<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for hogganbeck</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/hogganbeck/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/hogganbeck/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:16:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Polling Medicare - Business - The Atlantic</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/03/polling-medicare/37599/#comment-40175819</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why do we have to go back to the 1960's to talk about this stuff?  Yes, I get the point that yesterday's mild controversies are today's settled policy.  But today's settled policy is the scary part.  The thinking of 1962 did not include everything we now know about these kind of programs.  We have had a long time to witness a build up of various fairness adjustments and unanticipated costs undermine the viability of the program itself.  What the participants in those polls didn't know about Medicare has filled shelves of books.  I don't read Klein unless pointed to him, but if the last couple of days are any indication, debating health care with him must be like debating science fiction with a Star Trek geek.  That is, filled with arcane musings over things that don't exist.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hogganbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:16:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Commonwealth:  If We Had Lowered Costs, Costs Would Be Lower - Business - The Atlantic</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/03/commonwealth-if-we-had-lowered-costs-costs-would-be-lower/37562/#comment-40103091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure how the slight mitigation of a disaster accumulates as an actual benefit.  Does the mitigation compound over time to result in something only mostly disastrous? Is that like mostly dead?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hogganbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:15:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Worst sentence ever written in journalism?</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2009/02/worst-sentence-ever-written-in-journalism/4685#comment-36776265</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's all a great big clause salad, but this bothers me particularly:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'...House Democrats basically told administration officials, “I told you so.”'&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It feels exactly like the kind of blog-writing that an editorial standards advocate would hate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hogganbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 14:14:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cooler</title><link>http://e168f08.plugh.org/cooler/#comment-4397983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ran across an interesting talk about memcached here:  &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=39391378919" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=39391378919"&gt;http://www.facebook.com/not...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This gets a bit in-depth, but it is a description of how Facebook is making use of, and modifying, memcached and the considerations in scaling Web 2.0 applications.  There seem to be a lot of people out there using ROR to build applications for Facebook.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hogganbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:52:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Final Project: Tips for the Writeup and Features</title><link>http://e168f08.plugh.org/assignments/final-project-tips-for-the-writeup-and-features/#comment-4280333</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.  That must be some of that fancy Rails magic I keep hearing about.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hogganbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 22:28:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Final Project: Tips for the Writeup and Features</title><link>http://e168f08.plugh.org/assignments/final-project-tips-for-the-writeup-and-features/#comment-4278243</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"If you are adapting Assignment 5 for the final project, you may only use one self-defined feature."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm guessing that's from last year?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hogganbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:58:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cooler</title><link>http://e168f08.plugh.org/cooler/#comment-4064728</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fantastic.  It works!  Thx.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hogganbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:51:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cooler</title><link>http://e168f08.plugh.org/cooler/#comment-4064406</link><description>&lt;p&gt;John:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At one point, you used a button in your GUI file window that brought up Terminal already cd'd to that particular directory.  What was that?  My wrists hurt.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hogganbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:58:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Syllabus</title><link>http://e168f08.plugh.org/syllabus/#comment-2577709</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good enough(I just reread that and it sounded kind-of not nice when it was intended just as conversational...sorry).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I just used './', but that's just Unix-specific, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hogganbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:44:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Syllabus</title><link>http://e168f08.plugh.org/syllabus/#comment-2577005</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Reading for Sept 24.  Going through the code in the Ruby text...p  78 in the pdf version.  The code calls on the method 'require_relative', which is not part of the base until 1.9(I'm running 1.86).  I get an 'undefined method' error.  My guess is that just using 'require' and the full path to the file will make it work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hogganbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:03:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cooler</title><link>http://e168f08.plugh.org/cooler/#comment-2434736</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Python:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;print "Hello, world. " * 10&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hogganbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:32:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Assignment 0</title><link>http://e168f08.plugh.org/assignments/assignment-0/#comment-2409665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's Dave, actually.&lt;br&gt;I may be off the map for what the book says.  I haven't bought it yet, and I don't want to mislead anyone.  But I think a pretty solid overall point to make is that Gems gets updated first.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Step 1 is actually making sure that XCode is installed on your system.  That sets you up with Rails 1.2.6 and Gems 1.0.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I didn't realize that Gems had a flag for self-updating.  What I did was per the &lt;a href="http://www.rubyonrails.org/down" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.rubyonrails.org/down"&gt;ruby on rails download page.&lt;/a&gt;.  Instead of updating Rails first, I went to the link for &lt;a href="http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/38647/rubygems-1.2.0.zip" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/38647/rubygems-1.2.0.zip"&gt;downloading Gems&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then I used Gems to update Rails.  In Terminal type "gem update rails".  Gems is pretty key because its the package manager.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hogganbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:37:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Assignment 0</title><link>http://e168f08.plugh.org/assignments/assignment-0/#comment-2408485</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For those who are doing this in OSX 10.5, make sure you update Gems before you use it to update Rails.  If you don't use the updated version of Gems to execute 'gem update rails', it doesn't seem to know which version it has and you will end up with two versions of rails and some broken links in whatever system variables Rails is using to know which version it is.  The rails website leads you to believe that you should run 'gem update rails' as the first step then run the setup.rb script to update gems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you do go down this path, run 'gem uninstall rails' and pick the latest version.  Then use the newly installed Gems to re-run 'gem update rails'.  After that, everything should work OK.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At least, that has been my experience. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hogganbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:03:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The vapidity of cable news, part 1 in an ongoing series</title><link>http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2008/05/the-vapidity-of-cable-news-part-1-in-an-ongoing-series/3389/#comment-36664907</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Do not attempt to replace the beer with Zima or wine coolers, however. These are known to cause your IQ to drop by 30 points.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I always secretly liked Zima.  This explains a lot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hogganbeck</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:07:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>