<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for gargouri2001</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-d81756ec" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/gargouri2001/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:56:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Some bloggers are Hyping Windows 7 operating System.</title><link>http://www.tech-linkblog.com/2008/10/some-bloggers-are-hyping-windows-7-operating-system.html/#comment-4487065</link><description>I just saw this comparison between windows Xp and windows 7 (&lt;a href="http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-7264-view-windows-7-vs-windows-xp-review.html" title="windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark" rel="nofollow"&gt;windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark&lt;/a&gt;) , look like the new windows has a better memory bandwidth and faster processor cache .&lt;br&gt;Too bad the HDD and 3 D performance was worse than in windows Xp , I hope that as the writer wrote that those issues will be fixed with new driver .&lt;br&gt;Note also the memory usage under windows 7 is also a lot lower than under windows vista the number of process was also reduced to 35 only . I hope that microsoft will come finally with some good OS .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:56:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 sees the light</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2008/10/29/windows-7-sees-the-light/#comment-4487050</link><description>I just saw this comparison between windows Xp and windows 7 (&lt;a href="http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-7264-view-windows-7-vs-windows-xp-review.html" title="windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark" rel="nofollow"&gt;windows 7 vs windows xp performance benchmark&lt;/a&gt;) , look like the new windows has a better memory bandwidth and faster processor cache .&lt;br&gt;Too bad the HDD and 3 D performance was worse than in windows Xp , I hope that as the writer wrote that those issues will be fixed with new driver .&lt;br&gt;Note also the memory usage under windows 7 is also a lot lower than under windows vista the number of process was also reduced to 35 only . I hope that microsoft will come finally with some good OS .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:55:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nilo's Bar</title><link>http://nilo.tumblr.com/post/3052758#comment-4246759</link><description>Personally, i am using this &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" title="free image hosting" rel="nofollow"&gt;free image hosting&lt;/a&gt; services, and I am very happy with the result , First, i had some small business to do in EBay , i tried two paid image service and the result was very bad due to the lack of support and script incapability . After wasting my money, i switched to some free image hosting and the result was good , personal i found that &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;xtupload&lt;/a&gt; has a good support and a complete script which more than enough for my need , later a friend told me about PhotoBucket which was also great , but I hate to be limited in my usage (25 GB per month ) , in theory this more than enough but i preferred to stay with my old host .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now I will recommend to any one those Hosts : 1 ) &lt;a href="http://www.photobucket.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;PhotoBucket&lt;/a&gt; (good bandwidth and high script capability ) 2) &lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Xtupload&lt;/a&gt; (unlimited bandwidth disk space and good script capability) 3) &lt;a href="http://imageshack.us/" rel="nofollow"&gt;image hack us&lt;/a&gt; for moderate use .&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do not waste your money , I will never pay anymore for any paid image hosting service (a was setting a waiting for a week in order to get reply from paid service , and almost instantly I got a reply from a free one pretty pathetic but this is the reality)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:26:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your Brand: Being Online and Brand Equity</title><link>http://www.othersidegroup.com/adcomments/2008/09/your-brand-being-online-and-brand-equity/#comment-3024353</link><description>really really useful info , Thanks for this post&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;john&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://xtupload.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://xtupload.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gargouri2001</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:36:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>