<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for giltotherescue</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-593fd677" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/giltotherescue/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:53:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter-storm: Blaine leaves, blame flies</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/04/23/twitter-storm-blaine-leaves-blame-flies/#comment-372575</link><description>although i'd like to stick up for another architect, twitter is a really simple web service. it succeeded because it's a great idea, not because of brilliant engineering.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the reasons for twitter's scaling problems are irrelevant. an architect's main job responsibility is to design a solid, stable infrastructure, and i don't have a problem holding him accountable for a failure in that department. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;all that said, there's no reason this should be such a loud conversation. i haven't read the arrington post referenced above and don't plan on it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">giltotherescue</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:53:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>