<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of hewhocutsdown</title><link>http://disqus.com/by/hewhocutsdown/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://disqus.com/hewhocutsdown/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:00:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Leaving the Faith Undefended</title><link>(u'http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/2008/07/23/leaving-the-faith-undefended/',%20988297L)#comment-988297</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with much of what you've written -- truly, the "overreactions" of Christians have been a huge hindrance to the Gospel's spread.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, where does that leave the field of apologetics? Do you see any difference between apologetics and "defending the faith"? Do you see apologetics (e.g., the writings of C.S. Lewis, G.K. Chesterton, and even N.T. Wright) as a waste of time? And how would you interpret verses such as 1 Peter 3:15-16, which seem to imply that we should have some kind of response when people want to know why we believe what we believe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:27:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leaving the Faith Undefended</title><link>(u'http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/2008/07/23/leaving-the-faith-undefended/',%20993959L)#comment-993959</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the clarification. I thought that's probably what you meant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">opus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:00:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>