<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of jmacofearth</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/jmacofearth/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:52:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Unboxing the Asus UL20A 12.1 inch laptop</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/unboxing-the-asus-ul20a-12-1-inch-laptop.html#comment-22574638</link><description>It does not seem to.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:52:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Acer Aspire 1410 review (dual core version)</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/acer-aspire-1410-review-dual-core-version.html#comment-22574273</link><description>I've spent the last two years thinking about these issues. There have been&lt;br&gt;laptops without optical drives that are most certainly not netbooks. The&lt;br&gt;Asus UL30A I reviewed recently lacked one. But it has a 13.3 inch screen.&lt;br&gt;Would you call that a netbook?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've written several manifestos over the years describing what I think a&lt;br&gt;netbook is, and while it may not entirely be up to me to decide, I've been&lt;br&gt;pretty consistent. If you check the "about" page, you'll find the&lt;br&gt;description I wrote over a year ago and it's the same as the one I just gave&lt;br&gt;you in terms of size, weight, and price.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not sure why you're insisting that netbooks aren't laptops though. Are&lt;br&gt;they smartphones? If it has a nearly full sized keyboard, folds in half, a&lt;br&gt;battery, and can rest on your lap, I'm pretty sure that makes it a laptop.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:47:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unboxing the Asus UL20A 12.1 inch laptop</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/unboxing-the-asus-ul20a-12-1-inch-laptop.html#comment-22536714</link><description>You know what? I hadn't even noticed that, but you're right. It doesn't. The&lt;br&gt;UL30A does, but not the UL20A.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:25:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unboxing the Asus UL20A 12.1 inch laptop</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/unboxing-the-asus-ul20a-12-1-inch-laptop.html#comment-22535550</link><description>But the UL30A also had more RAM than the UL20A... I'll be posting benchmarks&lt;br&gt;for the UL20A soon so we'll have another comparison point.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:00:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unboxing the Asus UL20A 12.1 inch laptop</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/unboxing-the-asus-ul20a-12-1-inch-laptop.html#comment-22535526</link><description>I haven't had a chance to test the SU4100 yet, but as you can see in my Acer&lt;br&gt;Aspire 1410 and Asus UL30A reviews, the SU7300 does appear to outperform the&lt;br&gt;Intel Celeron SU2300 processor, which appears to be one of the cheapest dual&lt;br&gt;core CULV processors available.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:59:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Acer Aspire 1410 review (dual core version)</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/acer-aspire-1410-review-dual-core-version.html#comment-22532556</link><description>Actually, I have two points to make: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Netbooks *are* laptops, and if you read my reviews of other machines you'll see that I frequently use the words interchangeably.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. I've always drawn the line between netbook and non-netbook at screen size. In order to be a netbook it needs to meet several criteria. It needs to have a 10.2 inch or smaller display, weigh about 3.5 pounds or less, and cost around $500 or less (although this price has dropped a lot in the last few years, so that I might think about revising it to $400 or less).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's never been about the processor. The first OLPC had an AMD Geode processor, but it's still a netbook. The first Eee PC had an Intel Celeron processor: still a netbook. And there are plenty of machines with VIA C7-M or VIA Nano processors. They're netbooks too, as long as they're small, light, and cheap. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've also never called the Sony Vaio P a netbook, because it doesn't meet all the criteria either. It's small, light, but expensive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the end, it's all semantics though. It doesn't matter what you call these devices. They're all changing the way we think about computer price, size, and performance.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:39:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fujitsu introduces LifeBook P3110 thin and light 11.6 inch laptop</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/fujitsu-introduces-lifebook-p3110-thin-and-light-11-6-inch-laptop.html#comment-22477732</link><description>&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bob" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bob&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:24:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Acer Aspire 1410 review (dual core version)</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/acer-aspire-1410-review-dual-core-version.html#comment-22240914</link><description>As far as I can tell the only difference between the Acer and Gateway models&lt;br&gt;is the branding.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:29:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sony figures out a way to charge even more for the Vaio P</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/06/sony-figures-out-a-way-to-charge-even-more-for-the-vaio-p.html#comment-22144904</link><description>sorry, that was a typo... it should have read 256GB.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:55:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First look at the Zune HD with NVIDIA Tegra &amp;#8211; Video</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/first-look-at-the-zune-hd-with-nvidia-tegra-video.html#comment-22039921</link><description>It's on hold for the moment, but Gizmodo put together a nice roundup&lt;br&gt;yesterday:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397986/hd-media-player-battlemodo-apple-tv-killers" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://gizmodo.com/5397986/hd-media-player-batt...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:23:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First look at the Zune HD with NVIDIA Tegra &amp;#8211; Video</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/first-look-at-the-zune-hd-with-nvidia-tegra-video.html#comment-22029086</link><description>The main appeal of HD video on a tiny device is the fact that you don't need&lt;br&gt;to convert your video collection to watch it. As I mentioned, I have dozens&lt;br&gt;of TV shows I've recorded with a high definition TV tuner. It would be nice&lt;br&gt;to be able to sync them with a portable device without having to transcode&lt;br&gt;them into a different format with a lower resolution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately, since I've been using DiVX as my compression format of&lt;br&gt;choice, I'll still need to transcode my old videos if I want to watch them&lt;br&gt;on the ZuneHD. But I just configured my media center software to start using&lt;br&gt;H.264 instead so all future recordings should sync up perfectly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:29:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First look at the Zune HD with NVIDIA Tegra &amp;#8211; Video</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/first-look-at-the-zune-hd-with-nvidia-tegra-video.html#comment-22005941</link><description>Heh, I stand corrected. I had no idea HP was still making these. Good for&lt;br&gt;them!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:07:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CLEAR holds Philly launch event for citywide 4G WiMAX network</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/clear-holds-philly-launch-event-for-citywide-4g-wimax-network.html#comment-22002093</link><description>Not last time I checked.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:59:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Benchmarking the Asus UL30A (and other PCs)</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/benchmarking-the-asus-ul30a-and-other-pcs.html#comment-21938369</link><description>Sounds reasonable. Or you could just give the range.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:33:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Benchmarking the Asus UL30A (and other PCs)</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/benchmarking-the-asus-ul30a-and-other-pcs.html#comment-21938071</link><description>I just ran it again and got 1:03. It looks like my model might have a faster&lt;br&gt;hard drive than yours.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:27:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Benchmarking the Asus UL30A (and other PCs)</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/benchmarking-the-asus-ul30a-and-other-pcs.html#comment-21936621</link><description>Yeah, I figured ZIP is probably a more common file format, and I just like&lt;br&gt;the 7-zip user interface better than the Windows utility. Basically I picked&lt;br&gt;these CPU and HDD stress tests because they represent things I'm likely to&lt;br&gt;actually do with a PC.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:00:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Benchmarking the Asus UL30A (and other PCs)</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/benchmarking-the-asus-ul30a-and-other-pcs.html#comment-21935279</link><description>Hmm... that's odd. I did the same test on the new dual core 1410 and got&lt;br&gt;0:55 for folder copy (2186 files totaling 478MB) and 1:38 for the zip test&lt;br&gt;(2186 files, the ZIP file is 453MB).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did you use 7-zip to zip the folders, and did you use the ZIP settings&lt;br&gt;instead of the 7z setting?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was shocked by the 10 second folder copy on the UL30A, but that's honestly&lt;br&gt;what happened.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:25:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quickies: Hackintosh future is bright, Eee PC turns 2</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/quickies-hackintosh-future-is-bright-eee-pc-turns-2.html#comment-21911382</link><description>That's why I said the Eee PC was the first consumer oriented netbook. The XO&lt;br&gt;was definitely the inspiration, but the Eee PC was the first device of its&lt;br&gt;kind that you could walk into a store and buy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:07:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Toshiba Mini NB205-N330 review</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/toshiba-mini-nb205-n330-review.html#comment-21826025</link><description>Oh, and FYI my 7:09 battery test result was from leaving the computer on&lt;br&gt;non-stop with light web browsing, some image editing, and you know, the&lt;br&gt;stuff you do when you're blogging. I think I watched one YouTube video for&lt;br&gt;about 2 minutes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:26:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Toshiba Mini NB205-N330 review</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/toshiba-mini-nb205-n330-review.html#comment-21825965</link><description>That's interesting. I think there were actually a couple of other apps that&lt;br&gt;I didn't bother mentioning. I'll see if I can get you a complete list before&lt;br&gt;I return the laptop.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:24:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 + netbooks = lower battery life?</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html#comment-21386067</link><description>As I've mentioned in the past, I have pretty much given up on Battery Eater&lt;br&gt;as a test of real-world performance, but I wanted to run it in these two&lt;br&gt;cases to compare my results with others'.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But when I publish a more detailed review on the Win7 Eee PC 1008HA I expect&lt;br&gt;to have more real-world results for the battery performance section.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:53:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A tale of three notebook sizes</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/a-tale-of-three-notebook-sizes.html#comment-21385393</link><description>And one day... the computers will learn to walk upright....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:47:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Acer Aspire 1410 dual core unboxing and first look &amp;#8211; Video</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/acer-aspire-1410-dual-core-unboxing-and-first-look-video.html#comment-21380074</link><description>You're right. It looks like Acer lowered the hard drive capacity when&lt;br&gt;switching processors. The original Core 2 Solo version had a 250GB hard&lt;br&gt;drive, but the new model has a 160GB hard drive. I'll update the&lt;br&gt;description.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:25:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Now in the product database: 12 inch and smaller laptops</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/now-in-the-product-database-12-inch-and-smaller-laptops.html#comment-21379959</link><description>Not that I'm aware of, which is one of the reasons I've started covering&lt;br&gt;low-end all-in-ones. But if you find a good site, let me know!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:24:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Acer Aspire 1410 dual core unboxing and first look &amp;#8211; Video</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/acer-aspire-1410-dual-core-unboxing-and-first-look-video.html#comment-21378208</link><description>The keyboard is identical to the one I reviewed here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.liliputing.com/2009/09/acer-aspire-1410-review.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.liliputing.com/2009/09/acer-aspire-1...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradlinder</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:04:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>