<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jbrotherlove</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/jbrotherlove/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:19:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: BET Awards Dominate Twitter, Causes Racist Backlash</title><link>http://blackweb20.disqus.com/bet_awards_dominate_twitter_causes_racist_backlash/#comment-11903438</link><description>That's odd. I started to comment here and &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/KmT71" rel="nofollow"&gt;ended up writing a post&lt;/a&gt; instead. I thought it would trackback to here. But I don't see it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jbrotherlove</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:19:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pardon Our Dust, We&amp;#8217;re in the Cloud</title><link>http://blackweb20.disqus.com/pardon_our_dust_we8217re_in_the_cloud/#comment-10275836</link><description>After logging into Disqus, it returns me to the comments and asks me to "Register with DISQUS". I have to fill out "Guest" each time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jbrotherlove</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:47:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Twitter Goes Down</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/when_twitter_goes_down/#comment-9164240</link><description>I saw the planned downtime and planned for it. Unfortunately, API connections seemed to fail before the schedule start of maintenance; that caused some scheduled tweets for my client to stall, then bulk publish when Twitter came back up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interestingly, I popped over to FriendFeed to see what people were sharing Friday and they were down as well. Not a good day for micropublishing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jbrotherlove</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 16:09:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Advertising and Trust</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/advertising_and_trust/#comment-8530832</link><description>Bravo, Chris. People will always have something negative to say about how you run your life and business. You handled the sponsored gig in the best way possible. Sure, in a perfect world, we all could do what we loved without caring about money. But as you stated "Someone always pays for the meal."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jbrotherlove</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:18:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Gets Pimped and Why You Should Care</title><link>http://blackweb20.disqus.com/google_gets_pimped_and_why_you_should_care/#comment-5152848</link><description>The themes in GMail are "neat", I suppose. But that's not why I use GMail. I'd be much more impressed if Google were to do something with &lt;a href="http://www.jaiku.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Jaiku&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.grandcentral.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;GrandCentral&lt;/a&gt;. There haven't been updates on either one of those projects in ages. I wish Google would quit acquiring services if they're not committed to developing them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jbrotherlove</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:48:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guest Post- How to Keep Your Conversations From Turning Into Broadcasts</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/guest_post_how_to_keep_your_conversations_from_turning_into_broadcasts/#comment-8527380</link><description>Thanks for this post. This is exactly what I've been trying to communicate at social meetups. There are quite a few marketers, consultants and "experts" who are taking the broadcast/advertising route without really engaging their audience.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jbrotherlove</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:55:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dead Mail Department</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/the_dead_mail_department_42/#comment-1700409</link><description>Once you are dead, you really don't know if the emails are going out. So you would have to use a service that will stay around long enough. Or if someone writes an app that automatically sends it out for you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Imagine the trail of "you did this..." and the "i always loved you, sorry for not showing it" emails. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;could be interesting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ophelia_chong</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:32:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dead Mail Department</title><link>http://sbspalding.disqus.com/the_dead_mail_department_42/#comment-1700281</link><description>Ha! I'm surprised this doesn't already exist, to be honest. Also, I'm thinking we'd each need some sort of email executor to carry out our wishes. You know, with us being dead and all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">j. brotherlove</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:24:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kind Kisses: Friends with Benefits</title><link>http://funkybrownchick.disqus.com/kind_kisses_friends_with_benefits/#comment-7205337</link><description>I run into this conundrum a lot. Ultimately, I want a steady guy. But it takes a lot of patience and weeding through the knuckleheads just to get someone who knows what they want AND can communicate it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I resort to the fuck buddy situation. But I haven't been hugely successful at it. I often find the other dude (after about 2-3 sex sessions) acting like we're more than just bumping uglies. Frustrating!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As soon as I see signs of it, I cut them off. Although, some of them still have vague Fatal Attraction tendencies. I admire people who can walk that tightrope indefinitely.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">j. brotherlove</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:21:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who Needs the Clintons?</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/who_needs_the_clintons/#comment-776700</link><description>I'm not surprised by the awkwardness. Both candidates wanted to win. But Clinton &lt;em&gt;expected&lt;/em&gt; to get the Democratic nomination. She has to be a bit salty about losing to someone who (in her opinion and &lt;em&gt;many&lt;/em&gt; other voters) isn't completely qualified to be President.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe there are a lot of things Obama could learn from the Clintons (disregarding that much political experience is foolish). However, mending the rift and gaining support amongst voter populations Obama hasn't sufficiently penetrated is paramount if he hopes to defeat McClain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jbrotherlove</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:46:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: QOTD: Usher Says...</title><link>http://lynnedjohnson.disqus.com/qotd_usher_says/#comment-737073</link><description>I agree with Camille; sounds like some mess to me. And really, Usher should know better. I'm tired of the "man-stands-by-his obligation" stance as well. How romantic is that? So people should marry people out of &lt;em&gt;obligation&lt;/em&gt;? No wonder divorce is so high.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jbrotherlove</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:16:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sing Along / 7 Songs Meme</title><link>http://lynnedjohnson.disqus.com/sing_along_7_songs_meme/#comment-730457</link><description>Funny how a lot of us have a N*E*R*D track on our list. Sounds like you're getting your party on this summer! I'm digging the Kid Cudi cut. Gota check him out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jbrotherlove</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:58:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Le Matin après le Ménage à trois</title><link>http://funkybrownchick.disqus.com/le_matin_apres_le_menage_a_trois/#comment-7204870</link><description>People and their judgments can suck it. The biggest &lt;em&gt;gotcha&lt;/em&gt; is I constantly discover "scandalous" information about the very people who judge me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People sit on so many secrets that I think there is some jealousy when they find others who don't feel like they have to hide their complexities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There isn't anything wrong with you. You're an open-minded, go-getter who isn't afraid to share the truth about your life. I'd love to clone you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jbrotherlove</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:06:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Funky Brown Chick Got Her Groove Back</title><link>http://funkybrownchick.disqus.com/how_funky_brown_chick_got_her_groove_back/#comment-7204355</link><description>Ha ha. I misspelled my own damn name.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jbrotherlove</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 12:44:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Funky Brown Chick Got Her Groove Back</title><link>http://funkybrownchick.disqus.com/how_funky_brown_chick_got_her_groove_back/#comment-7204354</link><description>I'm all late (been off the Matrix) but my congrats are just as heartfelt! Work it out!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jbrotehrlove</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 12:40:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>