<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jpriceless</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/jpriceless/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/jpriceless/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:05:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: iphone apps for 11/20/2008</title><link>http://www.robzand.com/blog/iphone-apps-for-11202008#comment-3913605</link><description>&lt;p&gt;four screens. nice. i did not know there was a delicious app. downloading now. BTW - the google voice thing is still a toy, not a tipping point. The recognition is pretty impressive though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jpriceless</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:05:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: tweetup topic ideas</title><link>http://www.robzand.com/blog/tweetup-topic-ideas#comment-978908</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Monetization is not always fun, but it is a worthy topic for discussion. How will trying to lasso these tools to increase profits, "ROI", and other such terms, make them lame? What ways could companies gracefully enter the conversation without being lame? We've already seen some examples from the client support realm and there is a quote from a Dell employee regarding many millions they made as a result of joining the conversation as humans and not marketers. There are also plenty of examples of how not to join the fray. What are the factors that will determine lameness-to-coolness spectrum?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jpriceless</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:06:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>