<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for gargouri2001</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/gargouri2001/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:58:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Video: Windows 7 Task Bar</title><link>http://awv.disqus.com/video_windows_7_task_bar/#comment-4487106</link><description>I just saw this comparison between windows Xp and windows 7 (&lt;a href="http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-7264-view-windows-7-vs-windows-xp-review.html" title="windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark" rel="nofollow"&gt;windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark&lt;/a&gt;) , look like the new windows has a better memory bandwidth and faster processor cache .&lt;br&gt;Too bad the HDD and 3 D performance was worse than in windows Xp , I hope that as the writer wrote that those issues will be fixed with new driver .&lt;br&gt;Note also the memory usage under windows 7 is also a lot lower than under windows vista the number of process was also reduced to 35 only . I hope that microsoft will come finally with some good OS .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:58:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7: I couldn&amp;#8217;t care less</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/windows_7_i_couldn8217t_care_less_89/#comment-4487110</link><description>I just saw this comparison between windows Xp and windows 7 (&lt;a href="http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-7264-view-windows-7-vs-windows-xp-review.html" title="windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark" rel="nofollow"&gt;windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark&lt;/a&gt;) , look like the new windows has a better memory bandwidth and faster processor cache .&lt;br&gt;Too bad the HDD and 3 D performance was worse than in windows Xp , I hope that as the writer wrote that those issues will be fixed with new driver .&lt;br&gt;Note also the memory usage under windows 7 is also a lot lower than under windows vista the number of process was also reduced to 35 only . I hope that microsoft will come finally with some good OS .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:57:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dumb Web 2.0 names. And Windows 7.</title><link>http://themoderatevoice.disqus.com/dumb_web_20_names_and_windows_7/#comment-4487109</link><description>I just saw this comparison between windows Xp and windows 7 (&lt;a href="http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-7264-view-windows-7-vs-windows-xp-review.html" title="windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark" rel="nofollow"&gt;windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark&lt;/a&gt;) , look like the new windows has a better memory bandwidth and faster processor cache .&lt;br&gt;Too bad the HDD and 3 D performance was worse than in windows Xp , I hope that as the writer wrote that those issues will be fixed with new driver .&lt;br&gt;Note also the memory usage under windows 7 is also a lot lower than under windows vista the number of process was also reduced to 35 only . I hope that microsoft will come finally with some good OS .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:57:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some bloggers are Hyping Windows 7 operating System.</title><link>http://tech-linkblog.disqus.com/some_bloggers_are_hyping_windows_7_operating_system/#comment-4487065</link><description>I just saw this comparison between windows Xp and windows 7 (&lt;a href="http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-7264-view-windows-7-vs-windows-xp-review.html" title="windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark" rel="nofollow"&gt;windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark&lt;/a&gt;) , look like the new windows has a better memory bandwidth and faster processor cache .&lt;br&gt;Too bad the HDD and 3 D performance was worse than in windows Xp , I hope that as the writer wrote that those issues will be fixed with new driver .&lt;br&gt;Note also the memory usage under windows 7 is also a lot lower than under windows vista the number of process was also reduced to 35 only . I hope that microsoft will come finally with some good OS .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:56:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Engineering blog up</title><link>http://krunker.disqus.com/windows_7_engineering_blog_up/#comment-4487063</link><description>I just saw this comparison between windows Xp and windows 7 (&lt;a href="http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-7264-view-windows-7-vs-windows-xp-review.html" title="windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark" rel="nofollow"&gt;windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark&lt;/a&gt;) , look like the new windows has a better memory bandwidth and faster processor cache .&lt;br&gt;Too bad the HDD and 3 D performance was worse than in windows Xp , I hope that as the writer wrote that those issues will be fixed with new driver .&lt;br&gt;Note also the memory usage under windows 7 is also a lot lower than under windows vista the number of process was also reduced to 35 only . I hope that microsoft will come finally with some good OS .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:56:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 - First Look</title><link>http://sociableblog.disqus.com/windows_7_first_look/#comment-4487080</link><description>I just saw this comparison between windows Xp and windows 7 (&lt;a href="http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-7264-view-windows-7-vs-windows-xp-review.html" title="windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark" rel="nofollow"&gt;windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark&lt;/a&gt;) , look like the new windows has a better memory bandwidth and faster processor cache .&lt;br&gt;Too bad the HDD and 3 D performance was worse than in windows Xp , I hope that as the writer wrote that those issues will be fixed with new driver .&lt;br&gt;Note also the memory usage under windows 7 is also a lot lower than under windows vista the number of process was also reduced to 35 only . I hope that microsoft will come finally with some good OS .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:56:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 allows DirectX 10 acceleration on the CPU</title><link>http://seriousgames.disqus.com/windows_7_allows_directx_10_acceleration_on_the_cpu/#comment-4487077</link><description>I just saw this comparison between windows Xp and windows 7 (&lt;a href="http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-7264-view-windows-7-vs-windows-xp-review.html" title="windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark" rel="nofollow"&gt;windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark&lt;/a&gt;) , look like the new windows has a better memory bandwidth and faster processor cache .&lt;br&gt;Too bad the HDD and 3 D performance was worse than in windows Xp , I hope that as the writer wrote that those issues will be fixed with new driver .&lt;br&gt;Note also the memory usage under windows 7 is also a lot lower than under windows vista the number of process was also reduced to 35 only . I hope that microsoft will come finally with some good OS .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:56:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 Server == Windows Server 2008 R2</title><link>http://fosketts.disqus.com/windows_7_server_windows_server_2008_r2/#comment-4487066</link><description>I just saw this comparison between windows Xp and windows 7 (&lt;a href="http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-7264-view-windows-7-vs-windows-xp-review.html" title="windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark" rel="nofollow"&gt;windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark&lt;/a&gt;) , look like the new windows has a better memory bandwidth and faster processor cache .&lt;br&gt;Too bad the HDD and 3 D performance was worse than in windows Xp , I hope that as the writer wrote that those issues will be fixed with new driver .&lt;br&gt;Note also the memory usage under windows 7 is also a lot lower than under windows vista the number of process was also reduced to 35 only . I hope that microsoft will come finally with some good OS .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:55:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 sees the light</title><link>http://shootingatbubbles.disqus.com/windows_7_sees_the_light/#comment-4487050</link><description>I just saw this comparison between windows Xp and windows 7 (&lt;a href="http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-7264-view-windows-7-vs-windows-xp-review.html" title="windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark" rel="nofollow"&gt;windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark&lt;/a&gt;) , look like the new windows has a better memory bandwidth and faster processor cache .&lt;br&gt;Too bad the HDD and 3 D performance was worse than in windows Xp , I hope that as the writer wrote that those issues will be fixed with new driver .&lt;br&gt;Note also the memory usage under windows 7 is also a lot lower than under windows vista the number of process was also reduced to 35 only . I hope that microsoft will come finally with some good OS .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:55:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OCZ Throttle eSATA Drive</title><link>http://ubergizmo.disqus.com/ocz_throttle_esata_drive/#comment-4306754</link><description>Those drive are also cheap enough ,&lt;br&gt;    * OCZESATATHR8G (8 GB) - &amp;gt; $30;&lt;br&gt;    * OCZESATATHR16G (16 GB) - &amp;gt; $50;&lt;br&gt;    * OCZESATATHR32G (32 GB) - &amp;gt; $85. &lt;br&gt;source :&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-7217-view-OCZ-throttle-drive-low-in-price-high-in-speed.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-7217-view-OCZ...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:13:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another web host review/help site</title><link>http://techburgh.disqus.com/thread_15/#comment-4246969</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Personally, i am using this &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" title="free image hosting" rel="nofollow"&gt;free image hosting&lt;/a&gt; services, and I am very happy with the result , First, i had some small business to do in EBay , i tried two paid image service and the result was very bad due to the lack of support and script incapability . After wasting my money, i switched to some free image hosting and the result was good , personal i found that &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;xtupload&lt;/a&gt; has a good support and a complete script which more than enough for my need , later a friend told me about PhotoBucket which was also great , but I hate to be limited in my usage (25 GB per month ) , in theory this more than enough but i preferred to stay with my old host .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now I will recommend to any one those Hosts : 1 ) &lt;a href="http://www.photobucket.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;PhotoBucket&lt;/a&gt; (good bandwidth and high script capability ) 2) &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Xtupload&lt;/a&gt; (unlimited bandwidth disk space and good script capability) 3) &lt;a href="http://imageshack.us/" rel="nofollow"&gt;image hack us&lt;/a&gt; for moderate use .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do not waste your money , I will never pay anymore for any paid image hosting service (a was setting a waiting for a week in order to get reply from paid service , and almost instantly I got a reply from a free one pretty pathetic but this is the reality)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:57:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Image/File Hosting</title><link>http://xxdesmus.disqus.com/free_imagefile_hosting/#comment-4246835</link><description>nice post</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:34:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Image/File Hosting</title><link>http://xxdesmus.disqus.com/free_imagefile_hosting/#comment-4246827</link><description>Personally, i am using this &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" title="free image hosting" rel="nofollow"&gt;free image hosting&lt;/a&gt; services, and I am very happy with the result , First, i had some small business to do in EBay , i tried two paid image service and the result was very bad due to the lack of support and script incapability . After wasting my money, i switched to some free image hosting and the result was good , personal i found that &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;xtupload&lt;/a&gt; has a good support and a complete script which more than enough for my need , later a friend told me about PhotoBucket which was also great , but I hate to be limited in my usage (25 GB per month ) , in theory this more than enough but i preferred to stay with my old host .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now I will recommend to any one those Hosts : 1 ) &lt;a href="http://www.photobucket.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;PhotoBucket&lt;/a&gt; (good bandwidth and high script capability ) 2) &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Xtupload&lt;/a&gt; (unlimited bandwidth disk space and good script capability) 3) &lt;a href="http://imageshack.us/" rel="nofollow"&gt;image hack us&lt;/a&gt; for moderate use .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do not waste your money , I will never pay anymore for any paid image hosting service (a was setting a waiting for a week in order to get reply from paid service , and almost instantly I got a reply from a free one pretty pathetic but this is the reality)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:34:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Web Hosting Update</title><link>http://androidworkshop.disqus.com/web_hosting_update/#comment-4246819</link><description>nice post</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:33:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nilo's Bar</title><link>http://nilo.disqus.com/nilos_bar_21/#comment-4246759</link><description>Personally, i am using this &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" title="free image hosting" rel="nofollow"&gt;free image hosting&lt;/a&gt; services, and I am very happy with the result , First, i had some small business to do in EBay , i tried two paid image service and the result was very bad due to the lack of support and script incapability . After wasting my money, i switched to some free image hosting and the result was good , personal i found that &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;xtupload&lt;/a&gt; has a good support and a complete script which more than enough for my need , later a friend told me about PhotoBucket which was also great , but I hate to be limited in my usage (25 GB per month ) , in theory this more than enough but i preferred to stay with my old host .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now I will recommend to any one those Hosts : 1 ) &lt;a href="http://www.photobucket.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;PhotoBucket&lt;/a&gt; (good bandwidth and high script capability ) 2) &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Xtupload&lt;/a&gt; (unlimited bandwidth disk space and good script capability) 3) &lt;a href="http://imageshack.us/" rel="nofollow"&gt;image hack us&lt;/a&gt; for moderate use .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do not waste your money , I will never pay anymore for any paid image hosting service (a was setting a waiting for a week in order to get reply from paid service , and almost instantly I got a reply from a free one pretty pathetic but this is the reality)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:26:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ImageBam - Fast, Free Image Hosting and Photo... - Tumbleando</title><link>http://florencio.disqus.com/imagebam_fast_free_image_hosting_and_photo_tumbleando/#comment-4246756</link><description>Personally, i am using this &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" title="free image hosting" rel="nofollow"&gt;free image hosting&lt;/a&gt; services, and I am very happy with the result , First, i had some small business to do in EBay , i tried two paid image service and the result was very bad due to the lack of support and script incapability . After wasting my money, i switched to some free image hosting and the result was good , personal i found that &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;xtupload&lt;/a&gt; has a good support and a complete script which more than enough for my need , later a friend told me about PhotoBucket which was also great , but I hate to be limited in my usage (25 GB per month ) , in theory this more than enough but i preferred to stay with my old host .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now I will recommend to any one those Hosts : 1 ) &lt;a href="http://www.photobucket.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;PhotoBucket&lt;/a&gt; (good bandwidth and high script capability ) 2) &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Xtupload&lt;/a&gt; (unlimited bandwidth disk space and good script capability) 3) &lt;a href="http://imageshack.us/" rel="nofollow"&gt;image hack us&lt;/a&gt; for moderate use .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do not waste your money , I will never pay anymore for any paid image hosting service (a was setting a waiting for a week in order to get reply from paid service , and almost instantly I got a reply from a free one pretty pathetic but this is the reality)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:25:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.rev2.org/2006/10/24/thumbq-launches-simple-image-hosting/</title><link>http://rev2.disqus.com/thread_891/#comment-4246752</link><description>Personally, i am using this &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" title="free image hosting" rel="nofollow"&gt;free image hosting&lt;/a&gt; services, and I am very happy with the result , First, i had some small business to do in EBay , i tried two paid image service and the result was very bad due to the lack of support and script incapability . After wasting my money, i switched to some free image hosting and the result was good , personal i found that &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;xtupload&lt;/a&gt; has a good support and a complete script which more than enough for my need , later a friend told me about PhotoBucket which was also great , but I hate to be limited in my usage (25 GB per month ) , in theory this more than enough but i preferred to stay with my old host .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now I will recommend to any one those Hosts : 1 ) &lt;a href="http://www.photobucket.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;PhotoBucket&lt;/a&gt; (good bandwidth and high script capability ) 2) &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Xtupload&lt;/a&gt; (unlimited bandwidth disk space and good script capability) 3) &lt;a href="http://imageshack.us/" rel="nofollow"&gt;image hack us&lt;/a&gt; for moderate use .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do not waste your money , I will never pay anymore for any paid image hosting service (a was setting a waiting for a week in order to get reply from paid service , and almost instantly I got a reply from a free one pretty pathetic but this is the reality)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:24:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Revival Experiment in your city? : 20 Elements of Revival Project : 120 people needed</title><link>http://praytherevolution.disqus.com/revival_experiment_in_your_city_20_elements_of_revival_project_120_people_needed/#comment-3062589</link><description>This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of&lt;br&gt;its recipients. The following addresses failed:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  &amp;lt;&lt;a href="mailto:john@r180.ihostexchange.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;john@r180.ihostexchange.net&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SMTP error from remote server in greeting:&lt;br&gt;host spam2.ihostexchange.net[66.46.182.72]:&lt;br&gt;554 Too many connections from origin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--- The header of the original message is following. ---&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Received: from &lt;a href="http://disqus.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;disqus.net&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href="http://disqus.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;disqus.com&lt;/a&gt; [74.86.107.154])&lt;br&gt;	by &lt;a href="http://mx.perfora.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;mx.perfora.net&lt;/a&gt; (node=mxus7) with ESMTP (Nemesis)&lt;br&gt;	id 0MKow4-1KpnJX3SUV-0000Xr for john@praytherevolution.com; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:04:07 -0400&lt;br&gt;Received: from &lt;a href="http://fray.disqus.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;fray.disqus.com&lt;/a&gt; (unknown [10.8.50.130])&lt;br&gt;	by &lt;a href="http://disqus.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;disqus.net&lt;/a&gt; (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD92401A2&lt;br&gt;	for &amp;lt;john@praytherevolution.com&amp;gt;; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:04:07 -0500 (CDT)&lt;br&gt;Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"&lt;br&gt;MIME-Version: 1.0&lt;br&gt;Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable&lt;br&gt;Subject: [praytherevolution] Re: Revival Experiment in your city? : 20&lt;br&gt;	Elements of Revival Project : 120 people needed</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">r180</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:35:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Todd Bentley Revival</title><link>http://praytherevolution.disqus.com/todd_bentley_revival/#comment-3062544</link><description>This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of&lt;br&gt;its recipients. The following addresses failed:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  &amp;lt;&lt;a href="mailto:john@r180.ihostexchange.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;john@r180.ihostexchange.net&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SMTP error from remote server in greeting:&lt;br&gt;host spam2.ihostexchange.net[66.46.182.72]:&lt;br&gt;554 Too many connections from origin&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;--- The header of the original message is following. ---&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Received: from &lt;a href="http://disqus.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;disqus.net&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href="http://disqus.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;disqus.com&lt;/a&gt; [74.86.107.154])&lt;br&gt;	by &lt;a href="http://mx.perfora.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;mx.perfora.net&lt;/a&gt; (node=mxus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis)&lt;br&gt;	id 0MKoXI-1Kpn5w00Pd-0000Q6 for john@praytherevolution.com; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:50:04 -0400&lt;br&gt;Received: from &lt;a href="http://fray.disqus.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;fray.disqus.com&lt;/a&gt; (unknown [10.8.50.130])&lt;br&gt;	by &lt;a href="http://disqus.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;disqus.net&lt;/a&gt; (Postfix) with ESMTP id C503F404AE&lt;br&gt;	for &amp;lt;john@praytherevolution.com&amp;gt;; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:50:03 -0500 (CDT)&lt;br&gt;Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"&lt;br&gt;MIME-Version: 1.0&lt;br&gt;Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable&lt;br&gt;Subject: [praytherevolution] Re: Todd Bentley Revival</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">r180</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:27:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Body Screams - &amp;#8220;Save My Ecosystem&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://stearmerblog.disqus.com/my_body_screams_8220save_my_ecosystem8221/#comment-3048431</link><description>Hi there, thanks for the comment. I appreciate you taking a look at my&lt;br&gt;site. I post everyday, but if there are questions you would like me&lt;br&gt;research I'd be glad to do that for you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks again for the comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Matthew Stearmer</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stearmer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:35:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joe Budden Let&amp;#8217;s Women Know Us Men Play Too Much</title><link>http://blogxilla.disqus.com/joe_budden_let8217s_women_know_us_men_play_too_much/#comment-3046189</link><description>Nice write up and blog , Thanks for sharing all those good info&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My Best regards&lt;br&gt;Moris&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://xtonlinegame.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://xtonlinegame.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:04:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Games the Future of Facebook?</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/are_games_the_future_of_facebook/#comment-3046187</link><description>Nice write up and blog , Thanks for sharing all those good info&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My Best regards&lt;br&gt;Moris&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://xtonlinegame.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://xtonlinegame.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:04:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Let&amp;#8217;s Play the Social Network Valuation Game!</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/let8217s_play_the_social_network_valuation_game/#comment-3046183</link><description>Nice write up and blog , Thanks for sharing all those good info&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My Best regards&lt;br&gt;Moris&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://xtonlinegame.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://xtonlinegame.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:04:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dietmar Hopp nach dem Spiel gegen Dortmund</title><link>http://ripanti.disqus.com/dietmar_hopp_nach_dem_spiel_gegen_dortmund/#comment-3046181</link><description>Nice write up and blog , Thanks for sharing all those good info&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My Best regards&lt;br&gt;Moris&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://xtonlinegame.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://xtonlinegame.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:04:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 Year High School Reunion</title><link>http://chevas.disqus.com/10_year_high_school_reunion/#comment-3046178</link><description>Nice write up and blog , Thanks for sharing all those good info&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My Best regards&lt;br&gt;Moris&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://xtonlinegame.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://xtonlinegame.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:04:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>