<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jthake</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-2dc656ec" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/jthake/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:17:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Which Build Servers in SharePoint &amp;ndash; The Results</title><link>http://www.21apps.com/sharepoint/which-build-servers-the-results/#comment-19891684</link><description>Although dev teams have access to TFS, my question would be what are they actually doing with it. Are they just building the source on a build machine? are they doing deployment? unit testing? integration testing? release management? configuration management? etc. I often find they just use TFS for source control and that's as far as they go because "it's too hard to set up TFS to do builds with SharePoint"...we all know that isn't true!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jthake</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:17:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to manage the noise of #SPC09 - SharePoint Development Blog by Jeremy Thake in Perth, Australia</title><link>http://wss.made4the.net/archive/2009/10/05/how-to-manage-the-noise-of-spc09.aspx?id=797#comment-19846128</link><description>There is going to be plenty of noise at #SPC09, but I think that Twitter will be a great way for non attendees to feel part of it all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jthake</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:27:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WSSWiki.com</title><link>http://www.paulliebrand.com/2009/10/07/wsswiki-com/#comment-19464215</link><description>Thanks again for doing this mate, I really appreciate your support!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jthake</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:37:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Steps to Prepare for SharePoint Conference #SPC09 - SharePoint Joel&amp;#39;s SharePoint Land</title><link>http://www.sharepointjoel.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?List=0cd1a63d%2D183c%2D4fc2%2D8320%2Dba5369008acb&amp;ID=263#comment-19021712</link><description>Great advice mate and thanks for the references ;-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jthake</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:17:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What’s Up? NDA or NOT? Office 2010 Technical Preview vs. SharePoint 2010 Technical Beta - SharePoint Joel&amp;#39;s SharePoint Land</title><link>http://www.sharepointjoel.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=243#comment-12986901</link><description>It's a shame that this didn't come from Microsoft themselves as an official announcement somewhere to guide bloggers. Microsoft should be greatful for the noise and buzz around #SP2010 and not being negative towards it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jthake</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:29:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What’s Up? NDA or NOT? Office 2010 Technical Preview vs. SharePoint 2010 Technical Beta - SharePoint Joel&amp;#39;s SharePoint Land</title><link>http://www.sharepointjoel.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?List=0cd1a63d%2D183c%2D4fc2%2D8320%2Dba5369008acb&amp;ID=243#comment-12985583</link><description>I can't see an issue with talking about the SDK if it's been publically released...they can go ahead and read it...OR they could read someones analysis on what has changed instead to save them the time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jthake</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:31:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Best Practices of SharePoint Farm configuring and deployment&amp;#8221;. Part 5 - Virtualization</title><link>http://sharepointmagazine.net/?p=3198#comment-11550190</link><description>@Wictor just posted his survey on virtualisation in SharePoint...interesting to see 75% virtualisating database layer.&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;a href="&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wictorwilen.se/Post/SharePoint-Virtualization-Survey-results.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.wictorwilen.se/Post/SharePoint-Virtu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;"&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wictorwilen.se/Post/SharePoint-Virtualization-Survey-results.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.wictorwilen.se/Post/SharePoint-Virtu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jthake</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:58:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Best Practices of SharePoint Farm configuring and deployment&amp;#8221;. Part 3 - Development Environment</title><link>http://sharepointmagazine.net/?p=3183#comment-10692325</link><description>Also worth a mention is WSPBuilder instead of STSDev or VSeWSS. The &lt;a href="http://SharePointDevWIki.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;SharePointDevWIki.com&lt;/a&gt; has more details on setting up a Development Environment too here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public/Building+a+SharePoint+Development+Environment" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public/Building+a+SharePoint+Development+Environment&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and also a comparison of VSeWSS, WSPBuilder and STSDEv in more detail:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public/Solution+package+development+tool+comparisons" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public/Solution+package+development+tool+comparisons&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The dev survey showed that most are using WSPBuilder:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public/SharePoint+Implementation+Survey" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public/SharePoint+Implementation+Survey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A more comprehensive list of Dev Tools is available here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public/SharePoint+Development+Tools" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public/SharePoint+Development+Tools&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jthake</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:30:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Customizing the User Experience of SharePoint: Lists, Custom list forms, and CAML Views (Part 3 of 6)</title><link>http://sharepointmagazine.net/?p=2665#comment-9119793</link><description>You may also want to take a look at SPSource to allow you to reverse engineer lists you build in the web ui and generate those horrible schema.xml and associated files for you ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.codeplex.com/spsource" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.codeplex.com/spsource&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jthake</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 01:36:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introducing Project Aberdovey: Scrum for SharePoint</title><link>http://www.21apps.com/sharepoint/introducing-project-aberdovey/#comment-9085311</link><description>Andrew, sounds interesting mate, I've seen Conchango in action and was impressed. But having the ability to manage SCRUM projects without TFS will make a very compellling reason and prevent the excuses around not wanting TFS due to costs and complexities etc.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jthake</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 02:23:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More great Unit Testing SharePoint Examples</title><link>http://www.21apps.com/sharepoint/unit-testing-sharepoint-examples/#comment-8673444</link><description>Wow thanks for the links man ;-)&lt;br&gt;Looking forward to seeing what others are doing in this space! and also what you continue to do!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jthake</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:26:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Customizing the User Experience of SharePoint: Fast track to Feature Generation (Part 6 of 6)</title><link>http://sharepointmagazine.net/?p=2691#comment-6646946</link><description>I think it's only fair to mention the other SharePoint Development Tools rather than just mentioning WSPBuilder, especially with the new features that VSeWSS 1.3 CTP has in it. For more information on comparing these tools, check out:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public/Solution+package+development+tool+comparisons" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;SPSource will also fully automate reverse engineering fields, content types and pages straight in Visual Studio hooked into a build event rather than using SP Manager.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jthake</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:53:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Isolator for Sharepoint Contest - Winner Update</title><link>http://blog.typemock.com/2008/12/isolator-for-sharepoint-contest-winner.html#comment-4165008</link><description>Thanks for the software! Be sure to check out &lt;a href="http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.sharepointdevwiki.com&lt;/a&gt; as they'll certainly be some best practice stuff around unit testing there shortly!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jthake</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 09:07:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Successful SharePoint Projects, Myth or Reality?</title><link>http://sharepointmagazine.net/?p=1735#comment-4144521</link><description>I liked your take on Project Management and include the comparison of customisation and development. Very topical at the moment with the points I raised in my most recent blog article. This is something that the community as a whole needs to define more clearly. Where the line is drawn and some scenarios to set both the end users expectations but also the SharePoint teams too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://wss.made4the.net/archive/2008/11/25/where-to-draw-the-line-between-sharepoint-customisation-and-sharepoint-development.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;Where to draw the line between SharePoint Customisation and SharePoint Development&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;It also aligns nicely with the other articles I've written on this web site about Leveraging the SharePoint Platform:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://sharepointmagazine.net/technical/development/leveraging-the-sharepoint-platform-part-1" rel="nofollow"&gt;Leveraging the SharePoint Platform&lt;/a&gt;. I agree completely that the SharePoint Platform is a large area and pretending you know all it's functionality is insanity! The most common one I see repeated everywhere is the Intranet Phone Book app rather than just using MOSS User Profiles and People Search!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jthake</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:29:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leveraging the SharePoint Platform (Part 2)</title><link>http://sharepointmagazine.net/?p=668#comment-2099057</link><description>Surely someone must have some opinions on this? Come on guys....not feeling the love here ;-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jthake</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:59:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft SharePoint on the iPhone</title><link>http://sharepointmagazine.net/news/microsoft-sharepoint-on-the-iphone#comment-1060436</link><description>Still debating whether to chop in the HTC Tytn II. Browsing is so much easier on iPod Touch, but still unsure for email and calendar etc.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jthake</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:03:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>