<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for kdonovan11</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/kdonovan11/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/kdonovan11/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:40:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Political Economy of M-PESA</title><link>http://blurringborders.com/?p=888#comment-231325959</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Jeffrey. I know and like her work, but kept this paper a bit more theoretical (though I do cite it). &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Donovan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:40:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Regarding Power in the Network Society</title><link>http://blurringborders.com/2010/11/14/power-in-the-network-societ/#comment-97077957</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To me, Wu &amp;amp; Goldsmith was about reasserting the nation state, which was important, but Grewal's is a bit more subtle, and focused on more than just states. Would be interested to hear your thoughts if you get around to reading it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Donovan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 11:43:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Micro-Macro Paradox in Foreign Aid vs. ICT4D</title><link>http://blurringborders.com/2010/08/17/micro-macro-paradox-in-foreign-aid-vs-ict4d/#comment-69378408</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting - I was actually trying to make a slightly different point: If we want ICTs to positively contribute towards development goals, we shouldn't focus on the micro-level projects or macro-level indicators. Those are paradoxically in opposition, it seems. Instead, we should focus in between them, at the meso-level institutions which answer the contextualized questions about why success happens at the micro- or macro-level.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, I think you're right - using ICTs will likely be most effective (with bigger externalities) at mid-level institutions where the ramifications will flow both up and down. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Donovan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:56:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>