<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for funchords</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-57cdb66a" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/funchords/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:25:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Free Press Hypocrisy over Metering &amp;#038; Internet Price Controls</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2009/06/18/free-press-hypocrisy-over-metering-internet-price-controls/#comment-11578728</link><description>Wireless is an option, but it's comparable to the question, "Do I get there by plane or bus?"  The number of wireless providers offering tiers greater than 10 GB/mo. is zero, all the ones I know about turn on the punishment pricing at 5 GB.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;And sticking with that example for a moment, do two companies make a healthy market that efficiently sets the right bargain price (or however economists properly phrase that question)?  How many airlines service your nearest major airport?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">funchords</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:25:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Barbara Esbin: Exclusive Handset Deals Are Pro-Competitive</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2009/06/20/barbara-esbin-exclusive-handset-deals-are-pro-competitive/#comment-11560203</link><description>If history happened differently, say that every carrier could sell the iPhone, then this sentence also makes sense, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"As every wireless carrier was able to sell the iPhone when it was initially released, it seems predictable that other handset makers would develop competing products like the Google G1, RIM Blackberry Storm, Samsung Instinct or Palm Pre, thus broadening choice and lowering costs for all."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">funchords</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:46:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Press Hypocrisy over Metering &amp;#038; Internet Price Controls</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2009/06/18/free-press-hypocrisy-over-metering-internet-price-controls/#comment-11560046</link><description>TWC doesn't operate in a marketplace.  If it did, then the much better natural process that you mention would work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is not a new problem -- there are hundreds of years of history in trying to avoid unreasonable rates and terms in areas where vibrant marketplaces fail to exist.  (Examples: railroads, utilities)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I suppose the fact that someone is willing to pay it probably can be brought as evidence that something is fair.  On the contrary, the purpose of getting a public sign-off on such schemes is so that a lot of evidence can be brought in and considered.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">funchords</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:41:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Free Press Hypocrisy over Metering &amp;#038; Internet Price Controls</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2009/06/18/free-press-hypocrisy-over-metering-internet-price-controls/#comment-11490129</link><description>Since the Massa bill prohibits imposing metering "rates, terms and conditions that are unreasonable or discriminatory," I don't see anything inconsistent in supporting metering that is fairly priced.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">funchords</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:32:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Too bad there isn&amp;#8217;t a campaign for FCC Chairman</title><link>http://chernow.org/blog/2008/11/10/too-bad-there-isnt-a-campaign-for-fcc-chairman/#comment-3693375</link><description>It would be great if the next FCC chair was a ham and an Internet fan.  It certainly would help to have more technically savvy folks in the big chairs than we do now.  Too bad there isn’t a campaign for FCC Chairman, I'd vote for you! ;-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">funchords</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:50:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Market Forces At Work:  The PR Backlash Against Google Chrome&amp;#8217;s EULA</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/09/04/market-forces-at-work-the-pr-backlash-against-google-chromes-eula/#comment-2138362</link><description>Google's browser exists in a universe where there was zero friction -- it was a new entrant in a highly competitive market and it had exactly 0% of it.  Of course the marketplace speaks in a situation like that.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your first-sentence reference to Network Neutrality isn't exactly the same, is it?  Most U.S. addresses have only one or two broadband choices.  Customers don't have the same ability just to slide over to the any number of alternative broadband providers as they do to switch web browsers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And lest we forget that this controversy was about an item in the Terms of Service that was available to be scrutinized.  The broadband providers, so far, are not being very forthcoming as to the real terms and limits and privacy invasions within their services.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Robb Topolski</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">funchords</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:34:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I say I'm a blogger (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/18/whyISayImABlogger.html#comment-354127</link><description>With respect, Dave, I somewhat disagree.  Some of the best journalism has been the "undercover camera" type of interview with discloses actual behavior versus "on camera" behavior.  Furthermore, one of the neat things that bloggers do is to blog about the outcome of a string of events that didn't start out intended as a blog entry, but ended up being one.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Robb Topolski</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">funchords</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:27:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A new reason to hate Comcast (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/04/16/aNewReasonToHateComcast.html#comment-345354</link><description>If anyone reading this is in the Bay Area tomorrow, I hope you drop by the FCC hearing at Stanford, noon-7pm with public comments starting at 4:30 p.m..  See &lt;a href="http://www.fcc.gov" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.fcc.gov&lt;/a&gt; for the location address and agenda.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can watch it on VonTV tomorrow, too, or listen to the RealAudio feed from the FCC site.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">funchords</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:06:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>