><link>http://192.168.69.56:5822/docs/java/#comment-574596998</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Test&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 16:08:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stardog—Stardog: Documentation: Terminology</title><link>http://stardog.com/docs/term/#comment-564637924</link><description>&lt;p&gt;See &lt;a href="http://stardog.com/docs/network/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://stardog.com/docs/network/"&gt;http://stardog.com/docs/net...&lt;/a&gt; which includes a section on SNARL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's the native Stardog data access &amp;amp; control protocol, based on Google Protocol Buffers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:45:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stardog—Documentation: Quick Start</title><link>http://stardog.com/docs/quick-start/#comment-564637015</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For quick start and testing? No.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For a more thorough discussion of security issues, see &lt;a href="http://stardog.com/docs/security" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://stardog.com/docs/security"&gt;http://stardog.com/docs/sec...&lt;/a&gt; which goes into a lot of detail about secured deployments.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:44:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stardog: Documentation: OWL 2 Reasoning</title><link>http://stardog.com/docs/owl2/#comment-509993974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Reasoning is enabled *per query* and is off by default. You enable it by passing reasoning=$reasoning_level. See &lt;a href="http://stardog.com/docs/admin/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://stardog.com/docs/admin/"&gt;http://stardog.com/docs/admin/&lt;/a&gt; for details about how to do that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:09:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2011/09/19/semantic-versioning-and-owl-ontologies/</title><link>http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2011/09/19/semantic-versioning-and-owl-ontologies/#comment-316628287</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I didn't say anything about any other ontologies that get imported by the one that's being versioned. I didn't for two reasons: first, after import closure is taken, imports aren't really visibile any more, so in some sense they don't really matter as imports. But, second, I was trying to keep things a bit simpler since the piece was already too long. :&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The subtle difference you point out, though, is that versioning an ontology is one thing; versioning a data access service that's described by an ontology is something else. What differences in versioning should be applied? I don't know, but you've highlighted some important issues to think about.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:16:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linked Data Influencer Under Indictment For Data Theft - semanticweb.com</title><link>http://semanticweb.com/linked-data-influencer-under-indictment-for-data-theft_b21718#comment-259679284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but there's no reason to believe that anything Aaron did (or didn't do) jeopardizes *anything*, much less something as nebulous as "the reputation of the open access movement at large", which is driven by the inevitability of technological and economic upheaval, not individual actions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For a competing, and vastly more coherent view, see &lt;a href="http://thinkprogress.org/yglesias/2011/07/20/273897/academic-work-should-be-distributed-for-free/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://thinkprogress.org/yglesias/2011/07/20/273897/academic-work-should-be-distributed-for-free/"&gt;http://thinkprogress.org/yg...&lt;/a&gt; -- which points out, rightly, that the Forbes piece is a clever bit of concern trolling and should be ignored.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:05:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stardog—Stardog: Documentation: Java Programming</title><link>http://stardog.com/docs/java/#comment-257532160</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Do you mean have HTTP server use connection pools internally?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:50:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wouldn't Target Be a Better Place for Gun Sales?</title><link>https://dcist.com/story/11/07/07/wouldnt-target-be-a-better-place-fo/#comment-245423451</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"easier criminal access to firearms"... FTFY: "legal citizen access to firearms".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:06:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2011/05/31/stardog-performance-sp2b-benchmark/</title><link>http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2011/05/31/stardog-performance-sp2b-benchmark/#comment-214976338</link><description>&lt;p&gt;SP2B is available from and discussed in detail at &lt;a href="http://dbis.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/index.php?project=SP2B" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://dbis.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/index.php?project=SP2B"&gt;http://dbis.informatik.uni-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 15:49:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2011/05/04/how-to-create-business-value-with-semantic-tech/</title><link>http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2011/05/04/how-to-create-business-value-with-semantic-tech/#comment-197021360</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As you know, Semweb encompasses HTTP, REST, and to a growing extent, JSON. So let's say you can get *most* of the CsansC benefits of Web 2.0 in Semweb development. Okay, now, does Semweb add anything else that's unique to it? For example, does the schema flexibility along a huge spectrum also enable CsansC? I think it does, clearly. Does "richer" (in whatever sense) data formats like RDF and OWL ever enable extra benefits? I think being able to push some kinds of business logic into the data, thereby making data instead of code or an API, the unit of exchange has clear benefits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;YMMV, of course, but the overriding point is that Semweb and Web 2.0 are perfectly useful together, so the either/or question isn't something that anyone has to decide on, IMO.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, there are a lot *more* Web 2.0 APIs around, but that doesn't mean it's a better approach. It does mean it's a more popular one, but that can be for all sorts of good and bad reasons.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 14:21:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Defense Of Entertainment</title><link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2011/04/in-defense-of-entertainment/#comment-193553547</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, it is preferable. Those people (actors and musicians) may well contribute something valuable to the culture. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:41:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Defense Of Entertainment</title><link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2011/04/in-defense-of-entertainment/#comment-193525143</link><description>&lt;p&gt;People can pursue whatever frivolous distractions they prefer; we live in *hard* times. But for Americans, in particular, to fawn all over hereditary monarchy is especially disgusting. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:11:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barack Obama&amp;#8217;s Deficit Plan</title><link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2011/04/barack-obamas-deficit-plan/#comment-183896718</link><description>&lt;p&gt;$800B out of non-discretionary is going to hurt: will be hard to do that w/out slashing science, R&amp;amp;D, and all the other civilization building things that actually, you know, help people, create jobs, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:40:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Debt Ceiling Hostage Rescue Strategy</title><link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2011/04/a-debt-ceiling-hostage-rescue-strategy/#comment-182535455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Chances that Obama or the Dems will do any of this reasonable strategy? Very, very small, alas.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:16:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dydra | Dydra Lifts Off</title><link>http://blog.dydra.com/2011/02/07/liftoff#comment-142009137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good show, guys; pretty site and the service looks very interesting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 14:09:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2010/12/29/stardog-is-coming/</title><link>http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2010/12/29/stardog-is-coming/#comment-131820627</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sent a private reply to Miguel.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:13:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2010/12/29/stardog-is-coming/</title><link>http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2010/12/29/stardog-is-coming/#comment-126865236</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gotcha!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:40:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2010/12/14/introducing-spanner/</title><link>http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2010/12/14/introducing-spanner/#comment-121263502</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We'll be trying to give a talk at SemTech 2011 in June in SanFran about Spanner with our first Spanner reference customer, NASA. Should be fun; if, that is, we're accepted. :&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:08:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2010/12/29/stardog-is-coming/</title><link>http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2010/12/29/stardog-is-coming/#comment-120813183</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gotcha.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:21:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2010/12/29/stardog-is-coming/</title><link>http://weblog.clarkparsia.com/2010/12/29/stardog-is-coming/#comment-120766454</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an early version of the Stardog mascot, which will refined a bit further before we launch. If you haven't heard about Stardog yet, it's our forthcoming RDF database that's pure Java and insanely fast. If you're interested in the private beta, leave me a comment in this thread and I'll add you to the list.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kendall</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:46:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>