<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jratlee</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/jratlee/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/jratlee/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:50:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: everyday observations of regular people • lamb: I’m not the one that you should be making...</title><link>http://jratlee.com/post/55138659000#comment-958606739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;no sweat!  def my fav. track off her album.  the video and even her live perform on jimmy fallon is a treat.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 09:50:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Content Marketing Simplified</title><link>http://avc.com/2013/04/content-marketing-simplified/#comment-849623283</link><description>&lt;p&gt;economics aside, the tech &amp;amp; platforms are allowing brands to have a voice &amp;amp; easily share their opinion.  less the connection to existing editorial, it's about people sitting around a table and saying, "we can do this and here's the story we want to tell."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;yes, it can ladder up to a higher marketing meaning but what you're doing - from a brand POV - is actually expressing something.  caring, nurturing, explaining &amp;amp; relating.  sometimes, a more effective stance is wanting to be a partner with your customer throughout their life vs. always trying to suck the life out of them.  what matters more?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:02:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How 30 Undercurrent clients design their digital and social organizational structure</title><link>http://undercurrent.com/post/how-30-undercurrent-clients-design-their-digital-and-social-organizational-structure/#comment-721505965</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Link to the Forrester study gives a good 'ol 404.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:13:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://jratlee.com/post/24808001862</title><link>http://jratlee.com/post/24808001862#comment-704377158</link><description>&lt;p&gt;haha this is a crappy bagel place in caldwell, nj.  i'm desperately trying to find that louis ck bit you mentioned but i can't.  have you been able to find it?  looks like you're having some fun in NO!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 12:48:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In case of emergency (gear for this one or the next)</title><link>https://thewirecutter.com/blog/gear-in-case-of-emergency/#comment-696686975</link><description>&lt;p&gt;great list guys - i made a svpply collection of my favs &amp;amp; some extra items here (kept the refer code for ya):  &lt;a href="https://svpply.com/jratlee/collections/107712/In_Case_of_Emergency" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://svpply.com/jratlee/collections/107712/In_Case_of_Emergency"&gt;https://svpply.com/jratlee/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:06:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Second Screen, Third Screen, ...</title><link>http://avc.com/2012/10/second-screen-third-screen-/#comment-685233440</link><description>&lt;p&gt;exactly.  the stuff that we're all talking about today will stick with us throughout the election or, at least, the rest of the week.  rhetoric or policy claims aside, it was nice to focus on the interpersonal interactions in the town hall format.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:43:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Second Screen, Third Screen, ...</title><link>http://avc.com/2012/10/second-screen-third-screen-/#comment-685222800</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Totally agree.  That stuff will always be there tomorrow though.  It's exhaustive, just like you experienced, trying to keep up.  Knowing I could tune-in to the second screen afterwards and still participate/enjoy the commentary was enough.  What probably spurred this was DVR'ing the start of the debate b/c I wanted to finish the 30 for 30 on ESPN first in live time.  So, I started watching on about a three minute delay.  Didn't want the live feeds to spoil what was coming up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:29:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Second Screen, Third Screen, ...</title><link>http://avc.com/2012/10/second-screen-third-screen-/#comment-685213446</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I took a different route.  I put the phones and other screens down and listened intently, thought critically.  It was a nice change of pace from the first &amp;amp; second times around - trying to follow a lot of quick shot commentary that doesn't have much lasting value.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:16:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://jratlee.com/post/26405754134</title><link>http://jratlee.com/post/26405754134#comment-575474243</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lol nice.  it's the compliment to this image taken a few years ago at the harbor:  &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jratlee/256610781/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jratlee/256610781/"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 14:30:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: zachklein (via dpstyles):


 It’s not the... -  everyday observations of regular people</title><link>http://jratlee.com/post/105064977#comment-267700672</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No problem.  Hopefully, you've properly attributed to it in your works cited.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:00:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: hybrowse.com</title><link>http://jratlee.com/post/380383271#comment-267699967</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No problem.  Hopefully, you've properly attributed to it in your works cited.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:59:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Hidden Charge</title><link>http://jratlee.com/post/5251390182#comment-198739621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly.  Everyone wonders how paying for someone's time can flux so wildly&lt;br&gt;sometimes.  It's never a one-to-one comparison.  The execution of craft is&lt;br&gt;what sets one from another, forever.  It's the simple argument behind basic&lt;br&gt;things like food, complex things like creative work and premises behind&lt;br&gt;empires (i.e. Apple).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 17:04:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://jratlee.com/post/5150810207</title><link>http://jratlee.com/post/5150810207#comment-196081961</link><description>&lt;p&gt;psshhttt.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 23:25:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Onward, to the Plex.</title><link>http://caro.tumblr.com/post/4811846063#comment-189035380</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Best of luck!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://jratlee.com/post/4641881340</title><link>http://jratlee.com/post/4641881340#comment-185437862</link><description>&lt;p&gt;all day long&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:14:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://poploser.org/post/4558156289</title><link>http://poploser.org/post/4558156289#comment-183381547</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But, they're now monetizing the majority of the remaining traffic not just with ads (i.e. the Lincoln sponsorship) but the paywall itself.  So, while there is a traffic decrease (which was 100% expected) - they're likely (hopefully) making more money on the remaining traffic.  This also probably doesn't account for their various apps accessing the content which the paywall also dictates.  Who knows, I could be all wrong but lots of times these paywall arguments sensationalize without taking into account economics.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:42:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Important $7.60</title><link>http://jratlee.com/post/3959954162#comment-168188939</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Me too. Dinosaurs never had humans, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 11:03:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Switching to Tumblr, full stop</title><link>http://joshuatopolsky.tumblr.com/post/3808048077#comment-165055971</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i think i still have the script saved on my servers.  if i'm able to dig it up, did you want me to shoot it over to you somehow?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 09:48:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Switching to Tumblr, full stop</title><link>http://joshuatopolsky.tumblr.com/post/3808048077#comment-164782208</link><description>&lt;p&gt;here's the code i used to import from wp to tumblr.  worked pretty weill:  &lt;a href="http://jratlee.com/post/28691184/darshan-bavaria-rules" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://jratlee.com/post/28691184/darshan-bavaria-rules"&gt;http://jratlee.com/post/286...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:12:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blind 2007 Napa Cabernet Tasting with a Very Special Guest</title><link>https://tv.winelibrary.com/2011/02/03/blind-2007-napa-cabernet-tasting-with-a-very-special-guest-episode-980/#comment-139831386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is that cheese sold on Gourmet Library?  Only watch on occasion but it'd be a good idea to tag stuff that's sold on there as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:47:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://jratlee.com/post/3007934126</title><link>http://jratlee.com/post/3007934126#comment-137653631</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i hear ya.  the tech and the training have turned the men's game into a&lt;br&gt;baseline thing.  there is still pretty good nuance though but it's tough to&lt;br&gt;catch unless you really play the game.  the women's have a bit more nuance&lt;br&gt;b/c the game isn't as fast.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:08:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://jratlee.com/post/1179591895</title><link>http://jratlee.com/post/1179591895#comment-80594424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Suuuuch a good beer.  Certainly in my top 3 favorite.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:20:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marco Arment Leaves Tumblr To Devote Himself To Instapaper</title><link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/21/marco-arment-instapaper/#comment-79822943</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes - kudos to Marco, great mind and we're indebted to him for the work he's done with Tumblr and Instapaper.  Although, I'm actually worried about the path Tumblr takes now.  Similar to the big post Alex Payne just did regarding Twitter and why he left.  As much as there might not be more to this story, I have a weird feeling there is.  Regardless, whatever Marco does moving forward is going to be great.  I just hope I can say the same for Tumblr.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:34:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://jratlee.com/post/578806045</title><link>http://jratlee.com/post/578806045#comment-49032589</link><description>&lt;p&gt;haha maybe?  or maybe plastic bags?  not sure.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 18:45:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Random updates.</title><link>http://tracycalabrese.com/post/557168696#comment-47339096</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sounds like life is good bud.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john ratcliffe-lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>