<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jake_awc</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/jake_awc/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:51:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/08/13/moreRandomStuff.html</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/thread_4077/#comment-1221785</link><description>The XML output links requires moderator access.  Do you have a link to an example or a screen shot perhaps?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jake_awc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:51:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain runs a cowardly sleazy ad, early (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/mccain_runs_a_cowardly_sleazy_ad_early_scripting_news/#comment-1066663</link><description>I just have to wonder what class of voter this appeals to.  I didn't see the race issue.  To me it looked like Obama, like Brittany or Paris, is famous for all the wrong reasons - child endangerment, porn, substance abuse... inability to sing.  I don't see the race issue at all.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Makes me think that if the originators had had race in mind it was probably to mess with the Obama camp.  Obama supporters would throw up race, they could point to the aforementioned "wrong reasons" and flip race on them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jake_awc</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:16:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Knol starting to smell spammy</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/google_knol_starting_to_smell_spammy/#comment-1041622</link><description>I'd guess a good majority of articles will probably be scraped from Wiki.  Would Wiki's license have allowed Knol to preload some of their data?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:50:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We won in Iraq, a long time ago (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/we_won_in_iraq_a_long_time_ago_scripting_news/#comment-967361</link><description>It's been a permathread here as well. &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/4qLctU" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://bit.ly/4qLctU&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:45:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We won in Iraq, a long time ago (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/we_won_in_iraq_a_long_time_ago_scripting_news/#comment-967307</link><description>Thom Hartmann did a write-up on it a couple years back:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://bit.ly/occupation" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://bit.ly/occupation&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:39:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>