<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for jackofallthumbs</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/jackofallthumbs/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:23:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Another Top Democrat Declines Burr Challenge -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/another_top_democrat_declines_burr_challenge_political_wire/#comment-22965581</link><description>Agreed. And the fewer challengers she has, the easier the general election will be. I suspect that someone leaned on Etheridge. 'Bout time the Dems got organized.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackofallthumbs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:23:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nothing to Hide -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/nothing_to_hide_political_wire/#comment-22769136</link><description>"Q: What's your party affiliation? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A: As far as the two-party political system goes, I swing both ways. But I'm leaning toward the Libertarian Party."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No, dear, you're thinking of the &lt;b&gt;Libertine&lt;/b&gt; party.  Altogether different.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gypc_dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:07:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nothing to Hide -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/nothing_to_hide_political_wire/#comment-22766480</link><description>Old news here. An Italian porn star ran for Parliament there in the 1970's and won. The sad irony is once in office her approach to the job was actually more serious than the current GOP gang today.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick12</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:24:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nothing to Hide -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/nothing_to_hide_political_wire/#comment-22765840</link><description>The sad part is that, of the two, Vitter is more shameless.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ShmaCantLogin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:15:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nothing to Hide -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/nothing_to_hide_political_wire/#comment-22765118</link><description>Q: Do you think you're more qualified than Senator Vitter?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A: Absolutely not. But in one movie, I did play a Secret Service agent marooned on an island controlled by North Korea. I butt heads with dictator Kim Jong-il and come out on top.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You gotta love this country,,,,,</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackofallthumbs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:04:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NY-23 Watch -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/ny_23_watch_political_wire/#comment-21827532</link><description>That's because they've decided since this summer that a GOP-comeback meme will sell more.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ThatOneDemocrat</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:02:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NY-23 Watch -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/ny_23_watch_political_wire/#comment-21827178</link><description>As a veteran of almost twenty (even-numbered) election nights, I confess that I was angered by the spin-meisters on CNN, who tried to turn likely Republican victories in 2 of 3 races into an anti-Obama referendum. Sad.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackofallthumbs</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:54:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Burr Faces Tough Re-Election in North Carolina -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/burr_faces_tough_re_election_in_north_carolina_political_wire_22/#comment-21361211</link><description>Amen. Did Colin Reid see the same poll that TG saw?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackofallthumbs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:41:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scalia says he'd likely have dissented in Brown v. Board, would have voted to keep schools desegregated</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/scalia_says_hed_likely_have_dissented_in_brown_v_board_would_have_voted_to_keep_schools_desegregated/#comment-21118623</link><description>I agree with BJB. The headline's busted.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackofallthumbs</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:27:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Former Fox News pundit: Glenn Beck &amp;#8216;way over the top,&amp;#8217; &amp;#8217;scary&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://rawstory.disqus.com/former_fox_news_pundit_glenn_beck_8216way_over_the_top8217_8217scary8217/#comment-21033101</link><description>There are simply too many accusations of "Liberal News/Liberal Media" that have been pushed for at least the last 30 years by one side.  The "bifurcation" is a result of the a number of things..."news" being forced to have "balance" regardless of facts in order to push a political agenda being number one among them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">twitter-17938843</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:20:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Former Fox News pundit: Glenn Beck &amp;#8216;way over the top,&amp;#8217; &amp;#8217;scary&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://rawstory.disqus.com/former_fox_news_pundit_glenn_beck_8216way_over_the_top8217_8217scary8217/#comment-21027837</link><description>Passion just plain passion.   We are sick and tired of being vilified by the right starting in the 1970s.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DownriverDem</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:32:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Former Fox News pundit: Glenn Beck &amp;#8216;way over the top,&amp;#8217; &amp;#8217;scary&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://rawstory.disqus.com/former_fox_news_pundit_glenn_beck_8216way_over_the_top8217_8217scary8217/#comment-21013710</link><description>But it's so appropriate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">disappointed voter</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:52:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Former Fox News pundit: Glenn Beck &amp;#8216;way over the top,&amp;#8217; &amp;#8217;scary&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://rawstory.disqus.com/former_fox_news_pundit_glenn_beck_8216way_over_the_top8217_8217scary8217/#comment-21008933</link><description>obviously you dont read raw story comments very much. unless you use at least two of carlin's 7 dirty words to insult someone, you are a 'right wing zionist pig' who loves dick cheney and fox news.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">decora</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:19:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Former Fox News pundit: Glenn Beck &amp;#8216;way over the top,&amp;#8217; &amp;#8217;scary&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://rawstory.disqus.com/former_fox_news_pundit_glenn_beck_8216way_over_the_top8217_8217scary8217/#comment-21005267</link><description>spelling with half a set of blocks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ProudPrimate</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:03:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Former Fox News pundit: Glenn Beck &amp;#8216;way over the top,&amp;#8217; &amp;#8217;scary&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://rawstory.disqus.com/former_fox_news_pundit_glenn_beck_8216way_over_the_top8217_8217scary8217/#comment-21001978</link><description>Jeez, can either side post a comment on the issue of the bifurcation of news coverage, without using 'idiot' or 'cocksucker'? Pathetic.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackofallthumbs</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:01:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rush Limbaugh tells female CNN correspondent to get f----- by a fire hydrant to improve her day</title><link>http://americablog.disqus.com/rush_limbaugh_tells_female_cnn_correspondent_to_get_f_by_a_fire_hydrant_to_improve_her_day/#comment-20600070</link><description>John,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Being older than you, I'm probably even more familiar with the expression, so I understood the intent. But the headline is misleading, a trait I'd prefer be associated with the other side rather than our own. If 'sitting on a fire hydrant' is so obvious (and it is) then what's the problem with using that as the headline? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the up side: you are now a nationally recognized voice. I for one am very pleased with that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the down side: if you don't bring your A game every damn time, it reflects badly on the good you have done.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackofallthumbs</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:11:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain Seeks to Remake Republican Party -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/mccain_seeks_to_remake_republican_party_political_wire/#comment-18366307</link><description>Good statement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was thinking the only hope they had was for the conservatives or far right to start their own party which would free the Moderates and Independents to be Republican's or Centrist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Either way you're right, they have to pull their weeds if they want a their grass (party) to grow.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Soapm</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:58:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain Seeks to Remake Republican Party -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/mccain_seeks_to_remake_republican_party_political_wire/#comment-18296045</link><description>Agreement entire. Much as I want the Democrats to have a big advantage, I don't want a significant part of the population brainwashed into radical militancy by the Big Lie that I predict the other side will use more and more as their power slips away (sort of the political equivalent of guerrilla warfare: if you're losing badly, fight as dirty as you like and ignore all consequences).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Meffy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:11:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chicago Not Chosen for Olympics -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/chicago_not_chosen_for_olympics_political_wire/#comment-18295428</link><description>I agree. By that silly standard, every head of state who attended except the one of the final host country 'miscalculated'. It cost him three hours out of his 'day job'. Hardly a weekend of brush-cutting by the former occupant.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackofallthumbs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:06:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain Seeks to Remake Republican Party -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/mccain_seeks_to_remake_republican_party_political_wire/#comment-18290569</link><description>I would worry much less about haltiing their decline, except that a lot of the current reform effort is dependent on a charismatic president. If the out of control rhetoric continues and some wing-nut deprives our country of him, our world will change even more than after 9-11.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackofallthumbs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:59:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain Seeks to Remake Republican Party -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/mccain_seeks_to_remake_republican_party_political_wire/#comment-18286578</link><description>I hope either someone -- anyone -- with some sense will start bringing the Republican back from the lunatic fringe, or that their lemming-march into the abyss of extremism will pick up steam. The present fragmented, inchoate state of the party is leading to some of the ugliest politics I've seen since the days of Nixon.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Meffy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:51:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain Seeks to Remake Republican Party -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/mccain_seeks_to_remake_republican_party_political_wire/#comment-18285264</link><description>Indeed. I think that for this strategy to work, at least a half dozen Republicans with some degree of gravitas need to privately map out a strategy, and then repeatedly denounce the excesses of the party in no uncertain terms.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackofallthumbs</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:18:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reid Says Final Bill Will Have Public Option -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/reid_says_final_bill_will_have_public_option_political_wire_47/#comment-18172816</link><description>I believe they have. Perhaps they're even willing to call the Republicans' bluff and let them filibuster the bill. Because if the voters see the Republicans on camera day after day, reading the phone book instead of addressing health care, they would truly vote the party into oblivion. Crass as the Republican leaders are, they're not that stupid. They're bluffing, and health industry friendly Dems like Baucus know it but are using the filibuster as an excuse to kill a public option.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackofallthumbs</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:29:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Dangerous Environment -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/a_dangerous_environment_political_wire/#comment-17858349</link><description>What do we suggest? Simple. Speech that encourages the violent overthrow of our elected government or that can be interpreted as promoting harm to our leaders is illegal. It always has been. So, people that run 'assassination polls' on Facebook, wear assault rifles to Obama events, carry signs about 'watering the tree of liberty' or 'I got your trigger right here' all need to be hauled in and interviewed at the least.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackofallthumbs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:45:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Exactly Fair and Balanced -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/not_exactly_fair_and_balanced_political_wire/#comment-17048170</link><description>That sound you hear is Walter Cronkite spinning like a top.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jackofallthumbs</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:07:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>