<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for iqwirty</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-626ca9bc" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/iqwirty/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 09:44:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: TumblrFlav - Pedestrian strips</title><link>http://flapic.tumblr.com/post/63358144#comment-4235255</link><description>Nice photo - makes me think of an Alien Airport.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iqwirty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 09:44:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling the Presidency</title><link>http://www.opticality.com/blog/2008/10/19/selling-the-presidency/#comment-3621637</link><description>I've never thought it made sense for candidates to create ads whose subject is their opponent.  And, yes - I would support a law which forbids it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What other industry flourishes on indirect ads, the way that politics does?  Sure, there's the Mac and PC thing.  But generally if a seller spends all his time pointing at the competition, the seller seems like a whiney complainer who doesn't have anything worthwhile to actually sell.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iqwirty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 08:19:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>